Essay
Employment Law Problem Question - Discrimination
- Course
- Institution
Employment Law Problem Question on Discrimination
[Show more]
1 review
By: aarjunkatechia • 6 months ago
Seller
Follow
legalwarrior1
Reviews received
Content preview
Grade: 65QUESTION
St. Agatha’s is a private boarding school proud of its long tradition of only
admitting girls. The school board wishes to employ a professional fundraiser
for the school. The advert for the post that is placed into the local newspaper
states that a) ‘only past pupils need apply’ to a maintain a link to the traditions
of the school, and b) that ‘preference may be given to candidates that have
been resident for forty or more years in the locality, to ensure familiarity with
the local people and with the long tradition of the school’.
Three candidates apply. Adam, a white man, is immediately rejected, on the
grounds that he did not attend the school. Geraldine, a forty-year old past
pupil and a well-known local campaigner for equal rights for homosexual
couples, is also rejected, on the grounds that her campaign work does not suit
the image that the school is attempting to project. Breonna, a thirty-year old
past pupil who is black is called to interview. Breonna attends the interview
with her hair worn naturally (that is, curly and not straightened). One of the
three interviewees asks Breonna if she always wears her hair in that way as
they have a strict policy against ‘unprofessional’ hairstyles. Breonna responds
that yes, this is her preferred hairstyle. Breonna is not offered the job and is
also not given a reason for the rejection. Two weeks later, the post is re-
advertised.
Advise all three applicants on their potential claims for discrimination.
Answers must not exceed 1,500 words.
ANSWER
All claimants will be advised on their potential claims for discrimination against St Agatha’s under the
Equality Act 2010 (hereinafter EqA). Although the claimants are not employees, protection extends
to recruitment arrangements (S39(1)(a)).
, Adam
Adam could bring a claim for sex discrimination (S11 EqA), if he can prove the advertisement’s
requirement that “only past pupils can apply” has the effect of excluding men, who historically
haven’t been admitted to the school. Whilst indirect discrimination may apply considering the
criterion short-listing candidates deterring men from applying, it’s so closely linked to the protected
characteristic that application amounts to direct discrimination (James v Eastleigh [1990]).
A. Direct Discrimination
To establish direct discrimination (S13 EqA), Adam must have firstly been ‘treated less favourably’
than others. The EHRC Statutory Code of Practice on Employment (hereinafter ‘Code’) defines this as
including “being deprived of a choice or excluded from an opportunity” (S3.4) which was upheld for
sex discrimination in Birmingham City Council [1989]. As the advert stated, “only past pupils need
apply”, with St Agatha’s being an all-girls private school, it deprives men of an employment
opportunity. If Adam can prove sex isn’t an actual job requirement, St Agatha’s would be liable for
excluding talented workers from employment based on gender.
Secondly, the treatment must be ‘because of a protected characteristic’ which can be proven by
using hypothetically-constructed comparator with equal material circumstances (S23 EqA) but
lacking the protected characteristic (Shamoon [2003]). Nonetheless, ‘but for’ Adam’s sex, he would
have been treated equivalently because a woman with identical material circumstances didn’t
attend the school, meaning gender wasn’t the fundamental ‘reason why the claimant was treated
the way he was’ (Shamoon [2003]).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller legalwarrior1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$7.18. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now