Essay
Land Law Essay - Unregistered Land and the Land Registration Act.
- Course
- Institution
A land law essay on unregistered Land and the Land Registration Act.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
legalwarrior1
Reviews received
Content preview
‘Compared to the system of unregistered land with its obvious deficiencies, the Land RegistrationAct 2002 was designed to deliver a simple and modern scheme for registered land. Yet, in key
respects, the 2002 legislation fails to deliver on its stated aims.’
Explore this statement with reference to relevant case law, statute and academic commentary.
This essay aims to defend the position that the impact of the Land Registration Act 2002 (hereinafter
LRA2002) is a drastic improvement on the obvious deficiencies related to unregistered land and
previous statutes governing the registered system, providing a simplified and modern scheme.
Whilst there are questions regarding the certainty of the system, comprehensively the LRA2002 has
achieved a delivery on its stated aims, so far as it was possible to do so, valuing contextualised
justice over codification and absolute certainty.
This essay will first outline the obvious deficiencies of unregistered land which led to the enactment
of the various Land Registration Acts. The stated aims of the LRA2002 will then be summarised
before analysing to what extent it successfully delivers on the aims to achieve total registration,
minimise the impact of overriding interests and reduce the ‘registration gap’ by implementing e-
conveyancing.
The deficiencies of unregistered land
Under the system of unregistered land, there is no register of title, rather land is registered under
the owner’s name. Subsequently, there are some obvious deficiencies with this system as a result of
the doctrine of notice and the principle of universal enforceability. The effectiveness of the system
depends on registration against the correct name and searches being undertaken against the correct
name. If an incorrect name is searched against, no interests will be revealed but it will be binding
, against that person (Oak Co-operative Building Society v Blackburn [1968]). However, if a purchaser
searches against the correct name, but the land has been registered under an incorrect name it will
not bind the purchaser (Diligent v Alleyne [1972]). Due to the unpredictability arising from the
unregistered land regime, the registered land system is title-based, aiming to bring all unregistered
land under its scope and be accessible on an electronic register that is managed by the Land Registry
and is currently regulated by the LRA2002.
The aims of the Land Registration Act 2002
The LRA2002 offers a comprehensive statutory framework for dealings with registered titles, which is
said to be guided by Ruoff’s three foundational principles: the mirror, curtain and insurance principles.
The statute was originally enacted to resolve the deficiencies with the Land Registration Act 1925,
described as “badly drafted and lacking in clarity” (Bevan, 2022), maintaining its core principles whilst
replacing it with a contemporary, strengthened and simplified scheme for title registration,
“eliminat[ing] complexity and uncertainty in conveyancing” (Law Commission, 2018). The legislation
achieves major reform in being accessible and largely free from undisclosed interests, however, as
the landscape in which it was enacted has changed drastically with technology not having developed
as predicted (Law Commission, 2018), e-conveyancing has not been achieved, though the Act
succeeds in delivering on the rest of its stated aims comprehensively.
Firstly, the LRA2002 aimed to make categories of ‘triggering events’ bringing unregistered land into the
registered system more expansive. This was achieved by enacting ‘triggers’ via section 4 of the Act to
initiate first registration, successfully increasing the number of circumstances where a duty is imposed
to register land with its transfer becoming void if an individual fails to act. As a result, more
unregistered land is being brought under the registered system, moving towards the underlying goal of
‘total registration’, eliminating the aforementioned deficiencies of unregistered land whilst creating
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller legalwarrior1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$7.18. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now