Summary

Risk Assessment (summary of all course material)

60 views 7 purchases

Course
Risk Assessment (500198B6)

Institution
Tilburg University (UVT)

This is a summary of all the course material (incl. lectures and all articles) written in the year 2022/2023. Using this summary only, I passed with a high grade on the first try. However, the summary might not be up to date with your own course content, as I do not have information about poten...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 43 pages

View example

Uploaded on January 11, 2024
Number of pages 43
Written in 2022/2023
Type Summary

risk
assessment
forensic
psychology

Institution
Tilburg University (UVT)
Education
Psychologie
Course
Risk Assessment (500198B6)

solutiont

Member since 2 year 35 documents sold

CA$11.56

Added

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Risk Assessment

Literature lecture 1
Brown and Singh
Forensic risk assessment – attempt to predict the likelihood of future offending in order to
identify individuals in need of intervention, the likelihood of future antisocial behavior
Dangerousness – a high probability of inflicting imminent physical harm
Risk vs Protective factors (increase VS decrease the likelihood of antisocial behavior)
- Static factors – historical or unchanging
- Acutely dynamic – modifiable and likely to change
- Stably dynamic factors – modifiable but unlikely to change
Identifying risk and protective factors – Grann and Langstrom – the empirical method
(factors identified through experiments), the theoretical method (some theory used), the
clinical method (individual characteristics)
Contemporary approaches to forensic risk assessment
- Unstructured clinical judgment (UCJ) – subjective evaluation, it is flexible,
inexpensive, but poor reliability and validity – seminal monograph by Monahan
(Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior)
- Actuarial assessment – structured instruments, composed of risk and protective
factors, which are either static or dynamic and related to the adverse event – each
item is weighted in – we get a total score, we cannot apply group-based recidivism to
individual clients
o VRAG-R – 12 item instrument, static factors, 7 domains
o Static-99R – 10 item, static risk, four domains
o LS/CMI – 43 item, static and dynamic factors
- Structured professional judgment (SPJ) – due to the inflexibility of actuarial
schemes, factors associated according to theory, more accurate
o HCR-20 – 20 item, static and dynamic, three domains
o SVR-2- same, sexually violent predator hearings
o START – 20 item, dynamic risk, protective factors

Tarasoff v Regents of the UC – obligation to use protective care against the victim of a client
- mental health professionals have a duty to protect those individuals whom their patients
threaten with bodily harm
No single risk assessment tool is more accurate than others

,Lecture 1
➢Probability calculation that a harmful behavior or event will occur, and involves an
assessment about the frequency of the behavior (or event), its likely impact and who it will
affect” (Kemshall, 1996)
➢“The attempt to predict the likelihood of future offending in order to identify individuals
in need of intervention” (Brown & Singh, 2014)
Risk management – interventions to manage the risk or to reduce the risk
Why is risk management important – safety, public interest, ethical importance,
therapeutical importance (RNR model), communication

History
- 1876 – Lombroso – criminals have certain physical characteristics
- Burgess – 1928 – first risk assessment tool – risk of re-offense of offenders being
released from the Illinois prison system, actuarial
o Marital status, criminal and employment history, institutional misconduct
o Calculations based on analyses of data for 3k individuals paroled in Chicago,
76% high risk status recidivated within 5 years
- Baxstrom v Herold – 1966 – dangerous patients vs those released into society,
followed up by Steadman Cocozza (1978) – after 4 years of follow-up 2.7% sent back
to psychiatric hospital
- In the 70s 80s it is NOT proved that professionals can predict future violence
- Expertise of the expert – similar between teachers and psychiatrists, more info –
more conservative judgment – only accurate in 1 out of 3 cases – 80s
- 90s - Martien Philipse – TBS – innovative – no predictors suggested by the clinicians
were predictive, also no link between the clinical assessment of relapse risk and
actual recidivism
RNR
- Evidence based practice – based on scientific research into effectiveness of those
interventions
- Risk principle – higher risk benefit from
more intensive treatment, who to
treat, matching level of risk with level of
treatment – risk of recidivism is central,
increased risk of recidivism if wrong
level of intensity
- Need – only factors associated with a
reduction should be addressed in
treatment, what to treat – criminogenic
needs – factors that lead to crime

, - Responsivity – tailored to offenders characteristics, motivation, circumstances,
learning style
Criminogenic needs
1. History of antisocial behavior (static) – risk – early and ongoing involvement in
antisocial acts, work on alternative behavior
2. Antisocial personality pattern – thrill seeking, aggression,- problem solving skills,
self-management skills, anger management, coping
3. Antisocial cognitions – attitudes, values, beliefs – reducing them, recognizing them
4. Antisocial peers – close contacts with criminal others – reducing them, building
contacts with non-criminals
5. Family/marital relationships – education, care, control, supervision – reduce
conflict, improve control, build positive relationships
6. School/job – low achievement, low satisfaction – improving performance, rewards,
satisfaction
7. Prosocial recreational activities – low engagement and satisfaction in non-criminal
leisure activities, improving engagement, rewards and satisfaction
8. Substance abuse – reduction of it, having support
Non-criminogenic needs
- Less research done, not proven
- Self-esteem, emotional problems, psych. Disorder, health

Literature lecture 2
De Vries Robbe, Willis
Positive psychology – optimism and achieving happiness
Protective factors – internal resilience factors, community integration factors, treatment
related factors, social factors, environmental factors
Important for youth violence, sexual offending
GLM – protective factors as prosocial means or strategies t achieve one or more primary
human goods – common life goals
- Offending less desirable when addressing causal factors and finding prosocial
alternatives
Implementing GLM in clinical practice
Structured methods of risk assessment>>>>>unstructured
Unipolar factors -opposing ends to a risk continuum

, SAPROF – Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk
- Unipolar
- 17 protective factors
- Three scales
- Sexual violence risk, or medium-term risk-focused tools for violence risk
SAPROF-YV
- For juveniles and young adults
- 16 factors in four scales (resilience, motivational, relational and external).
Desistence for Adolescents who Sexually Harm
Balanced approach to risk assessment
- Over-prediction of risk – can create pessimism among therapists
Personal guidelines to building skills and resources
Treatment motivation and treatment-alliance
Evaluation of treatment progress
Assessment results and risk management: the importance of context

Lecture 2
Predictive validity
- Area Under the Curve (AUC) – receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, to
classify future recidivist vs non-recidivist, 1 is perfect discrimination .56 small, .64
moderate, .71 strong – risk scores and outcome – retrospective measure – chance
that a random recidivist gets a higher score than a random non-recidivist – sensitivity
and specificity, no cut-off needed

non

- NPV – negative predictive value – the proportion of offenders who were assessed as
low risk, and later did not reoffend

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller solutiont. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.56. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Summary

Risk Assessment (summary of all course material)

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview