Answers
Past exam paper
- Course
- Institution
- Book
Past examination paper which includes questions and answers on Co-Ownership, Freehold covenants and Easements
[Show more]
Connected book
Book Title:
Author(s):
- Edition:
- ISBN:
- Edition:
More summaries for
-
Reform of Freehold Covenants Essay Plan
-
Fixtures / Chattels
-
The 1925 Property Legislation
Seller
Follow
1Caillou
Reviews received
Content preview
Question 4Axel was the registered proprietor of commercial premises. Three years ago, he converted the
premises into two separate units – Unit 1 and Unit 2. He retained Unit 1 and used it to carry on a
business as a wine bar. The wine bar has a refined, middle- aged clientele.
Two years ago, Axel sold Unit 2 to Baptiste, who was registered as its proprietor. The deed of transfer,
which was signed by Axel and Baptiste, contains the following covenants:
‘Baptiste covenants:
1. (1) not to sell any alcohol products from Unit 2; and
2. (2) not to use Unit 2 in any way that causes a nuisance to the owner or customers of Unit 1.’
Axel entered notices of both covenants on the Charges Register of Unit 2.
Baptiste used Unit 2 to carry on a business as a newsagent.
Last year, Axel sold Unit 1 and the wine bar business to Clement. Clement was registered as the
proprietor of Unit 1. The deed transferring Unit 1 to Clement contains an express assignment of the
benefit of covenant (1), but not covenant (2). Two weeks after transferring Unit 1 to Clement, Axel
noticed that he had not assigned the benefit of covenant (2) to Clement. In order to rectify this
omission, Axel executed a deed in which he assigned to Clement the benefit of covenant (2).
Six months ago, Baptiste sold Unit 2 to David, who was registered as its proprietor. David is using
Unit 2 as an off-licence. He is selling alcoholic drinks to teenagers at bargain prices. Every night
teenagers hang around outside the off-licence drinking beer. They are loud and aggressive to passers-
by. As a result, there has been a significant reduction in business at Unit 1.
Advise the parties:
(i) whether David is subject to the burden of the covenants in equity;
(ii) whether Clément has acquired the benefit of the covenants in equity; and
(iii) what remedies are available to Clément.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller 1Caillou. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$13.51. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now