100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
A* Summary Notes on the WHOLE of the MEMORY AQA A Level Psychology CA$34.85   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. AQA
  4.  
  5. Psychology
  6.  
  7. Memory

Summary

A* Summary Notes on the WHOLE of the MEMORY AQA A Level Psychology

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Memory
  • Institution
  • AQA

21 page document on ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW FOR MEMORY! <3 A* terminology and quality I achieved an A* using these notes :) ENJOY Huge timer saver and such an effective and concise way to revise!

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

Document information

  • January 29, 2024
  • 20
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

  • aqa
  • a levels
  • memory
  • eyewitness testimony
  • quality
  • psychology
  • biology
  • summary

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • AQA
  • Psychology
  • Memory
All documents for this subject (454)

Seller

avatar-seller
studytogether

Reviews received

Content preview

Memory
21 page concise, clear and A* quality document
Boost your A Level Psychology grade and get that A*
Achieved A*A*AA at A Level
From A Level student to A Level student <3
ALL NEEDED KNOWLEDGE FOR THIS TOPIC IN THIS DOCUMENT 

Coding, capacity and duration of memory

Encoding = form in which memories are stored eg acoustically, visually and semantically
Capacity = how much can be stored
Duration = how long you can store the memory

Research on coding
- Process of converting information between different forms

Baddeley (1966) gave different lists of words of 4 for P’s to remember
- Group 1: acoustically similar - words sounded similar (eg cat, cab, can)
- Group 2: acoustically disimilar - words sounded different (eg pit, few, cow)
- Group 3: semantically similar - words with similar meanings (eg great, huge, big)
- Group 4: semantically dissimilar- words with different meanings (eg good, huge, hot)

P’s shown the original words and asked to recall them in correct order
Findings:
- When did task immediately, recalling from STM, tended to do worse with acoustically similar
words
- When did task after a time interval of 20 mins, recalling from LTM, did worse with
semantically similar words

Conclusion
- Suggests information is coded acoustically in STM and semantically in LTM

STM = Acoustic
LTM = Semantic

Strength
- Baddeley’s study identified a clear difference between two memory sites
- Idea that STM codes mostly acoustically and LTM codes mostly semantically has stood test of
time
- Important step in understanding memory system, which led to multi-store model

Limitation
- Baddeley’s study used quite artificial stimuli rather than meaningful material
- Word lists had no personal meaning to particpants/some words could be person to P’s
- Findings may tell us much about coding in different kinds of memory tasks, especially in
everyday life
- When processing more meaningful information, people may use semantic coding even for
STM tasks
- Suggests that findings from this study have limited application

,Research on capacity
- How much information STM can hold at one time

Digit span
- Jacobs (1887) found out that by measuring digit span
- Researcher reads 4 digits and P recalls these out loud in correct order
- If correct, researcher reads out 5 digits and so on until P cannot recall order correctly
- This indicates the individuals digit span

Span of memory and chunking
- Miller (1956) made observations of everyday practice
- Eg, noted things that come in sevens: notes of musical scale, days of week
- Miller thought that the span (ie capacity) of STM is about 7 items, plus or minus 2 = magic
number
- Noted that people can recall 5 words as easily as 5 letters
- Do this by chunking – grouping sets of digits or letters into units/chunks
- Chunking increases amount of info stored

Strength
- Jacobs’ study has been replicated
- Jacobs’ study is old and early research in psychology often lacked adequate controls
- For example, some P’s might have been underestimated because they were distracted
during testing (confounding variable)
- Despite this, Bopp and Verhaeghen (2005) confirmed Jacobs’ findings
- Suggests his study was a valid test for digit span in STM

Limitation
- Miller’s research may have overestimated STM capacity
- Cowan (2001) reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity of STM is only about
4 plus or minus 1 chunks
- Suggests that the lower end of Miller’s estimate (5 items) is more appropriate than 7 items

Research on duration

Duration of STM
- Peterson and Peterson (1959) tested 24 students in 8 trials each
- Each trial student given a consonant syllable/trigram (eg YCG) to remember
- Also given a 3 digit number
- Student counted backwards from this number until told to stop
- Counting backwards was to prevent mental rehersal of consonant syllable (which would
increase the duration of STM memory for the syllable)
- On each trial told to stop after varying periods of time: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds (the
retention interval)

Findings:
- After 3 seconds, average recall was about 80%
- After 18 seconds, average recall was about 3%

Conclusion:
- Suggests that STM duration may be about 18 seconds, unless we repeat the information
over and over (ie verbal recall)

, Duration of LTM
- Bahrick et al (1975) studied 392 American participants aged 17 – 74
- High school yearbooks obtained from the participants or directly from some schools
- Recall was tested in various ways: 1) photo recognition test consisting of 50 photos, some
part high school year books, 2) free recall test where participants recalled all the names of
their graduating class

Findings:
- P’s tested within 15 years of graduation, about 90% accurate in photo recognition
- After 48 years, recall declined to about 70% for photo recognition
- After 15 years, about 60% for free recall
- After 48 years, about 30% for free recall

Conclusion:
- Shows that LTM may last up to a lifetime for some material

Strength
- Bahrick et al’s study has high external validity
- Researchers investigated meaningful memories (eg names and faces)
- Shepard (1967) proved that when meaningless pictures were remembered recall rates were
lower
- Suggests Bahrick’s findings reflect a more “real” estimate of the duration of LTM
- High external realism – high mundane realism

Limitation
- Peterson and Peterson’s study used artificial stimuli
- Study is not completely irrelevant because sometimes we try to remember fairly irrelevant
stimulus (eg phone numbers)
- Even so, recalling consonant syllables does not reflect most everyday memory activities
where what we are trying to remember is meaningful
- Study lacked external validty so we cannot generalise findings to everyday life outside of the
lab

STM LTM
Encoding Baddeley - Acoustic Baddeley - Semantic
Capacity Miller/Jacobs – 7+-2 No research (unlimited)
Duration Petersen and Petersen – 18sec Bahrick – lifetime

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller studytogether. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$34.85. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$34.85
  • (0)
  Add to cart