100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
POD Summary of lectures + authors Exam CA$12.04   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)
  4.  
  5. The Politics of Difference (73220044FY)

Summary

POD Summary of lectures + authors Exam

1 review
 61 views  9 purchases
  • Course
  • The Politics of Difference (73220044FY)
  • Institution
  • Universiteit Van Amsterdam (UvA)

Summary for the POD Exam. I mixed the content of the lectures with short but 'straight to the point' summaries of what the authors/readings were saying. 2 pages per lecture, with the essential content/concepts etc = easier to learn !

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

Document information

  • March 15, 2024
  • 20
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

Subjects

  • the politics of difference

Written for

  • Universiteit van Amsterdam (UvA)
  • Politicologie
  • The Politics of Difference (73220044FY)
All documents for this subject (14)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: viviennewesselink • 8 months ago

Seller

avatar-seller
Ljlvt

Reviews received

Content preview

LECTURE 2: DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC


Public Sphere:
 communicative realm
 to discuss and debate common interest and government
 the force of the better argument wins (coercion is absent)
 participants leave their identities and status behind

Discussing the common interest and government ⇒ Who’s part of the “common” or what is
the government?
→ Some groups are often excluded from the public sphere (e.g. unauthorised migrants,
people at the end of the global supply chain) = decisions being made for their future without
them.

How can we establish fair rules?
 Veil of ignorance ⇒ participating in discussion (about allocating resources + social
justice) without knowing what identity/position you will have in society.
 Removing your identity before discussion is central according to John Rawls.

We make theory for someone and some purpose.
Positionality = decide what article to read based on title, source, gender, language etc.
Mythical debate between Naive Objectivity and Extreme Relativism.

Bennett and Livingston:

Worried about disinformation undermining the realm of communication and force of the
better argument.
4 arguments about the Disinformation Age:
 Confirmation bias: tend to seek out information that confirms our beliefs and avoid
opposing arguments.
 Social media: puts confirmation bias on speed because their algorithms allow for the
proliferation of specific ideas.
 State interference: active and powerful agents founded by govs to produce
disinformation.
 Erosion of liberal institutions: they help to regulate information and allow for a
reasoned debate.

Solutions:
 Finding ways to restore more representative and responsive parties
 Reinventing a press that may help develop and tell the story
 Repairing the basic functioning of democratic institutions by thinking critically about
the present conditions of democracies
Young:

,The deliberative democratic model has exclusionary implications:
 Social power prevents people from being equal speakers.
 Privilege is likely to dominate the discussion.
 Cannot assume that there is a shared understanding to base a deliberation on.
 Certain types of speeches are valued more, by particular members.
o speech with practical purpose (”we should do this”, not “I’m not sure”).
o obsession with logic as a form of rational debate.
o manner = how to behave and present your ideas.

Proposes a model of ‘communicative democracy:
 Significant interdependence.
 Formally equal respect.
 Agreed-on procedures for fair decision-making and discussion.

3 elements that broaden the conception of communicative democracy:
 Greeting = how you address the audience. Helps establish trust and respect.
 Rhetoric = giving reasons and justifications for opinions and judgements + using
certain forms and styles. Gets and keeps attention.
 Storytelling = use of narrative to communicate ideas to people who aren’t affected by
an issue. Reveals a source of values and meaning that bring people together to solve
the issue.

⇒ Combination of the 3 the underprivileged have a say and right to assert.

, LECTURE 3: RELIGION


After the Cold War = the idea that religion was going to become a central point of tension
(Clash of Civilisation).
Fundamentalism driving the return of religion? Religion is moving and adapting all the time,
not just outdated ideas.

Religion is the medium of political thought.
E.g. Thomas Hobbes and Leviathan (the foundation of authority).
Many prominent political leaders had a religious foundation behind their fight like Gandhi.

Religious tolerance is at the foundation of the state system.
E.g. Peace of Westphalia “cuius regio eius religio” = in every state the ruler chooses the
religion and the rights and duties that derive from it.
Diversity of models of tolerance.

Religious chauvinism at the foundation of the state system.
E.g. Line of Pope Alexander VI to divide between Spain and Portugal ⇒ sovereignty not
applied to non-Christian leaders of countries.

Public Sphere = secular
 separation between State and Religion.
 realm that is non-religious → rules on the basis of rationality and common reason.
 religion is protected in the private realm → no intervention from the state when a
Church decides rules for its members.
⇒ 3 Pillars of secularism.


Can people of faith participate fully in the public sphere (through translation)?

Taylor:

Believes in spiritualism in non-believers. Religiosity’s role in the public sphere is not an issue
as we all understand the basis of spirituality (e.g. doing yoga, buying crystals).
The moment of fullness created by spirituality isn’t inaccessible to non-religious people.
 There may be a legitimate ground => no need for translation.

Rawls and Habermas

Religious reasons can be inaccessible for non-religious members:
 Myth: x is good because the story says it.
 Ritual: x is good because my community says it + feeling of belonging.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Ljlvt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$12.04. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$12.04  9x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart