100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
LCP4804 Assignment 2 2024 (751282) CA$3.90   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa
  4.  
  5. LCP4804 - Advanced Indigenous Law (LCP4804)

Exam (elaborations)

LCP4804 Assignment 2 2024 (751282)
 13 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • LCP4804 - Advanced Indigenous Law (LCP4804)
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa
  • Book
  • Indigenous Law

LCP4804 ASSIGNMENT 2 2024 ... 100 % TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. For assistance call or W.h.a.t.s.a.p.p us on +/ 2/ 5/ 4 /7 /7 /9 /5 /4 /0 /1 /3 /2 . Question 1 Tendai and Keneilwe were University sweethearts, and as soon as they graduated from university in 2015 decided to li...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10  pages

Document information

  • April 2, 2024
  • 10
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • lcp4804 assignment 2 2024 unique nr 751282

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • LCP4804 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (751282) - DUE 3 April 2024
All for this textbook (2)

Written for

  • University of South Africa
  • LCP4804 - Advanced Indigenous Law (LCP4804)
All documents for this subject (81)

Seller

avatar-seller
LIBRARYpro

Reviews received

Content preview

LCP4804
ASSIGNMENT 2 2024

, Instructions
(i) Answer all questions.
(ii) Number your answers to correspond with the questions to be addressed.
(iii) Reference your work, with both footnotes and the bibliography, taking
care to fully reference cases and paragraphs referred to.


Question 1
Tendai and Keneilwe were University sweethearts, and as soon as they graduated from
university in 2015 decided to live together. In 2020, Tendai’s uncle intimated to the couple
that he is prepared to assist them with initiating the talks between the families to start
marriage negotiations for the couple. They both agreed and a meeting between the two
families was arranged in May 2020 for the negotiations to begin. Although charging the
R120,000 as the amount liable to be paid lobolo to Keneilwe’s family, an amount of R80,000
was agreed upon by the familied to at least be paid by Tendai’s family to be able to secure a
marriage agreement with Keneilwe’s family. Tendai was only able to raise R50,000 and
transferred this amount to Keneilwe’s family, regarding it as a deposit to the prescribed
R80,000. The slaughtering of the cow ceremony to mark the conclusion of the marriage
negotiations was postponed until the payment of the shortfall to R80,000 as the agreed
amount by the families.
Meanwhile, the couple had already bought and fully paid for the house they lived in at the
time of their marriage negotiations which was registered under Tendai’s name. Soon after
the R50,000 had been transferred to Keneilwe’s family, the couple also threw a lavish party
in their house where they invited their friends and family members. At this party, Tendai had
bought Keneilwe a special wedding ring and in his speech was referring to her as his wife as
a video of the proceedings was also recorded. Moreover, in the following month, Tendai was
able to add Keneilwe as his spouse in the medical insurance he was paying for.
In August 2021, Tendai passed on due to the covid pandemic. When Keneilwe approached
the Master’s office to claim from the estate as the surviving spouse, Tendai’s family appealed
to the court to stop her, arguing that she is not recognised as their late son’s spouse due to
the non-conclusion of the marriage negotiations which were to be marked by the slaughter of
a cow.
With the aid of decided cases including Motsoatsoa v Roro All SA 324 (GSJ); Maluleke v
Minister of Home Affairs Case no 02/24921 [2008] ZAGPHC 129 (9 April 2008)
(unreported); Mabuza v Mbatha 2003 (7) BCLR 43, Advise Keneilwe on the prospects of
having her marriage to Tendai legally recognised as valid by the courts. Your discussion must
reflect.
- The legal question in each case (9)
- The reasons for the decision for each case (9)
- The decision arrived at by the courts in each case. (6)

- A summary of the interpretation that can be ascribed to section 3(1)(b) for the
requirements of a valid customary law marriage because of the above court
decisions. (1)

[25]

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LIBRARYpro. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$3.90. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$3.90
  • (0)
  Add to cart