100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
PVL3703 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (576663) - DUE 23 April 2024 CA$3.99   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. Law of Delict - PVL3703 (PVL3703)

Exam (elaborations)

PVL3703 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (576663) - DUE 23 April 2024

5 reviews
 762 views  34 purchases
  • Course
  • Law of Delict - PVL3703 (PVL3703)
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Book
  • Law of Delict

PVL3703 Assignment 3 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 1 2024 (576663) - DUE 23 April 2024 ;100% TRUSTED workings, explanations and solutions. for assistance Whats-App.......0.6.7..1.7.1..1.7.3.9....... Question 1 One of the attractions at Wonderland Zoo is a train ride that takes customers to and from ...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 192  pages

Document information

  • April 21, 2024
  • 192
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • pvl3703

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • PVL3703 EXAM PACK 2024
  • PVL3703 EXAM PACK 2024 - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED
  • PVL3703 EXAM PACK 2024
All for this textbook (14)

Written for

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Law of Delict - PVL3703 (PVL3703)
All documents for this subject (25)

5  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: jcnel15 • 1 month ago

review-writer-avatar

By: sienna28 • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: chidz777 • 6 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: juniorluyolomali • 6 months ago

I got 68% for my assignment.

review-writer-avatar

By: ronewavhumbane • 7 months ago

Seller

avatar-seller
iStudy

Reviews received

Content preview

PVL3703
Assignment 3 Semester 1 2024
Detailed Solutions, References & Explanations

Unique number: 576663

Due Date: 23 April 2024




Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
• Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
• Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
• Fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.


Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

, +27 67 171 1739


Question 1
One of the attractions at Wonderland Zoo is a train ride that takes customers to and from
different locations at the zoo. Sipho, the technician in charge of inspecting and maintaining
the train, overlooks some signs that the train is no longer in sound condition. Avril goes for a
ride on the train. The operator of the train requests the persons boarding the train to fasten
their safety belts. However, Avril decides not to fasten her safety belt, because she wants to
take good selfie pictures during the ride. During the ride, the train breaks down and comes to
an abrupt standstill resulting in only Avril being thrown out of the train. Avril sustains a
broken arm and is hospitalised. After four days, Avril is discharged, but on her way out of the
hospital, she slips on some oily substance on the floor and falls. Due to the fall, Avril
sustains a broken leg. Select the best option in respect of Avril’s broken arm:

a.
There is a factual as well as a legal causal link between Sipho’s conduct and Avril’s broken
arm.
b.
There is no causal link between Sipho’s conduct and Avril’s broken arm.
c.
There is only a factual causal link between Sipho’s conduct and Avril’s broken arm.
d.
There is only a legal causal link between Sipho’s conduct and Avril’s broken arm.
Clear my choice



Question 2
Which one of the following cases dealt explicitly with the sequence in which the elements of
delictual liability should be considered?

a.
_Kruger v Coetzee_ 1966 2 SA 428 (A).
b.
_Van Eeden v Minister of Safety and Security (Women’s Legal Centre Trust, as amicus
curiae)_ 2003 1 SA 389 (SCA).
c.
_First National Bank of South Africa Ltd v Duvenhage_ 2006 5 SA 319 (SCA).
d.
_S v Goliath_ 1972 3 SA 1 (A).
Clear my choice




Question 3
Musa, a financial adviser, negligently advises Hector to make a bad investment. As a result
of this, Hector suffers a serious financial setback. However, there is no damage to Hector’s
person or property. Which one of the following delictual remedies may be available if Hector
wishes to recover his financial loss from Musa?

a.
The action for pain and suffering.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

, +27 67 171 1739

b.
The interdict.
c.
The _actio iniuriarum_.
d.
The _actio legis Aquiliae_.


Question 4
Answer saved
Marked out of 2

Flag question

Question text
Percy stalks Priscilla and photographs her from a distance with a powerful telephoto lens. If
Priscilla discovers this and wishes to institute a delictual action against Percy, she would
need to prove that Percy had the following form/s of fault (select the best option):

a.
Intention or negligence.
b.
Negligence.
c.
It is not necessary to prove any form of fault because liability would be strict.
d.
Intention.
Clear my choice



Question 5
Answer saved
Marked out of 2

Flag question

Question text
One of the attractions at Wonderland Zoo is a train ride that takes customers to and from
different locations at the zoo. Sipho, the technician in charge of inspecting and maintaining
the train, overlooks some signs that the train is no longer in sound condition. Avril goes for a
ride on the train. The operator of the train requests the persons boarding the train to fasten
their safety belts. However, Avril decides not to fasten her safety belt, because she wants to
take good selfie pictures during the ride. During the ride, the train breaks down and comes to
an abrupt standstill resulting in only Avril being thrown out of the train. Avril sustains a
broken arm and is hospitalised. Avril institutes a delictual claim against Wonderland Zoo for
her broken arm and hospital costs. Wonderland Zoo may rely on the following defence:

a.
_Volenti non fit iniuria_.
b.
The_ _“_talem qualem_”_ _rule.
c.
The “mitigation” of loss rule.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

, +27 67 171 1739

d.
Contributory negligence.
Clear my choice



Question 6
Not yet answered
Marked out of 2

Flag question

Question text
Daniel insulted Sifiso through a WhatsApp message. Sifiso, after reading the WhatsApp
message, got into his car and drove to Daniel’s place of work. Upon entering the premises of
Daniel’s place of work, Sifiso saw Daniel sitting in the cafeteria having lunch with his
colleagues. Sifiso walked towards Daniel, called him a fraud, a thief, and punched him in his
face. As a result of the impact of the punch, Daniel fell onto the glass dining table shattering
it to pieces. He sustained bodily injuries requiring hospitalisation. It transpired that even
though Daniel insulted Sifiso, Daniel did not commit fraud or steal anything. If Daniel wishes
to institute a delictual claim against Sifiso, the question whether there was fault on the part
of Sifiso will be answered with reference to the following:

a.
Infringement of a subjective right.
b.
Breach of a legal duty.
c.
Directing the will combined with consciousness of wrongfulness.
d.
The question whether the reasonable person would have foreseen and prevented the harm
in the circumstances.


Question 7
Not yet answered
Marked out of 2

Flag question

Question text
According to case law, if a motor vehicle is involved in an accident, the failure of a
passenger in that motor vehicle to fasten their seat belt:

a.
Can never constitute contributory negligence for the purpose of an apportionment of
damages.
b.
Can constitute contributory negligence for the purpose of an apportionment of damages
only if such failure contributed to the passenger’s injuries.
c.
Will always constitute contributory negligence for the purpose of an apportionment of
damages.
d.
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used to create this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without
any representations or warranties, express or implied. The author assumes no liability as a result of
reliance and use of the contents of this document. This document is to be used for comparison, research
and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any
form or by any means.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller iStudy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$3.99  34x  sold
  • (5)
  Add to cart