100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Criminal Law & Procedure: Criminal Law CA$21.64   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
  4.  
  5. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Exam (elaborations)

Criminal Law & Procedure: Criminal Law
 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
  • Institution
  • CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Requires an act coupled with a mental state Actus Reus - “Guilty Act” 1. Must committed in violation of some proscribed behavior - usually statutory 2. Omission - only where person had a legal duty to act (failure to file tax returns) 3. Guilty thoughts not punishable - even speaking or t...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

Document information

  • May 8, 2024
  • 8
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • criminal law procedure criminal law

Written for

  • CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
All documents for this subject (24)

Seller

avatar-seller
THEEXCELLENCELIBRARY

Reviews received

Content preview

Criminal Law & Procedure

Criminal Law

Requires an act coupled with a mental state

1Actus Reus - “Guilty Act”
1. Must committed in violation of some proscribed behavior - usually statutory
2. Omission - only where person had a legal duty to act (failure to file tax returns)
3. Guilty thoughts not punishable - even speaking or threatening to commit a crime is no
punishable

Mens Rea - “Wrongful Intent”
1. Requisite mental state necessary to establish guilt is specified in the applicable statute
2. Mental States
Purposefully/Intentionally
a. intends to bring about a certain criminal objective/ result
b. engages in certain criminal conduct accomplishing that objective
or cause a certain criminal result
Knowingly
a. conscious belief or awareness of the illegality of the conduct
b. willful blindness - suspect the criminal conduct exists but fails to
confirm it
Recklessly
a. consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk
b. usually requires a subjective belief that the risk existed when engaging
in the act
Negligently (not to be confused with Tort Law)
a. grossly deviates from the standard of care that a reasonable person
would use under the same circumstances
b. action takes an unjustified, substantial, and foreseeable risk resulting
in harm
3. Transferred Intent
(1) Unintended Victim
i. intended result happens to an unintended victim
ii. A aims gun at B with intent to kill B, shoots and misses
killing C
iii. A guilty of murdering C
(2) Unintended Manner
i. intended result happens to intended victim but in an
unintended manner
ii. A aims gun at B’s heart with intent to kill B, shoots and hits
B in the head killing him
iii. A guilty of murdering B
(3) Unintended Degree of Harm

, i. intended result does not happen but instead, a different
degree of unintended harm happens to intended victim
ii. A hits B with a stick intending to injure B, but kills B
instead
iii. A still guilty of killing B, although probably under a
recklessness theory
(4) Unintended Type of Harm
i. intended result does not happen and instead, a different
type of unintended harm happens (either to the intended
victim or a different victim)
ii. A throws rock at B with intent to injure B but misses,
accidentally breaking B’s (or C’s) window
iii. problem holding A guilty because no mens rea to cause a
different type of crime (concurrence required between mens
rea and resulting harm)

Corporate Criminal Liability
Corporations
1. Crimes committed by agents or employees acting within the course and
scope of their employment
2. Failing to perform a specific affirmative duty required by law Crimes
authorized, requested, commanded, committed, or recklessly tolerated by the
firm’s president, directors, officers or “high level managerial agents”
3. Corporate entity itself cannot form “intent” and cannot be imprisoned, but can
be fined and/ or have licenses to operate suspended or revoked.

Presidents, directors, officers & “high level managerial agents”
1. “Responsible Corporate Officer” doctrine: personally liable even in the
2. Absence of direct supervision, participation or knowledge of criminal
violation, if:
a. they have a reasonable relationship to the corporation, and
b. had the power to prevent the criminal violation
see United States v Hanousek, (11th edition, p. 207)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller THEEXCELLENCELIBRARY. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$21.64. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$21.64
  • (0)
  Add to cart