100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE PRACTICE TEST 2024 WITH ANS LATEST VERSION CA$22.34   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE PRACTICE TEST 2024 WITH ANS LATEST VERSION

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

1. Give three arguments in favor of the exclusionary rule as it currently stands, and three arguments against it. Then explain your position on the issue, supporting it with logical examples • The exclusionary rule ensures that immediate action is undertaken when a probable cause becomes establi...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

  • May 8, 2024
  • 12
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE PRACTICE
TEST 2024 WITH ANS LATEST VERSION
1. Give three arguments in favor of the exclusionary rule as it currently stands, and three

arguments against it. Then explain your position on the issue, supporting it with logical

examples

 The exclusionary rule ensures that immediate action is undertaken when a probable cause

becomes established.

 The exclusionary rule is vital for law enforcement behavioral compliance while ensuring

collected evidence integrity.

 The exclusionary rule prohibits constitutional violations associated with search and

seizures.

 The exclusionary rule may inadvertently dismiss admissible evidence.

 The exclusionary rule may prohibit the only physical or biological evidence linked to the

perpetrator.

 The exclusionary rule may result in a dismissal of dangerous individuals and should be

constitutionally evaluated to apply to today’s criminal behaviors.

2. The exclusionary rule was fashioned to deter police misconduct. The Supreme Court has

refused to implement it to cases where the misconduct was not by the police. Should the

exclusionary rule be extended to other public officers besides the police? Why or why not? If

so, to what other public officers should the rule apply?

 Yes, the exclusionary rule should extend to all individuals’ title color of the state. Public

officers that become aware of behavioral accountabilities tend to apply ethical and moral

decisions.

3. What was the effect of Mapp v. Ohio upon the criminal justice system?

, CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE PRACTICE
TEST 2024 WITH ANS LATEST VERSION
 Mapp v. Ohio (2017)1 established search, and seizure guidelines are making it illegal for

prosecutors to introduce evidence that becomes collected without search and seizure

warrants, violations of fourth amendment rights as well as interpreting constitutional

protections of unreasonable search and seizure associated with the 21st century.

4. The Court has held that probable cause is necessary for a station house detention

accompanied by interrogation as opposed to just fingerprinting even if no expressed arrest is

made. Do you agree with this holding Support your position?

 As long as probable cause established and the interrogation accompanied by Miranda

warnings, and agreeing with the statutory procedure would be acceptable. However, if no

expressed arrest made, there can be no Miranda warning administered. Thus, no probable

cause would exist warranting the interrogation process.

5. Stops based on race alone are not valid, but there is disagreement whether race can be taken

as one factor in determining reasonable suspicion for a stop. Under what circumstances

should race be allowed as one factor in determining reasonable suspicion for a stop. Give an

example to support your conclusion.

 The only situation I see that warrants utilizing race as a basis of reasonable suspicion

would be in a community that only has one cultural background. For example, it would

be hard to claim discrimination if a white officer stopped the black man in an entirely

black community. Same goes for Hispanic communities, Portuguese communities, and

the Oriental communities so forth and so on.




1
Mapp v. Ohio, LII / Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/367/643 (last
visited Feb 21, 2017).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller THEEXCELLENCELIBRARY. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$22.34. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73243 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$22.34
  • (0)
  Add to cart