100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Cases Questions with 100% correct answers | verified | latest update 2024 CA$11.53   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Cases Questions with 100% correct answers | verified | latest update 2024

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Cases Questions with 100% correct answers | verified | latest update 2024

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • June 17, 2024
  • 4
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Bar Exam - Practice & Procedure Cases
Calderbank - ANS-- without prejudice offers;
- formal offer procedure is UCPR 20.26
- relevant in relation to costs

Small - ANS-UCPR 33.4 setting aside a subpoena
Man fell from train

Consolidated Credit - ANS-UCPR 14.11 late admission of affidavit

Cardile - ANS-Freezing Order against a third party
UCPR 25.14 and Practice Note General 14

Hans Pet Constructions - ANS-Civil Procedure Act Section 57 - objects of case
management.
- magistrate erred in striking out defence as a punishment for late filing of evidence.
- magistrate failed to account for interests of justice after Hans Pet gave evidence so
close to deadline that the other party did not have time to file a defence.
- magistrates decision overruled on lack of evidence that he considered section 57
factors.

Expense Reduction - ANS-UCPR 21.2 Inadvertent disclosure of privileged documents.
- duty to court - overriding purpose of civil proceedings; section 56(3) and 56(4) Civil
Procedure Act.
- duty to client - not to put client in breach of duty to the court section 56(4) civil
procedure act.
- solicitors owe fellow practitioners a duty to return all inadvertently disclosed
documents reasonably suspected to be confidential.

Bi v Mourad - ANS-UCPR 12.7 summary dismissal for want of due despatch.
- 9 years elapsed since events various indugences given to plaintiffs.
- sections 55-60 Civil Procedure Act - dismissal for want of prosecution.
- claim for damages for negligence or nuisance from excavation works of adjoining
property, damages of $257,000 claimed, hearing dates vacated due to amendment to
plaintiffs pleadings.

Thomas A Edison Ltd v Bullock - ANS-Supreme Court Act section 66 Injunction.
Ex parte injunction = duty of candour.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Hkane. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$11.53. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


CA$11.53
  • (0)
  Add to cart