Exam (elaborations)
Louisiana POST (updated to pass)question and answers
- Course
- Post License
- Institution
- Post License
Louisiana POST (updated to pass)question and answers
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Louisiana POST (updated topass)question and answer
Kirby v. Illinois - CORRECT ANSWER-The sixth and Fourth amendment rights to
counsel do not apply to pre-indictment identification procedures.
US v. Wade - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that a lineup or other face to face
confrontation after the accused has been formally charged with an offense is
considered a critical stage of proceedings; therefore the accused has a right to
have counsel present.
Tennessee v. Garner - CORRECT ANSWER-Deadly force may not be used
against an unarmed and fleeing suspect unless necessary to prevent the escape
and unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a
significant threat of death or serious injury to the officers or others.
Katz v. US - CORRECT ANSWER-warrantless wiretaps violate the 4th
Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona - CORRECT ANSWER-Supreme Court held that criminal
suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their
right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police.
Watson v US - CORRECT ANSWER-An arrest warrant is not required to arrest a
suspected felon in a public place if probable cause for arrest exists
Terry v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that a police officer on less than
probable cause for arrest, may pat down a suspicious person whom he has
reason to believe presents a present danger to himself or others
Chimel v. California - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that a police officer, after
making a lawful arrest, could legally search only the area within the arrestee's
immediate control. Arm-span or wing-span theory
, Pennsylvania v. Mimms - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that police officers can
compel a driver to step out of his car when stopping him for a minor traffic
violation
Gideon v. Wainwright - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that the fourth amendment
requires the appointment of counsel for indigent defendants in state criminal
cases whether the offense is capital or non capital
Draper v. U.S. (1959) - CORRECT ANSWER-Information obtained from a
proven, reliable informant is good enough to establish probable cause in order to
obtain a search warrant.
Schmerber v. California - CORRECT ANSWER-held that the taking of physical
evidence such as a blood sample over objection did not violate defendants
constitutional rights and is admissible in evidence
Caroll v US - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that automobiles and conveyances
being highly mobile, may be searched without a warrant in circumstances that
will not justify the search without a warrant of a house or an office provided there
is probable cause to believe they contain articles that the officers are entitled to
see use i.e. contraband
US v. Robinson - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that the Fourth Amendment
PERMITS a warrantless search incident to a lawful custodial arrest of motorist.
Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANSWER-Held that evidence obtained in violation of
the fourth amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures was
inadmissible in state criminal prosecutions by virtue of the due process clause of
the 14th amendment known as the exclusionary rule
New York v. Belton - CORRECT ANSWER-the constitutionally permissible scope
of a search incident to a lawful custodial arrest extends to the passenger
compartment of the automobile in which the person was riding
First Amendment - CORRECT ANSWER-5 freedoms: speech, press, religion,
assembly, petition
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TUTORSON. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$18.60. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now