100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lecture Notes PSYC 1010 - Introduction to Psychology (Lectures 1-4) CA$10.48   Add to cart

Class notes

Lecture Notes PSYC 1010 - Introduction to Psychology (Lectures 1-4)

 47 views  0 purchase

Lecture Notes of PSYC 1010 - Introduction to Psychology of lectures 1, 2, 3, 4 covering textbook modules 1, 2, 3, 44, 45, 46; at York University, Toronto, Canada.

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • July 31, 2024
  • 5
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • Dr. rebecca jubis
  • Hh/psyc 1010 lectures 1, 2, 3, 4 (covering everything for test 1)
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
dtay
Lecture 1
September 8, 2023 2:30 PM
THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
MODULE 2 - RESEARCH METHODS
Hindsight Bias: The tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that one would have foreseen it.
Also known as I-knew-it-all-along phenomenon.
It can be dangerous.

Scientific Methods: In Psychology, scientists rely on scientific methods which are based upon:
◊ Empirical Data = info/data you get from direct study, not based on assumption, hindsight bias, etc.
Which consists of:
◊ Theory (a coherent network of explanatory ideas)
◊ Hypothesis (a testable prediction, derived from a theory)

Operational Definitions: Explicitly defining all terms & procedures so that the study could be replicated.
▫ Theory: We can NEVER prove a theory, because to do that you have to prove every single instance, which generally doesn’t happen.
▫ Research: Conduct study/research, if any FLAWS in the findings, re-do the study.
Therefore, there shouldn't be any flaws in the outcomes of the study to test the hypothesis.
▫ The result one study is just a "piece of puzzle" and a part of the theory-building process.




Research Methods:
❖ Survey Method: Information on people's attitude, believes, behaviors is gathered in a questionnaire or interview.
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Fast & Practical Large sample/subjects required
Efficient Question interpretation problems
Sample
Cheap (if done online) Unmatched, target, audience
Anonymous (so people feel quite comfortable, so they are more honest) Dishonesty/lazy replies (no seriousness/boring/frustrated)
Limitation in 'yes or no' question "mini version of
the main interest"
○ So if your result/outcome is true for the 1000 people you surveyed, but, is it true for more 5000 people? Population
• Population = group of interest.
• Sample = the smaller group that you actually study.
○ To generalize from a sample to the population of interest, the sample must be representative of the population (it must be a "mini version"). "main interest"
○ A sample that isn't representative, is called a Biased Sample.
○ How to get a representative sample? = by Random Sampling.
• Random Sampling: is where each person in the population has an equal chance of getting selected for the sample.


❖ Naturalistic Observation: This method is used if you are interested in describing/measuring people's natural behaviour in their natural habitat.
Advantages: Disadvantages:
People are behaving naturally so that you can Researcher doesn't have control over natural situations.
generalise results.
Time consuming & Disturbances
Misinterpreted behaviour
Bad timings of their usual, typical behaviour which may lead to wrong data.
Researcher's presence can influence their habitat.

○ So before conducting this type of observation, you need to have a BEHAVIOURAL CHECKLIST, because there is so much going on in their habitat,
but you need to only be focused on one type of their behaviour.
○ You need to minimize subject/participant reactivity (your influence in their habitat can change their behaviour):
▪ Video record their behaviour: It is ethical as long as it is being done in public in the presence of the subject & not invading their privacy or
habitat.
□ With video recording, you can replay to observe better, but sometimes you can get biased or make assumptions while replaying.
□ To avoid this, have 2 people observe the video recording to eliminate the wrong data/flaws (INTER-OBSERVER RELIABILITY).
▪ Have a participant observer: They are the participant in the research, while also observing the habitat.
□ Be carful, as suspicious participant's behaviour may also influence a stable habitat.

○ Experimenter Bias (Expectancy): Researcher's expectations could bias the observations. It’s a good practice to use 2 observers & determine
inter-observer reliability (look for consistency in their observations) .
▪ Power of Observation!


 PILOT STUDY: Before conducting a research/study, the researcher must conduct a pilot study.
□ It is typically a small-scale version of a larger research project.
□ Its purpose is to test the feasibility of the larger project & also to gather preliminary data that can be used to inform the design of the larger study.




Test -1 Page 1

, Lecture 2
September 15, 2023 2:00 PM THINKING CRITICALLY WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
MODULE 2 - RESEARCH METHODS
Research Methods:
❖ Experimental method: It manipulates (varies) certain variables/factors and controls others (holds other variables/factor constant).
Advantages Disadvantages
You can infer, cause and effect the subject. Not behaving naturally (This method is usually done in a lab, so the subject may be
nervous or anxious).
You can have control over the other variables or Expensive (paying your subjects, lab, assistants, materials).
situations.

○ There are 2 very important variables/factors to conduct an experiment research:

1. INDEPENDENT VARIABLE (IV): Questions based on
□ The variable that the experiment varies/changes/manipulates to see if it actually affects the behaviour. the above variables,
□ In an experiment, the factor that is manipulated; the variable whose effect is being studied. will come with a
□ The situation that the subject is exposed to. scenario question in
□ Cause. which you have to
identify which is IV &
2. DEPENDANT VARIABLES (DV): DV.
□ The behaviour that’s measured to see if the independent variable (IV) had an effect.
□ In an experiment, a factor other than the factor being studied that might influence a study’s results.
□ Effect.

○ IV is the cause & DV is effect of the cause.

○ A variable that YOU DO NOT NEED/OR WANT in your experiment research:

1. CONFOUNDING VARIABLE:
□ It interferes with the result of the study.
□ It changes with the IV and can effect the DV.
□ So you don’t know what variable is causing behavior and can’t draw a conclusion.

○ So in any experiment, its important for you to have:

1. A Control Group:
□ It is used as a standard for comparison.
□ This group gets the "0" level of IV.
□ All other groups are called "experimental groups".
□ All groups must be equal to one another except for the IV.
□ Control groups are necessary to determine whether the IV is actually the one that caused the effect (data) you get.

2. Placebo Control Group:
(used in drug-related studies where people might have strong expectations about drug effects)

□ A special type of control group that is used to control for subjects’ expectations that could affect results.
□ If the control group gets a placebo, then it’s assumed that all groups (the control & experimental group) are equal in
terms of their expectation, and so, any differences in behavior (memory) can be attributed solely to the amount of
alcohol/rug consumed, and not to expectation.
□ Just because of the expectation of the subject, it effects the outcome.

1. Random assignment to groups:
□ This is different from random sampling.
□ By randomly assigning subjects to groups, you're assuming that all individual difference variables are being evenly
distributed among groups so that the groups end up being equal.


❖ Correlational Method: It measures the degree of relationship between 2 variables.
○ Or in other words, It measures the degree to which 2 variables change together.
○ There's no attempt to manipulate or control variables.
○ Rather, naturally occurring variations on both variables are measured to see if they are related.
○ Correlations help us make predictions.

○ Scatterplot graph:
▪ a graph that shows correlational data; each dot represents one person’s 2 corresponding scores.
▪ The closer the dots are to a straight line, the closer or better they are in relation to predict an outcome.

○ Correlation coefficient:
▪ To know exactly how two variables are related we calculate the correlation coefficient (r) by entering all subjects’ 2 scores
in a statistical formula.

R = ± and a number
Questions will be asked
from this topic, but they
□ The number tells you the strength of the relationship.
wouldn't ask to find the
□ It tells us how strong is the predictability .
value of R.
□ That number is ALWAYS between 0 & 1; Never greater or lesser than 1 or 0 because that’s impossible.
□ 1.00 is a prefect correlation.
□ In psychology; 7, 7.5-8.5 is a pretty good & higher correlation.
□ In psychology; 5-6.5 is a moderate correlation.


□ The + or – sign indicates the direction of the relationship.
□ POSITIVE CORRELATION - the values of both variables changes in the SAME direction (as the value of one variable
increases, the value of the other variable also increases).
□ NEGATIVE CORRELATION - the values of both variables change in the OPPOSITE direction (as the value of one
variables increases the value of the other variable decreases).

○ You cannot infer cause-and-effect:
▪ Because you don’t manipulate some variables and control others.
▪ If two variables are correlated it could be that: The slope goes from down to up - Positive correlation. The slope goes from up to down - Negative correlation.
□ A causes B (e.g. low self-esteem causes depression).
□ B causes A (e.g. depression causes low self-esteem).
□ There’s a 3rd underlying variable that causes both A and B (a biological predisposition causes you to have low self -
esteem AND make you depressed).


 EXPERIMENTER EXPENTANCY EFFECTS:
• The experimenter has a hypothesis and expects certain results.
• Sometimes he/she can convey that expectation to subjects in a subtle way, such that the subject ends up behaving according
to expectation, thus confirming the hypothesis.

○ Self-fulfilling Prophecy:
• Your expectation can influence your behaviour & other(s) behaviour.
• And what ends up happening is that other's behaviour confirms your expectations.
• So, your expectation is the hypothesis here, and other's behaviour confirms/results outcome of your hypothesis.

○ How to minimize experimenter expectancy effects/experimenter bias:
• Double-blind Study: Both the subject & the experimenter are unaware of the conditions the subject was randomly
assigned to.
• Minimize the amount of time you spend with the subject to avoid socialising & influencing.
• Online study/experiments where the subject only interacts with a computer.




Test -1 Page 2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dtay. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$10.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$10.48
  • (0)
  Add to cart