Exam (elaborations)
LEB 320F Cases Exam Questions and Answers
- Course
- Institution
LEB 320F Cases Exam Questions and Answers
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
millyphilip
Reviews received
Content preview
LEB 320F Cases Exam Questions and AnswersWagenseller vs. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital - Answer -Independent exposure (public policy exception. Refused to expose genitals during camping trip with supervisor and co-workers
Olsen v. Northern FS, Inc - Answer -Disparate treatment. Fired due to old age and replaced with 22 year old with no sales experience
Redd v. New York State Division of Parole - Answer -Hostile work environment. Supervisor (recently promoted) touched her breasts
Ricci v. Destefano - Answer -Disparate impact. Fire-fighters promotion given to whites than minorities
Lazar v. Thermal Equipment - Answer -Doctrine Respondeat Superior. Injury because employee driving outside workplace and home. Going and Coming Rule
Texas A & M University v. Bishop - Answer -Doctrine Respondeat Superior. Drama club
had real knives for Dracula play and caused injury. Independent contractors are liable for own tort not employer
Industrial Molded Plastic Products vs. J.Gross & Sons - Answer -Apparent authority. Gross not bound by agreement to purchase product because agent didn't have authority
to sign contract
Girard vs. Myers - Answer -Duty of Loyalty. Duty of Loyalty owed by agent to principal with sales of commission for selling land
Schupach v. McDonald's Systems - Answer -Novation case. McDonald's not give permission to transfer right
Shattuck v. Klotzbach - Answer -Common Law Rule of writing is sufficient to satisfy statue of frauds. Property sale of 1.8 million via email not satisfy requirements. Must be in writing with signatures Castillo v. Rios - Answer -Easement case for Sale of Land. Plaintiff rented house for 2 years and need to buy. Employer put downpayment. Plaintiff made 35k improvements with employees
Totem Marine Tug & Barge v Alyeska Pipeline - Answer -Economic Duress case. Defendant withheld payment of invoice. Plaintiff had to pay debts because no realistic alternative.
Beachcomber Coins v. Boskett - Answer -Mutual Mistake Act. Defendant sold rare coin for $500 but later learned it was fake
Doughty v Idaho Frozen Foods - Answer -Unconscionability case, Plaintiff's potatoes smaller compared to local market. But losing money isn't unconscionable
Seigneur v National Fitness Institute - Answer -Exculpatory Clause. Defendant free from
liability because didn't intend to harm Plaintiff in shoulder injury
Systems & Software Inc v Barnes - Answer -Covenant case not to compete. Defendant can't work 6 months with competitor after he left because singed non competition agreement
Benay v Warner Bros Entertainment - Answer -Direct Copyright Infringement. Defendants movie (work) similar to protected expression in Plaintiff's screenplay (work). Plaintiff's case rejected because it didn't pass test of extrinsic or intrinsic
Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Service - Answer -Infringement of Copyright. Defendant's white pages lack originality and only had facts. Copyright rewards originality not effort
SunTrust bank vs. Houghton Mifflin - Answer -Fair-Use case. Parody for fictional work
Larmi Crop vs. Alan Amron - Answer -Infringement case. Water gun petition is similar
Association for Molecule Pathology vs. Myriad Genetics - Answer -Patent case. Line between discover and inventions. Defendant found BRACA 1&2. Laws of nature are abstract and not patentable because basic tools of scientific technological works
Integrated Cash Management Services vs. Digital Transaction - Answer -
Misappropriation case. Former employee takes confidential information with him in memory to next job
E.I du Pont de Nemours vs. Christopher - Answer -Misappropriation case. Plaintiff took protective measures but Defendant flew airplane and took picture of trade secrets.
UT vs. KST Electric - Answer -Trademark Infringement and Dilution. Plaintiff has burden
of proof of famousness but this is niche market fame
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller millyphilip. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$15.92. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
77988 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now