100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LEB 320F Featured Cases Exam Questions and Answers 100% correct CA$14.46   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

LEB 320F Featured Cases Exam Questions and Answers 100% correct

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • LEB 320F
  • Institution
  • LEB 320F

LEB 320F Featured Cases Exam Questions and Answers

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • August 2, 2024
  • 3
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • LEB 320F
  • LEB 320F
avatar-seller
LEB 320F Featured Cases Exam Questions and Answers
Podias v. Mairs (Law/Ethics) - Answer -Case: Mairs was driving 2 friends (who were asleep) after all drank beer. Mairs lost control and struck motorcyclist Podias. All exited the car, no one called for assistance (instead called other ppl) then abandoned him, car ran over motorcyclist afterward. Mairs said he was alone, lied to police.
Plaintiff: Podias
Defendant: Mairs
Action: Sued for negligence and Mairs found liable, but Swanson and Newell granted summary judgment bc no legal duty to volunteer assistance.
Result: Reversed, Remanded. There is enough evidence to impose a duty on the defendants given the immediate danger the motorcyclist was in and the ease with which
the death could've been prevented through simple steps.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) v. Superior Court (Personal Jurisdiction) - Answer -
Case: 600 mostly non-California residents filed against BMS(pharma company) in California for drug-related injuries. BMS incorp in Delaware and HQ in NY. 5 labs in , sales reps, and state-gvt advocacy office in Cali. Didn't develop the drug, manufacture, package, do marketing strategy, etc in Cali. Action: BMS filed special apppearance for lack of personal jurisdiction. Cali Supreme Court said they have special personal jurisdiction, BMS appealed.
Result: Reversed. No specific personal jurisdiction because too many nonresidents that didn't suffer harm in Cali and because specific conduct occurred elsewhere. Plus, not enough specific activities in Cali.
Gonzales v Raich (Commerce Clause) - Answer -Case: Legal to use medicinal marijuana, Raich grows her own for medicinal purposes (and recommended by physician). Raided by DEA, and sought relief.
Action: Ruled against Raich, then reversed. Attorney General Gonzales appealed.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller millyphilip. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$14.46. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77988 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$14.46
  • (0)
  Add to cart