100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
SEP1501 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due September 2024 CA$3.89   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  4.  
  5. Security Principles and Practices (SEP1501)

Exam (elaborations)

SEP1501 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due September 2024

1 review
 144 views  5 purchases
  • Course
  • Security Principles and Practices (SEP1501)
  • Institution
  • University Of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Book
  • Cryptography And Network Security: Principles And Practices 4Th Ed.

SEP1501 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2024 | Due September 2024. All questions answered with references. SECTION A QUESTION 1 Briefly explain when a security official can rely on “private defense”. Provide an example in support of your answer. [5] QUESTION 2 Name and describe the different el...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

Document information

  • August 30, 2024
  • 9
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • sep1501 assignment 2 semester 2 2024

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

Written for

  • University of South Africa (Unisa)
  • Security Principles and Practices (SEP1501)
All documents for this subject (1)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: xolisilentshali2 • 1 month ago

Seller

avatar-seller
Aimark94

Reviews received

Content preview

, PLEASE USE THIS DOCUMENT AS A GUIDE TO ANSWER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Please note that the author of this document will not responsibility for any plagiarizing you
commit.

 Question 1

1. Briefly explain when a security official can rely on “private defense”. Provide an example in
support of your answer.

"Private defense," also known as self-defense, is a legal principle that allows individuals, including
security officials, to use force to protect themselves, others, or property against an imminent and
unlawful attack. This principle is grounded in the idea that the law does not require a person to
passively endure harm when they have the means to prevent it. For security officials, who often find
themselves in situations where they must confront potential threats, understanding and appropriately
applying private defense is crucial.

When Security Officials Can Rely on Private Defense
A security official can invoke the right to private defense under specific conditions:

 Imminence of Threat: The threat must be immediate and unavoidable. Private defense cannot
be claimed if the threat is hypothetical, distant, or can be avoided by retreating or calling for
help. The law recognizes the right to defend oneself only when there is no other viable option.

 Unlawfulness of Attack: The attack must be unlawful. If a security official is faced with an
unlawful act, such as an armed robbery, they are entitled to use force to protect themselves or
others. However, the force used must be in response to an actual unlawful attack, not merely a
perceived or anticipated one.

 Proportionality of Force: The force used in defense must be proportional to the threat posed.
This means that the level of force must not exceed what is necessary to prevent the harm. For
instance, using lethal force might be justified if the security official is facing a deadly threat,
such as an armed assailant, but not if the threat is non-lethal.

 Protection of Life and Property: Security officials are often responsible for safeguarding
both people and property. The law permits them to use force to protect either, provided the
conditions of imminence, unlawfulness, and proportionality are met. For example, if an armed
individual attempts to break into a secure facility, the security official may use necessary force
to prevent the intrusion.

Example of Private Defense in Action
Consider a situation where a security official is patrolling a facility late at night. An intruder, armed
with a knife, attempts to overpower the official to gain access to restricted areas. The intruder’s
actions clearly pose an imminent and unlawful threat to the security official’s life. In this scenario,
the security official is justified in using force, potentially even lethal force, to defend themselves and
prevent the attack. The official’s actions would be covered under the right to private defense, as they
were responding to an immediate threat with appropriate force.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Aimark94. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$3.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79271 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$3.89  5x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart