100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
MEJO 341 FINAL UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers CA$13.72   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. MEJO 341
  4.  
  5. MEJO 341

Exam (elaborations)

MEJO 341 FINAL UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers
 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • MEJO 341
  • Institution
  • MEJO 341

MEJO 341 FINAL UPDATED Actual Exam Questions and CORRECT Answers What are the 4 types of law? - CORRECT ANSWER- Common, statutory, constitutional, administrative The Golden Rule - CORRECT ANSWER- Was there a reasonable expectation to privacy? Net neutrality - CORRECT ANSWER- -the principle...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 40  pages

Document information

  • September 16, 2024
  • 40
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • mejo 341 final
  • mejo 341
  • mejo

Written for

  • MEJO 341
  • MEJO 341

Seller

avatar-seller
MGRADES

Reviews received

Content preview

MEJO 341 FINAL UPDATED Actual Exam
Questions and CORRECT Answers
What are the 4 types of law? - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Common, statutory, constitutional,
administrative


The Golden Rule - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Was there a reasonable expectation to
privacy?


Net neutrality - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-the principle that traffic on the Internet is not
privileged
-all packets (data) travel equally (in theory)
-i.e. your blog has an equal chance of being seen as does the NYTimes


commercial speech - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔advertising



FCC and net neutrality - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Tried to encourage net neutral
principles, labeling ISPs "information providers" they could regulate


Federal Trade Commission (FTC) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-created in 1914 by FTC Act
-regulatory branch
-writes administrative law
-created to prevent companies from using false and deceptive ads for unfair competition - to
create a monopoly
-body of commissioners (5) three from the party power, two from minority party


Third Party Doctrine - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-Information lawfully held by third parties
is treated differently. It can be obtained by subpoenaing the third party, by securing the third
party's consent or by any other means of legal discovery; the "owner" has no role in the
matter, and, often, no search warrant is required. (Smith v. Maryland, 1979)
-Notion that a person who surrenders information to a third party consents to that third party's
disclosure of such information to others.

,Common Law - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Law that comes out of the courts



Stare decisis - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔"let the decision stand"



Common Carrier - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-A business using some public good that gov't
must regulate in the interest of all
-common carrier is the preferred legal designation to fully regulate telecomm companies


Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔BAD LAW
said purely commercial speech is not be the first amendment


Third Party Doctrine - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Global Positioning System tracking case,
U.S. v. Jones (2012). Police cannot attach a GPS device to a suspect's car without a warrant.
Riley v. California (2014): The police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital
information on a cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested.


Precedent - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔basis for all other decision in that subject going
forward


FCC v. Verizon (DC Cir. 2014) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-Verizon & more challenged the
FCC's authority to regulate their businesses and the "Open Internet Order" that said that
businesses can't discriminate traffic
-Verizon & more wanted to discriminate traffic on the internet to improve streaming services
and charge high bandwidth customers more
-DC Cir. ruled that while FCC has authority to regulate the Internet, "Open Internet Order"
was not within their power
-To have that power, FCC must declare broadband providers to be "common carriers" (like
phone companies); FCC had classified them as "information providers"
-FCC had been hesitant to declare internet a common carrier


NY Times v. Sullivan (1964) - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔weakened rule from Valentine v.
Christense by protecting editorial ads

,Third Party Doctrine - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Justice Sonia Sotomayor's concurrence in
Jones described the third-party records doctrine as "ill-suited to the digital age, in which
people reveal a great deal of information about themselves to third parties in the course of
carrying out mundane tasks."


Types of Privacy Claims - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Publication torts
Newsgathering torts
A tort is a type of injury...a wrong against someone


Due process of law - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔same expectations to the way law applies to
all of us


Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976) - CORRECT
ANSWER- ✔✔SCOTUS reverses precedent set in Valentine v. Christensen, commercial
speech now protected


Open Internet Order - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Kept: Transparency requirement
Ditched: Anti-blocking requirement; Anti-discrimination requirement


judicial restraint vs. judicial activism - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔those who practice judicial
restraint have a greater willingness to accept lower court decisions and defer to other
branches of government.


Judicial activism is wanting to challenge them


New FCC Rules - Adopted Feb. 2015 - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-No blocking: broadband
providers may not block access to legal content, applications, services, or non-harmful
devices
-No throttling: broadband providers may not impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the
basis of content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices
-no paid prioritization: broadband providers may not favor some lawful internet traffic over
other lawful traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind - aka no fast lanes. Also bans
ISPs from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates

, Protections of commercial speech - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-Commercial speech
undergoes the intermediate scrutiny test
--"substantial interest to regulate the speech"
-false commercial speech NOT protected
-Prior restraints are allowed
-Can be compelled


Publication torts - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔These include three privacy torts
Appropriation
False Light
Public disclosure of embarrassing private facts


Statutory Law - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔Made by legislators. On the federal, state, or
local level


Just and Reasonable Conduct provision - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-allows the FCC to
decide what is acceptable on a case-by-case basis
-Congress?
-v current event
-American Commitment - Koch brothers' group delivers 540,000 signatures to congress vs.
140 startups (etsy, buzzfeed, tumblr, kickstarter, etc) signing a letter to the FCC thanking
them


Why are we harsher on commercial speech? - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔-comm. speech is
hardier -- advertisers won't be intimidated like political speech
-comm. speech can be verified


Appropriation - CORRECT ANSWER- ✔✔The use of a person's name or image for
commercial purposes without that person's permission
Celebrities suffer a violation of "right of publicity"
Private people suffer emotional distress due to shame and humiliation - commercialization of
their identity
Recognized in NC

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MGRADES. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$13.72. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$13.72
  • (0)
  Add to cart