100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER AND SERVER EXAM CA$15.13   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER AND SERVER EXAM

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER
  • Institution
  • ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER

ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER AND SERVER EXAM ...

Preview 3 out of 25  pages

  • September 20, 2024
  • 25
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown
  • ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER
  • ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS FOR DATA CENTER
avatar-seller
ACP-610 MANAGING JIRA PROJECTS
FOR DATA CENTER AND SERVER
EXAM 2024-2025

You need to determine the best way to meet these requirements:
• allow four separate functional teams to work in a single project
• use a field to designate the functional area for each issue
• allow each team to focus only on their own issues without a lot of
maintenance
• allow each team to view a Burndown Chart of only their own issues

Which approach will meet all requirements?

A. Use components to designate functional areas and create four boards
filtered by component.
B. Use versions to designate functional areas and create four boards
with sub-filters by version.
C. Use components to designate functional areas and create a single
board with four quick filters by component.
D. Use versions to designate functional areas and create a single board
with four swimlanes by version. - ANSWER A. Correct. We just have one
project and different users need a different view of the data. Clustering
issues by using components is a standard use case. If each team needs
a separate burndown, they need to have multiple boards. Limiting the
scope by filtering on the component will be sufficient.
B. Incorrect. Teams need a burndown. Burndown reports are only
available on a Scrum board but Scrum boards don't have sub-filters.
C. Incorrect. Quick filters cannot be applied to the burndown report.
D. Incorrect. Swimlanes will not meet the requirements. Especially not
the need for
individual burndown charts.

Your Scrum project only uses a single workflow. The workflow is shared
with several other projects. You want to make sure users manually
select and set a resolution during a particular transition.

,As a project administrator, how can you achieve this?

A. Request a screen with the Resolution field to be associated with the
transition,
B. Request a post function that sets the Resolution to be added to the
transition.
C. Check the 'Set resolution' option on the target status in the board
configuration.
D. Add the Resolution field to a transition screen and associate it with
the transition. - ANSWER A. Correct. The Jira administrator needs to
associate a transition screen (which has the Resolution field on it) with
the workflow transition.
B. Incorrect. Users will not be able to manually select an appropriate
resolution if it is set automatically by a post function.
C. Incorrect. The 'Set resolution' option is available only on a simplified
workflow and, if available, the option only adds a standard resolution.
Users will not be able to manually select an appropriate resolution.
D. Incorrect. The board/project administrator cannot fields to transition
screens.

Foogie has the following requirements:
• remove issues from the board that have been resolved for longer than
4 weeks
• do it in such a way that the issues still show up on reports Identify two
different ways to achieve this. (Choose two.)

A. modify the board sub-filter
B. modify the board filter
C. adjust the 'Hide completed issues older than' setting
D. enable the Kanban backlog
E. remove the Done column from the board - ANSWER A. Correct.
Using a sub-filter allows us to hide issues that have been resolved for
longer than 4 weeks without affecting the underlying board reports.
B. Incorrect. Using a board filter will affect reports such as the
Cumulative Flow Diagram.
C. Correct. The 'Hide completed issues older than' configuration hides
issues that have been resolved for longer than 4 weeks without affecting
the underlying board reports.

, D. Incorrect. The Kanban backlog hides all issues that have a specific
status from the board completely.
E. Incorrect. Removing the Done column from the board hides all issues
that are in a status mapped to the column completely.

You notice a discrepancy:
• In search results, you see 20 issues in Open and Review statuses in
your project.
• On the project board, you see only 10 issues in the Open and Review
columns.

Which three configurations might explain this behavior?
(Choose three.)

A. board filter
B. board sub-filter
C. column mapping
D. issue-level security
E. project permission
F. global permission - ANSWER A. Correct. This question combines
knowledge of board configurations and issue visibility. A board filter does
not necessarily show all the project issues. The filter query might be
excluding some issues based on either the status itself or other criteria
like labels or custom field value. If so, then the board will show fewer
issues. In other situations, the board filter might be including more
issues than you see in search results (i.e. if it is returning issues from
multiple projects).
B. Correct. If this is a Kanban board (which we are not told), then it has a
sub-filter. The default query in the sub-filter is 'fixVersion in
unreleasedVersions( OR fixVersion is EMPTY' but it doesn't have to be.
It could be changed to exclude issues based on other criteria. If so, then
the board will show fewer issues.
C. Correct. Just because the column names are Open and Review does
not necessarily mean that those statuses are mapped to those columns.
It's possible that different statuses are mapped to either/both columns.
D. Incorrect. Issue-level security (if enabled for a project) affects issue
visibility everywhere in Jira. If an issue had a Security Level, then you
could see it in neither the board nor search results.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luzlinkuz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$15.13. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$15.13
  • (0)
  Add to cart