100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Social Psychology Exam 2 Part Extra Study Guide. CA$16.59   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Yale University
  4.  
  5. PSYC.

Exam (elaborations)

Social Psychology Exam 2 Part Extra Study Guide.
 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • PSYC.
  • Institution
  • Yale University

Social Psychology Exam 2 Part Extra Study Guide. Dabbs and Leventhal Study 1966 - CORRECT ANSWER In the mid 1960's, Howard Leventhal, a social psychologist from Yale University, USA, invited a group of 30 senior students to participate in what they thought was an experiment on a public health br...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • September 29, 2024
  • 4
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • psyc
  • social psychology exam 2 part extra study guide

Written for

  • Yale University
  • PSYC.
All documents for this subject (24)

Seller

avatar-seller
ROSEGRADES

Reviews received

Content preview

Social Psychology Exam 2 Part Extra
Study Guide.
Dabbs and Leventhal Study 1966 - CORRECT ANSWER In the mid 1960's, Howard Leventhal, a social
psychologist from Yale University, USA, invited a group of 30 senior students to participate in what they
thought was an experiment on a public health brochure evaluation. The tetanus pamphlet, as it was
called, was to be evaluated for its persuasiveness in communicating the dangers of tetanus and the
importance of inoculation.

To that effect, the students read the pamphlet, carefully analysed its contents and filled out the
evaluation report. When they were done they handed it to the experimenter and went on their merry
way thinking the experiment was over. In reality, though, the experiment had just begun.

While Leventhal really was trying to measure the persuasiveness of the pamphlet, his measure of
effectiveness was not how persuasive the participants thought or said it was but how it actually affected
their behaviour. He wanted to see how many of the participants would subsequently get vaccinated. To
make things interesting, he gave different students different pamphlets.

Those in the 'high fear' group received booklets with powerful language describing the risks of
contracting tetanus and vividly frightening images to show what it did to people. For those in the low
fear group, the experimenters toned down the language and took out the distressing images.

Leventhal wanted to see if higher fear levels in the pamphlet would lead to a higher number of
participants seeking inoculation.

It did not. After making regular checks with the medical centre for over a month, Leventhal found that
only one person out of the whole group had subsequently got the vaccination. Apart from scaring the
living day lights out of the participants, the fear appeal, and especially the high fear appeal, did nothing
to persuade the participants to seek vaccination.

Why Did the Fear Fail To Persu



Miller, Brickman, Bolen Study - CORRECT ANSWER The present research compared the relative
effectiveness of an attribution strategy with a persuasion strategy in changing behavior. Study 1
attempted to teach fifth graders not to litter and to clean up after others. An attribution group was
repeatedly told that they were neat and tidy people, a persuasion group was repeatedly told that they
should be neat and tidy, and a control group received no treatment. Attribution proved considerably
more effective in modifying behavior. Study 2 tried to discover whether similar effects would hold for a
more central aspect of school performance, math achievement and self-esteem, and whether an
attribution of ability would be as effective as an attribution of motivation. Repeatedly attributing to
second graders either the ability or the motivation to do well in math proved more effective than
comparable persuasion or no-treatment control groups, although a group receiving straight
reinforcement for math problem-solving behavior also did well. It is suggested that persuasion often

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ROSEGRADES. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$16.59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$16.59
  • (0)
  Add to cart