100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Case Studies LEB 320F Final Exam Questions with Complete Solutions CA$26.88   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Case Studies LEB 320F Final Exam Questions with Complete Solutions

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • LEB 320F
  • Institution
  • LEB 320F

*One A Day Multivitamin Gummies* - Answer-> Vitamins are supposed to be good for you, but are these good for you? > Serving size is 2 > Misleading advertising and labeling > VitaCraves (craving vitamins??) > Not regulated by FDA until someone dies > 5 year olds considered m...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 23  pages

  • October 16, 2024
  • 23
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • LEB 320F
  • LEB 320F
avatar-seller
Case Studies LEB 320F Final Exam
Questions with Complete Solutions
*One A Day Multivitamin Gummies* - Answer-> Vitamins are supposed to be good for
you, but are these good for you?
> Serving size is 2
> Misleading advertising and labeling
> VitaCraves (craving vitamins??)
> Not regulated by FDA until someone dies
> 5 year olds considered men on the bottle

*Johnson and Johnson Talc Powder* - Answer-> U.S. talc power trial -- ovarian cancer
> The ingredient in the powder "Talc" made from magnesium, silicon, hydrogen, and
oxygen, is the main cause of cancer.
> Started a series of other lawsuits against J&J
> Key: Punitive Damages (paid way more than what they were sued for)
> Gary M. Reedy, CEO of American Cancer Society; former Head of Global Policy for
J&J

*Tax Shelter* - Answer-> When companies move around money to pay less taxes
> Law firm was paid $50,000 per opinion for opinions on tax shelters
> This was illegal because they were giving fraudulent opinions (telling clients to do
illegal things so the firm can make more money)
> Even lawyers can be responsible for illegal & unethical acts

*Starbucks (May 2016)* - Answer-> Sued for too much ice in drinks
> False advertising
> Transparent (very small problem)
*in both Starbucks and Hostess cases, the maximum economic loss was only $5 which
is impractical

*Hostess (June 2016)* - Answer-> Recalled due to undeclared peanut residue
> Bigger problem b/c life threatening, if someone can die it is unethical
> Lack of transparency, self awareness
*in both Starbucks and Hostess cases, the maximum economic loss was only $5 which
is impractical

*TOMS shoes* - Answer-> Marketed as a good, giving shoes to people in third world
countries
> By donating shoes to different regions, they're taking away from jobs from shoe
makers in those areas

*Formula One* - Answer-> Change from using Grid Girls to Grid Kids
> Socially motivated decision, no legal action

,> F1 wants to change its image (less on sexualizing women)
> Not all Grid Girls liked the decision; some enjoyed the job
> Is it ok for the company to make that assumption for them?

*La Croix* - Answer-> What's in La Croix (flavor = natural flavor)
> "framing game"
> FDA doesn't define the term natural
> Are they obligated to tell us?
> The importance of definitions of words in product descriptions
> Violates moral minimum

*Aetna* - Answer-> Health care provider under investigation after company's medical
director said he had never personally reviewed a patient's medical records when making
decisions about what health care the health care insurer would cover
> Economic incentive to protect themselves
> People will eventually give up; don't want to deal with insurance company anymore

*Outback Steakhouse* - Answer-> Woman fired from restaurant chain after complaining
on social media that a big takeout party (church) didn't leave a tip
> The bill was a $735 take out order
> Outback has a strict policy forbidding workers from posting about customers on social
media.
> Outback reimbursed the church for its order in apologetic fashion
> Should the worker have been fired? (Class discussion)

*Volkswagen* - Answer-> Cheated the system and made a bug that said their diesel
cars are more fuel efficient and meet the emission standards when they actually do not.
> Such a big deal that the German Government came out and gave a public apology.
> Parent company of Mercedes Benz might be guilty in taking part in messing with their
cars as Volkswagen did

*J.M. Smucker Company* - Answer-> An activist started to test dog/cat food because
they were getting complaints
> Low doses of pentobarbital (sole use is to put animals to sleep) were found in the food
> Smucker's is a food conglomerate that owns many food brands such as Jiff Peanut
Butter, Dunkin Donuts, etc.
> If they are this careless with dog/cat food, who knows what they'll do with human food

*Snapchat* - Answer-> People are unsatisfied with Snapchat's new update (too similar
to Instagram)
> They keep losing money
> Kylie Jenner's tweet expressed the same sentiment many people feel → tip of the
iceberg (conformity bias)
> Losing $1 billion is the first step on a slippery sloped to making unethical choices

*General Electric* - Answer-> Lost 40% of stock's value in 2017

, > The SEC is investigating the company and its accounting after $6 billion dollars in
insurance loss
> Many of their chief officers, as well as their board of directors, are either stepping
down or being let go of → plants a seed of doubt about the future of the company
> Is fraud involved regarding this Forbes 500 company?

*Roku and NRA* - Answer-> Roku refuses to drop NRA TV
> A lot of companies make their decisions regarding their relationship with the NRA
based on what their competitors would do
> In situations like this, this is not how it should be

*Valeant Pharmaceuticals* - Answer-> Big pharmaceutical company would buy small
pharmaceutical company and jack up the prices
> People had no choice; either pay the price or die
> Valeant gets a lot of $$
> But their stock plummeted
> Business model is to take advantage of sick ppl
> However this is not illegal

*Net Neutrality* - Answer-> Washington State has passed legislation regarding
regulation of internet access for its residents → all resident of Washington have equal
access
> In December, the FCC allowed AT&T and Time Warner to regulate the traffic on their
servers regarding what their customers can access
> No longer equal free access to the internet (definition of net neutrality)
> similar to recreational marijuana laws within states
> example of why we need case law

*Equifax* - Answer-> Data breach because they failed to protect the data and then
prevented consumers from suing the company through a "accept terms agreement" in
order to see if they were one of the individuals whose information was stolen.
> Then said they had to pay $100 to fix the problem that Equifax caused through locking
their credit report.

*Enron* - Answer-> "Black box" company, but people were happy not asking questions
as long as Enron was making them money.
> Everyone else thought they were unstoppable so they thought so too
> Reported finances on basis of "mark-to-market" accounting (based securities on
current market value rather than book value--essentially predictions) which drove stock
prices up
> Executives sold stock before people caught on

*Uber* - Answer-> CEO mocked MIT research on ride-sharing economics
> Flaw in thought process on CEO's part
> Demonstrates a lack of emotional intelligence

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lectknancy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$26.88. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


CA$26.88
  • (0)
  Add to cart