100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
SOCIOL 173 Class Notes - Weeks 6-10 Final Exam Prep (Fall 2024) CA$10.31
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of California - Los Angeles
  4.  
  5. SOCIOL 173 (SOCIOL173)

Class notes

SOCIOL 173 Class Notes - Weeks 6-10 Final Exam Prep (Fall 2024)

3 reviews
 111 views  3 purchases
  • Course
  • SOCIOL 173 (SOCIOL173)
  • Institution
  • University Of California - Los Angeles

This document contains SOCIOL 173 class notes from Weeks 6-10 with Professor Gabriel Rossman at UCLA, specifically designed to help prepare for the final exam. These notes include detailed summaries of lectures and readings, covering key topics like status dynamics, brokerage and network power, Mat...

[Show more]
Last document update: 1 week ago

Preview 6 out of 41  pages

Document information

  • December 5, 2024
  • December 5, 2024
  • 41
  • 2024/2025
  • Class notes
  • Gabriel rossman
  • All classes

Subjects

  • sociology 173 ucla
  • soc 173 final review
  • sociol 173 fi
  • sociol 173 final exam prep
  • sociology 173 professor rossman
  • sociology 173 gabriel rossman
  • ucla sociology final notes
  • sociology 173 weeks 6 10 notes

Written for

  • University Of California - Los Angeles
  • SOCIOL 173 (SOCIOL173)

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: abarcayaritsa • 5 days ago

review-writer-avatar

By: marissacobar • 2 days ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jadewilliey • 1 week ago

Seller

avatar-seller
grantgeyerhahn

Reviews received

Content preview

Weeks 6-10: Post-Midterm Notes –
Preparing for the Final Exam

Week 6 Reading Notes

Reading 1: The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology - Chapter on Status
Dynamics

This chapter explores how status functions as a social signal, covering four main ideas:

1. Status as a Signal of Quality: High-status individuals are perceived to have higher
quality, particularly when direct measures of quality are unclear. For instance, at a formal
event, guests are more likely to value insights from a prominent figure than from a
lesser-known individual. This reliance on status cues helps people navigate uncertain
social situations by assuming high-status equates to quality.
2. Rewards and the Matthew Effect: The "Matthew Effect" explains how initial status
advantages compound over time, giving high-status people or institutions greater rewards
and recognition for similar contributions. For example, in academia, a scientist at a
prestigious university is more likely to receive accolades and resources than a peer with
the same research at a lesser-known institution. This snowball effect reinforces the gap in
status and rewards.
3. Exchange Relations and Status Fluidity: Status changes based on social interactions.
Associations can either elevate or reduce perceived status, depending on the relative
statuses involved. For example, in the story of plantation owner Gaines, his daughter’s
interaction with their servant, Margaret, reduces both of their statuses among the local
elite, showing how association affects standing within social networks.
4. Structural Cues and Value Depreciation: Status-based rankings can lead people to
undervalue lower-status individuals or items, regardless of their actual quality. For
example, investors might prefer a well-known firm over a new startup, even if the
startup’s product is objectively better. Here, structural cues like brand or institutional ties
overshadow quality and lead to biased perceptions.

,The chapter emphasizes that status and quality are intertwined. Those in higher-status positions
often find it easier to display or be perceived as high-quality, creating a cycle where status
continually reinforces itself.



Reading 2: The Stickiness of Category Labels: Audience Perception in Creative
Markets

This study on categorical "stickiness" shows how audiences resist accepting changes in a
creator's category, particularly when they have a strong association with a specific genre or style:

1. Challenges of Repositioning: Creative professionals, like authors, often face challenges
when shifting into new genres, as audiences may doubt their competence in unfamiliar
areas. For instance, an author known for romance novels may struggle to be taken
seriously if they try to write thrillers, as audiences may see this as a departure from their
expertise.
2. Categorical Stickiness and Audience Resistance: Audiences with strong prior
associations are particularly resistant to change, often clinging to established perceptions.
This creates a “label mismatch” where the audience’s expectation does not align with the
creator’s new direction. For example, Stephen King’s attempt to shift from horror to
drama with The Green Mile met with resistance, as many readers expected horror themes.
3. Evidence from Goodreads: Using data from Goodreads, the study finds that long-time
readers of an author resist re-categorizing the author’s new works. For instance, readers
familiar with mystery author James Patterson might tag his venture into romance as
“mystery,” leading to fewer ratings and limited appeal for the new genre.
4. Implications of Categorical Stickiness: This “stickiness” limits a creator’s ability to
diversify. Repositioning can lead to decreased attention and appeal, as audiences may
reject new work that doesn’t fit the creator’s established category. This creates a dilemma
for authors wanting to explore new genres, as it can lead to lower ratings and a smaller
audience base.

This research contributes to understanding how deeply embedded audience perceptions can
shape and often limit creative expression across categories.




Week 6: Status, Networks, and Power in Social
Structures

,Structural Power and Dependence
Key Concepts

● Power and Exploitation:
○ Individuals with structural power tend to exploit others, leading to distrust.
○ Experimental findings:
■ Central players (those in power) earn more but are disliked by both
peripheral players and others.
■ Peripheral players often dislike each other due to competition and
undercutting in negotiations.
● Bonacich (1987) and Network Power:
○ Dependency and Power:
■ Dependence-Based Power: Power arises from relationships where others
lack alternatives.
■ Status-Based Power: Power is granted through connections with
high-status individuals.
○ Bonacich Centrality:
■ Combines eigenvector centrality to measure influence:
■ Positive eigenvector centrality: Reflects status-based power.
■ Negative eigenvector centrality: Reflects dependence-based power.




Brokerage and Its Forms
Introduction to Brokerage

● Definition:
○ Brokers connect two parties who otherwise cannot or do not connect themselves.
● Broker Power:
○ Brokers hold power by influencing transactions and relationships as
intermediaries.

Forms of Brokerage (Stovel and Shaw, 2012)

● Liaison Brokerage:
○ Temporary and transaction-specific connections, such as hiring a contractor.

, ● Itinerant Brokerage:
○ Establishes lasting relationships, such as a matchmaking service.
● Coordinator Brokerage:
○ Manages ongoing interactions to save time and resources for both parties.

Examples and Implications

● Gatekeeper Roles:
○ Control access to opportunities or resources (e.g., administrative assistants).
● Representative Roles:
○ Act on behalf of individuals to create opportunities or manage transactions (e.g.,
agents or lawyers).




Case Studies of Brokerage in History
Betweenness Centrality in Political and Economic Contexts

● Medici Family in Florence:
○ Positioned between rival factions, the Medicis used brokerage to gain political
influence.
● First Century BCE Rome:
○ Brokers like Caesar and Pompey connected political factions, solidifying their
power.
● Measurement: Betweenness Centrality:
○ Reflects a node's importance in connecting different parts of a network.
○ Removing these nodes creates structural gaps.

Application of Betweenness Centrality

● Historical and Modern Networks:
○ Highlights critical brokers' roles in facilitating or obstructing communication.




Challenges and Distrust in Brokerage
Economic and Political Distrust

● Skepticism Toward Middlemen:

, ○ Brokers in economics are often resented for charging fees without perceived
added value (e.g., real estate agents).
○ Brokers facilitate transactions in rare markets but face distrust for “taking a cut.”
● Political Distrust:
○ Political brokers (e.g., party leaders) face backlash for compromises or alliances.
○ Example: Republican Party history shows skepticism toward leaders negotiating
with opposition.

Summary Comparison: Dependence vs. Brokerage Power

● Dependence Power:
○ Arises from controlling alternatives; peripheral players may dislike each other
more than the central figure.
● Brokerage Power:
○ Involves connecting two parties; brokers may be resented for fees or perceived
lack of direct involvement.




Networked Information and Status
Key Concepts

● Networks as Indicators of Status:
○ Social networks reveal status through associations.
○ Example: Affiliation with high-status individuals enhances perceived prestige.
● Status Through Association:
○ Affiliation with high-status figures (e.g., advisors, academics) boosts one’s own
status.




Deference and Dominance Across Species
Observing Status Hierarchies

● Animal Behavior:
○ Deferential actions (e.g., grooming, mounting) signal status hierarchies.
● Human Behavior:
○ Cultural rituals such as bowing or kneeling symbolize submission to higher-status
individuals.

, ● Dyadic Interactions:
○ Local hierarchies are revealed through patterns of deference.

Degrees of Status and Centrality Measures

● Pecking Orders:
○ Degree centrality reflects the number of deferential connections but doesn’t fully
capture status.
● High-Rank Connections:
○ Deference from higher-status individuals indicates higher perceived importance.




Hierarchy and Status in Social Contexts
Patronage and Multi-Level Dominance

● High-Level Patronage:
○ Dominance often extends beyond direct influence, with subordinates dominating
others on their behalf.
○ Examples: Mafia ("boss of bosses") or royalty ("king of kings").
● Status Premium:
○ High status provides tangible benefits, such as the ability to charge more for
services.

Status in Popular Media

● Visual Media and Credits:
○ Contract negotiations determine the order of actors’ names, reflecting status.
○ Example: Higher billing for George Clooney over John Turturro highlights greater
star power.
● Alpha Centrality:
○ Measures status in networks based on connectedness and influence, similar to
PageRank.




Reciprocity and Status Differentials
Gould’s Model of Partial Reciprocity

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller grantgeyerhahn. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$10.31. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

57413 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$10.31  3x  sold
  • (3)
Add to cart
Added