Summary

Summary of History and Theory of Psychology- PSY731 (Chapters 1, 3-10, 13, 15)

2 views 0 purchase

Course
PSY731 (PSY731)

Institution
Ryerson University (Ru )

This document contains a comprehensive set of detailed notes taken from the textbook for PSY 731 (History and Theory of Psychology (Chapters 1, 3-10, 13, 15). The notes summarize key concepts, theories, and findings discussed in the chapters required for the course, providing a structured and acces...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 51 pages

View example

Uploaded on December 23, 2024
Number of pages 51
Written in 2014/2015
Type Summary

CA$13.66

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Chapter 1
September-07-14 12:28 PM

• INTRODUCTION
o Studying the History of Psychology
▪ Historiography: the study of the history of history
• Historiographers examine the variety of ways in which historians have written
history
• Most influential modern history of psychology was written by Edwin G. Boring,
about primarily the growth of the scientific, experimental side of psychology
since the 19th century
• Believed we had to place each development in historical context to fully
understand, finding it necessary to begin his history before the 19th century
▪ Person or Zeitgeist?
• Boring recognized two approaches to history
o One approach emphasized the role of the creative individual in
moving history along
▪ The history of psychology is primarily the stories of those
outstanding people who have contributed to it and changed it
o Second approach; understand each persons work I relation to the
cultural context within which it takes place
▪ This cultural context is called the zeitgeist, or ‘spirit of the
times,’ a concept that Boring attributed to Wolfgang von
Goethe
▪ Give credit to the person where it is due, as well as the role of
the Zeitgeist
• In other words, would someone else have produced the
idea anyway, given the way ideas were developing in
the 19th century
• In addition to Boring’s person-Zeitgeist distinction,
other constructs have been used to represent historical
processes…
▪ Ixion’s Wheel or Jacob’s Ladder?
• Frank Manuel called one construct the progressive versus the cyclical: ‘on one
hand the historical world seen as movement either to a fixed end, or to an
indefinite end that defines itself in the course of the progression, history as
novelty creating and always variant; on the other hand circularity, eternal
recurrence, return to the beginning of things, sheer reintegration or similar
recapitulation
• Suggested Ixion and Jacob be taken as personifications of this polarity
o Ixion was a figure in Greek mythology who was condemned to
rotate forever on a wheel of fire
o In the bible, Jacob dreamed that there was a ladder set up on earth
and the top of it reached to heaven
o Question is, whether history is like Ixion, tied to a revolving wheel,
or like Jacob, dreaming of the ladder that reaches up to the heavens
• Psychology is cyclical
o An idea may go out of fashion for a while, be forgotten, and come
back again as a “new” idea
o Debates now are hardly an original observation

History and Theory of Psychology Page 1

, o Debates now are hardly an original observation
o Possible psychology both progresses and is cyclical
▪ Ideas may keep getting rediscovered but at the same time
those ideas may be understood in progressively more
sophisticated ways
▪ A spiral may be a useful symbol of such a process in which
ideas recur, but at higher and higher levels
• Ideas will be considered again and again by people in
the present
• Accumulation of examples becomes an advantage
▪ The New History of Psychology
• Laurel Furomoto came up with the new history of psychology: emphasizing the
notion that scientists often operate in a subjective fashion, under the influence
of a variety of extra-scientific factors
o Rejected view of scientific activity as a continuous progression from
error to truth, and thus depicts scientific change as a shift from one
world view to another- world views that are linked to theoretical
commitments involving ethical and metaphysical considerations
o The New History of Science
▪ Towards the end of the 20th century, research methods were thought to emphasize
the research process; facts may not ‘speak for themselves’
▪ Pedhazur believed different theories could all be consistent with the same data
• No guarantee of the validity of a theory
▪ The process of scientific inquiry contains a subjective aspect
• Most influential was Thomas Kuhn; concluded that the development of these
disciples had not been smooth
o Scientific disciplines appeared to develop discontinuously- during
long periods almost all workers in the same discipline believed the
same beliefs about methods, data, theory, etc
o A paradigm is a set of fundamental beliefs that guide workers in a
scientific discipline
▪ New paradigms emerged and an old one would be
overthrown; including Darwin’s theory
▪ Kuhn argued that paradigms shape the scientists view of the
world
▪ Can be paradigm clashes in which different ways of
interpreting the data exist; we may see different patterns in
the same situation- each “theory” is equally consistent with
the data, however how we interpret the data may determine
how the data is seen
o Altogether, each theory attempts to explain a different range of
data, but no single theory explains all the data
o Some theories don’t overlap at all, meaning that what one theory
explains is not regarded as data by the other theory and vice versa
▪ Ex. Introspection
o Kuhn believes that the establishment of a single paradigm means
that a discipline becomes a normal science in which the workers
share a view of what constitutes the proper problems and methods
to their discipline
▪ Certain data may be regarded as illegitimate
o Feminism and the Psychology of Women
▪ Feminism is not a single point of view but has many different aspects
▪ Feminism has identified ‘distortions and biases’ in psychology

History and Theory of Psychology Page 2

, ▪ Feminism has identified ‘distortions and biases’ in psychology
▪ One figure in this domain is Naomi Weisstein, founder of Chicago Women’s Liberation
Movement
▪ Another figure was Bernstein and Russo, whom argued that ‘male bias pervades the
very essence of the profession of psychology’; contribution of women wasn’t being
acknowledged and to study the women of psychology and the psychology of women
• Furomoto called this ‘compensatory history,’ contributions of women that have
been neglected by historians
• Furomoto noted that the extension of this research is the ‘reconstructions of
women’s experiences’
▪ Kimball observed that feminist psychologists have worked within 2 traditions
• 1) one emphasizing the similarities between genders
• 2) second emphasizing the positive human characteristics that have been
undervalued because of the association with women
▪ Evelyn Fox Keller influenced the history of science and psychology; suggesting men
confused their own point of view with the absolute truth
• Believed that traditional accounts of science tended to ignore the role played by
factors such as intuition, empathy, personal engagement; characteristics
attributed to women
o Gender and science are socially constructed; so are masculine and
feminise
• She argued we need to become aware of the science-gender system by which
our conception of gender and our conception of science mutually determine
one another
o Psychology as a Social Construction
▪ The paradigm concept and feminism both imply psychology doesn’t involve
accumulation of knowledge, but is also driven by social processes
▪ Social Constructionism: people are predestined to construct and to inhabit a world
with others
• This world becomes a dominant and definite reality
• Limits are set by nature
• Once constructed, acts back upon nature
• People produce reality and therefore produce themselves
▪ A dialectical process is one which opposing tendencies shape one another
• Opposing tendencies of interest to social constructionists are ‘exogenic’ and
‘endogenic’
• Exogenic means coming from outside; stressing importance of factors external
to a person as determinants of human experience (ex. British empiricism)
• Endogenic means coming from inside; humans harbour inherent tendencies to
think, categorize, or process information
• Limitations to both the above, therefore, try to see knowledge as something
people do together, not something people possess; assume psychological
concepts are outcomes of social processes
▪ Psychological Research as a Social Construction
• Suggests that psychological research is not “objective”
• Most believe it is a social construction to some extent
• Morawski and Steele point out the importance of the social context in
understanding how experiences are done
o Negotiations about what is being observed
o What counts as an observation
• Others suggest that scientific research could both be a social construction and
still be ‘true’ in some objective sense

History and Theory of Psychology Page 3

, still be ‘true’ in some objective sense
o Many theoretical concepts and models meanings are not defined
• Kurt Danziger concluded there is no such thing as a private science
o Suggests it’s a collective access, and the objects to which the
practices of the science are directed cannot be other than social
objects constructed through the interaction of real individuals
o Reconciling the ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Histories of Psychology
▪ Older histories have been guilty of presentism, which is the tendency to evaluate the
past primarily in terms of its relevance for the present
• Brought to attention by George W. Stocking
• Practitioners of the older style of the history of psychology have been criticised
for being presentist because they may have failed to understand earlier work in
its own terms
• Stocking contrasted presentism with historicism, which he called the
understanding of the past for its own sake
o Doesn’t have to be a passeist, a person who values the past more
then the present

History and Theory of Psychology Page 4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rjwest80. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$13.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52355 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling