100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Eindopdracht Meten en Diagnostiek 1 Jaar 1.4 Psychologie CA$8.26   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  4.  
  5. Meten en Diagnostiek 1 (P_BMETDIA_1)

Essay

Eindopdracht Meten en Diagnostiek 1 Jaar 1.4 Psychologie
 135 views  4 purchases
  • Course
  • Meten en Diagnostiek 1 (P_BMETDIA_1)
  • Institution
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)

Dit is de eindopdracht voor het vak Meten en Diagnostiek 1 van het eerste jaar psychologie. De eindopdracht is een onderzoeksraport. Het onderzoeksraport is geschreven aan de hand van de APA-richtlijnen. Voor deze opdracht heb ik een 8,8 gekregen. Achterin het bestand staan de ingevulde rubrics, zo...

[Show more]
Last document update: 4 year ago

Preview 2 out of 16  pages

Document information

  • April 23, 2020
  • August 16, 2020
  • 16
  • 2019/2020
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • error

Written for

  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU)
  • Psychologie
  • Meten en Diagnostiek 1 (P_BMETDIA_1)
All documents for this subject (44)

Seller

avatar-seller
mandyrose

Reviews received

Content preview

Running head: THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE SDQ 1




The Reliability and Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

Mandy Roosendaal, 2663488

Psychology, Measurement Theory and Assessment 1

Vedika Lal, group 5

Word count: 2935

25-03-2020

, THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE SDQ 2


The Reliability and Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
According to Kivumbi et al. (2019), 6% of school-going children show symptoms of
oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), 2% show symptoms of conduct disorder (CD), and 2.67%
show symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD). To provide these children
with the best treatment, they must first be tested to see if they have such a disorder. According to
Gregory (2012), only a reliable and valid test is a good test. His definition of reliability is the
consistency of the results of a test. His definition of validity is that a test measures what it aims
to measure. One such test is the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
According to Stone, Otten, Engels, Vermulst, and Janssens (2010), the SDQ is a paper-
based questionnaire for children between the age of 3 and 16 that can help make individual
clinical decisions. The questionnaire consists of 25 items divided over five subscales: emotional
symptoms (5 items, e.g. “many worries, often seems worried”), hyperactivity (5 items, e.g.
“constantly fidgeting or squirming”), conduct problems (5 items, e.g. “often lies or cheats”), peer
relationship problems (5 items, e.g. “has at least one good friend”), and prosocial behaviour (5
items, e.g. “kind to younger children”). The total problem scale consists of the first four
subscales. The response options for all items are “not true” (0), “a bit true” (1), and “certainly
true” (2). The minimum score on the SDQ is 0 and the maximum score is 50. The minimum and
maximum scores for each subscale are 0 and 10 respectively. On all the subscales within the total
problem scale, the minimum score indicates no problems and the maximum score indicates
major problems. On the prosocial behaviour subscale, the minimum score indicates major
problems and the maximum score indicates no problems. Stone et al. (2010) found an internal
consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) of .80 for the total problem scale and an internal consistency
of .67 for the prosocial subscale. According to COTAN guidelines (table 1), an internal
consistency of .80 is sufficient, but an internal consistency of .67 is not.
This study uses the total problem scale, hyperactivity subscale, and prosocial behaviour
subscale to assess the reliability, and the hyperactivity subscale to assess the validity of the SDQ
in a Dutch sample. Cronbach’s alpha is used to determine the reliability of these scales which,
according to Cronbach (1951), is a measure of internal consistency. Three types of validity are
used. The first is convergent validity which, according to Carlson and Herdman (2010), is
determined by a high correlation between the measure being tested and a measure that is
supposed to measure the same construct and therefore indicates whether it measures what it aims

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mandyrose. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$8.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

66579 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$8.26  4x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart