Class notes
Methods in Psychological Research Unit 06
- Course
- PSYB70
- Institution
- University Of Toronto (U Of T )
Unit 06 lecture notes and practice questions
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Understanding Experiments➔ internal validityis the extent to which a causalrelationship existing between two or more
variables can be assumed
◆ IV changes the DV
➔ conditions of causality
◆ covariance: as one variable changes, so does the other
◆ temporal precedence: establish direction of causality
◆ independent variables: IV causes the DV to change(direction matters)
➔ threats to internal validity
◆ selection effects: when groups differ from one anotherin more ways than just the
treatment/IV of interest
◆ confound: a third variable systemically changes theIV/DV, leading to alternative
explanation for the results
◆ false experiment: design that seems like an experimentbut lacks defining features,
making it ultimately correlational
● one-group posttest only design
○ treatment or intervention is implemented within a group of participants
and the DV is measured after the treatment, no control/comparison
group
○ results are confounded because too many factors that could cause the
outcome, other than the treatment
● one group pretest-posttest only design
○ DV is measured before and after implementation of a treatment within a
single group of participants but no separate control/comparison group
○ confounded results because too many factors that could change between
administration of treatment/control and the two outcome measures
● non-equivalent comparison groups
○ group of participants that receive treatment are compared to group that
didn’t receive treatment, but the groups were not randomly assigned to
the conditions
○ confounded results because the groups themselves could differ in
various ways other than the IV
◆ history threat: other events may have happened betweenpretest and posttest that
would explain the outcome
◆ maturation threat: participant themselves may havechanged between pretest posttest
◆ testing threat: participant improves due to priorexposure during pretest
◆ instrumentation threat: outcome measure might changebetween pretest posttest
➔ to avoid these threats to internal validity, useexperimentaldesignswhich meets all 3
conditions
◆ covariance- manipulating conditions of IV allow forclearer comparison of outcomes
, ◆ temporal precedence- directionality of effect is established by manipulating the IV
before measuring the DV
◆ rule out alternative explanations- control for alternativeexplanations
● random assignment
● holding other factors constant
➔ treatment vs control conditions
◆ treatment condition: intervention meant to changepeople’s behaviours
● compared to the control condition
◆ no-treatment control condition: no treatment or interventionat all
◆ placebo control condition: simulated “treatment” thatlacks active elements of the IV
● participants think they’re getting a treatment
◆ treatment control condition: control condition receivesthe standard treatment or an
alternative treatment
➔ ‘active’ control conditions
◆ placebo effect- participants get better based onthe expectation of receiving the
treatment and it being effective
◆ reactivity- participants change b/c aware of beingwatched
◆ demand characteristics- participants may pick upon subtle cues of how they “should”
respond
◆ active control conditions- ensure each conditionhas equal expectations of receiving
treatment and receives equal attention from the researchers
➔ researcher bias
◆ observer bias- expectation influence interpretationsof the observations
◆ experimenter expectancy effect- expectations influencebehaviour towards participants
◆ solutionto researcher bias would be to use a double-maskeddesign
● neither the researcher nor the participant are aware of the who is in which
experimental design
➔ methods forrandom assignment
◆ simple random assignment
● random method of assigning participants to conditions, everyone has equal
chance of being in each group
● advantage: control for selection effects and unknown confounds
● disadvantage: can fail if sample sizes are small; could result in uneven sample
sizes across conditions
◆ block randomization
● chunking participants off into the conditions
○ 1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3….
● advantage: ensure equal sample size
● disadvantage: fail if sample size is small; must ensure recurring blocks are
random and unbiased
◆ matched-group design
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sobikaaravi. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for CA$7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
50990 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now