100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
All Psychopathology Question and Answers CA$6.40   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. AQA
  4.  
  5. Psychology A
  6.  
  7. Unit 3 PSYA3 - Topics in Psychology

Answers

All Psychopathology Question and Answers

7 reviews
 3658 views  12 purchases
  • Course
  • Unit 3 PSYA3 - Topics in Psychology
  • Institution
  • AQA
  • Book
  • AQA Psychology for A Level Year 1 & AS - Student Book

This document provides questions and answers to different possible exam questions in the A level AQA Psychology exam for the Psychopathology section of paper one. The questions range from 2 marks questions to the long 16 marks essay questions, all of which an answer is provided! From these 16 mark ...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 19  pages

Document information

  • October 19, 2020
  • 19
  • 2020/2021
  • Answers
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • psychology
  • aqa
  • a level
  • psychopathology
  • sixth form
  • 16 mark essay
  • answers
  • year 12
  • paper 1
  • paper one

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

More summaries for

  • AQA Psychology AS/A Level - Topic 1: Social Influence
  • Memory summary notes, aqa a level psychology
  • AQA A-Level Psychology | A* Student Notes | Social Influence
All for this textbook (173)

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • AQA
  • Psychology A
  • Unit 3 PSYA3 - Topics in Psychology
All documents for this subject (15)

7  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: lojaina • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: alina3 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: glinton2007 • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: naifajuma • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: palmboonyalug • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: aliosmond • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: liahdayal • 3 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
myusernameisusername

Reviews received

Content preview

Definitions of abnormality:

1. Explain what is meant by the term statistical deviation as a way to define
abnormality (3 marks)
Statistical deviation​ - occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic, for
example being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population.

2. Explain what is meant by the term deviation from social norms as a way to
define abnormality (3 marks)
Deviation from social norms​ - concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted
standards of behaviour in a community or society.

3. Outline one criticism of statistical deviation (3 marks)
A limitation is that not all unusual characteristics are negative, for example, people who have
an extremely high IQ is considered a positive thing, whereas having a low IQ is abnormal
and can have consequences to mental health. The people with high IQs do not need
treatment, only those with extremely low IQ may need treatment. Also, someone may be
living a happy and fulfilled life and would not benefit from having a label of being abnormal,
for example, someone with a low IQ may not feel any distress and may have a good job and
therefore would not benefit from a label or any treatment. In statistical deviation, there is no
consideration of cultural differences, low internal validity?

4. Explain what is meant by deviations from social norms as a way to define
abnormality (4 marks)
People define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is
acceptable or the norm. We are making a collective judgement as a society about what is
right. These social norms are different for each generation and every culture, so there are
relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that
they breach social norms. A person with antisocial personality disorder is impulsive,
aggressive and irresponsible. One important symptom of antisocial personality disorder is an
“absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or
culturally normative ethical behaviour”. We are making the social judgement that a
psychopath is abnormal because they don’t conform to moral standards. Psychopathic
Behaviour would be considered abnormal in a range of different cultures.

5. Describe and evaluate two ways of defining abnormality (16 marks)

One way of defining abnormality is statistical deviation. According to the statistical deviation
any relatively usual behavior or characteristic can be thought of as “normal” and any
behaviour different to this is “abnormal”. The statistical approach can be used to measure
characteristics such as intelligence. The normal distribution for IQ can be used to define
abnormality. The average IQ is 100, most people have an IQ in the range from 85 to 115.
Only 2% of people have a score below 70. These individuals are very unusual and are liable
to receive a diagnosis of a psychological disorder called intellectual disability disorder
(mental retardation).

,One strength the statistical deviation possesses is that it has a real life application in the
diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder, therefore is a useful part of clinical assessment. It
helps us measure IQ and compare with the rest of the population to highlight those with
extremely high or low IQ and identify them as abnormal. Statistical deviation uses a
quantitative measurement to compare. The standardised measurements of IQ is easy for
clinical assessment. Helps give a cut off point in terms of diagnosis, making it easier to
diagnose those with mental disorders/those who are abnormal. Statistical deviation is also
objective due to the mathematical nature, meaning there is no bias

However, a limitation is that not all unusual characteristics are negative, for example, people
who have an extremely high IQ, considered a positive thing, whereas having a low IQ is
abnormal and can have consequences to mental health. The people with high IQs do not
need treatment, only those with extremely low IQ may need treatment.

Also, someone may be living a happy and fulfilled life and would not benefit from having a
label of being abnormal, for example, someone with a low IQ may not feel any distress and
may have a good job and therefore would not benefit from a label or any treatment. In
statistical deviation, there is no consideration of cultural differences, low internal validity.

Another definition of abnormality is deviation from social norms, so groups of people choose
to define behaviour as abnormal on the basis that it offends their sense of what is
acceptable or the norm. We are making a collective judgement as a society about what is
right. These social norms are different for each generation and every culture, so there are
relatively few behaviours that would be considered universally abnormal on the basis that
they breach social norms. A person with antisocial personality disorder is impulsive,
aggressive and irresponsible. One important symptom of antisocial personality disorder is an
“absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or
culturally normative ethical behaviour”. We are making the social judgement that a
psychopath is abnormal because they don’t conform to moral standards. Psychopathic
Behaviour would be considered abnormal in a range of different cultures.

A strength for this definition of abnormality is that it addresses social norms, something that
statistical deviation couldn’t in regards to desirable and undesirable behaviour. It also
considers culture, social norms are specific and not relevant to others so can be made more
specific to a group of people, increasing accuracy.

However, it includes limitations such as cultural relativism, meaning deviation from social
norms can’t be generalised universally. For example, hearing voices is socially acceptable in
some cultures, such as parts in Africa this would be seen as a mental illness in other places
such as the UK/US. African Americans are 7 times more likely to be diagnosed with
schizophrenia than white Americans. This is a limitation because it demonstrates how
diagnoses may be inaccurate.

1. Explain what is meant by failure to function adequately (4 marks)
A person may cross the line between normal and abnormal at the point when they can no
longer cope with the demands of everyday life and fail to function adequately. For example,
by not being able to maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene or if they cannot hold
down a job or maintain relationships with people around them. Rosenhan and Seligman

, have proposed some signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping.
These include: when someone is no longer conforming to standard interpersonal rules
(maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space), when a person experiences
severe personal distress or a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to
themselves or others, an individual must be failing to function adequately before a diagnosis
is made.

2. Outline one strength of the failure to function adequately definition of
abnormality (4 marks)
A strength of failure to function adequately is that it does attempt to include the experience of
the individual and so is personal to them. It may not be an entirely satisfactory approach
because it is difficult to assess stress, but at least this definition acknowledges that the
experience of the individual is important. So failure to function adequately captures the
experience of people who need help. There is a success criteria for recovery, assessing
whether the individual is able to engage in society again depending on the individual's
personal experiences which is hard to measure from other definitions.

3. Explain what is meant by deviation from ideal mental health (4 marks)
Using deviation from ideal mental health is ignoring what makes someone abnormal but
instead think about what makes someone normal. By having a picture of how we should be
psychologically healthy then we begin to identify who deviates from this ideal. Jahoda
suggested that we are in good mental health if we meet the following criteria: we have no
symptoms or distress, we are rational, we self-actualise, can cope with stress, have a
realistic view of the world, good self-esteem and lack guilt, independent of other people and
successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure. Inevitably there is an overlap between what we
might call deviation from ideal mental health and what might be failure to function
adequately.

4. Describe and evaluate at least two definition of abnormality (16 marks)
One method of defining abnormality is failure to function adequately. A person may cross the
line between normal and abnormal at the point when they can no longer cope with the
demands of everyday life and fail to function adequately. For example, by not being able to
maintain basic standards of nutrition and hygiene or if they cannot hold down a job or
maintain relationships with people around them. Rosenhan and Seligman have proposed
some signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping. These include:
when someone is no longer conforming to standard interpersonal rules (maintaining eye
contact and respecting personal space), when a person experiences severe personal
distress or a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others.
For example, intellectual disability disorder, an individual must be failing to function
adequately before a diagnosis is made.

A strength of failure to function adequately is that it does attempt to include the experience of
the individual and so is personal to them. It may not be an entirely satisfactory approach
because it is difficult to assess stress, but at least this definition acknowledges that the
experience of the individual is important. So failure to function adequately captures the
experience of people who need help. There is a success criteria for recovery, assessing
whether the individual is able to engage in society again depending on the individual's
personal experiences which is hard to measure from other definitions.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller myusernameisusername. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$6.40. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$6.40  12x  sold
  • (7)
  Add to cart