100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Criminal Litigation / Criminal Law / Criminal Procedure and Evidence Essay - Rules of Admissibility of Evidence £5.49
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. BPP University College Of Professional Studies Limited (BPP)
  4.  
  5. BPP University College Of Professional Studies Limited
  6.  
  7. Criminal Litigation

Essay

Criminal Litigation / Criminal Law / Criminal Procedure and Evidence Essay - Rules of Admissibility of Evidence
 1 purchase

Essay question: The view that the rules of admissibility patronise the decision makers has led to the suggestion that juries should be presented with all relevant evidence which the prosecution or the defence wish to introduce. Discuss.

Last document update: 3 year ago

Preview 1 out of 12  pages

Document information

  • May 25, 2021
  • May 26, 2021
  • 12
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A

Subjects

Connected book

book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:

Written for

All documents for this subject (9)

Seller

avatar-seller
SupplementaryStudyNotes

Reviews received

Content preview

The view that the rules of admissibility patronise the decision makers
has led to the suggestion that juries should be presented with all
relevant evidence which the prosecution or the defence wish to
introduce. Discuss.


The view that the rules of admissibility patronise the decision makers has led to the
suggestion that juries should be presented with all relevant evidence which the
prosecution or the defence wish to introduce. Effectively, this means any problems or
perceived weakness with the evidence should be explained to the jury, rather than
the evidence being withdrawn from their consideration. In order to examine this
proposition, this essay will consider whether this approach would be a fairer way to
protect and balance the interests of defendants, victims and witnesses during a
Crown Court trial by examining the pros and cons of the rules on the admissibility of
evidence.


Arguably, one of the most controversial areas regarding the rules on the admissibility
of evidence concerns the court’s application of section 78(1) of the Police and
Criminal Evidence Act 19841 which deals with prosecution evidence obtained by
illegal or unfair means. This area is controversial because opinions for and against
the exclusion of relevant evidence have always been strongly divided and there are
strong criticisms as to the ways in which the courts come to a decision on whether
relevant evidence should be excluded or not. As Sanders and Young points out,
“what a judge may regard as ‘unfair’ is something of a lottery”. 2 On the one hand,
there is the view that “evidence which is relevant and otherwise admissible should
not be excluded because of the means by which it was obtained, whether illegal,
improper, or unfair; to exclude it would, in some cases, result in injustice including
the acquittal of the guilty”,3 which seems to suggest that there is a need to seek for
the protection of the victims’ interest. However, on the other hand, there is the
contrasting view that “illegally or improperly obtained evidence should always be
1
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s78(1) states that ‘In any proceedings the court may refuse to allow evidence on which the
prosecution proposes to rely to be given if it appears to the court that, having regard to all the circumstances, including the circumstances in
which the evidence was obtained, the admission of the evidence would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of the proceedings that
the court ought not to admit it.’
2
Sanders, A. and Young, R. Criminal Justice 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) p. 249.
3
Keane, A. The Modern Law of Evidence 7th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008) p. 53.
1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SupplementaryStudyNotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£5.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added