100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary macroeconomics £7.49
Add to cart

Summary

Summary macroeconomics

 0 purchase

Summary of 13 pages for the course Macroeconomic Analysis at School of Oriental and African Studies (Coursework material)

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • June 7, 2021
  • 13
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (9)
avatar-seller
rebeccafaioni
Reading 8 – The natural instability of financial markets – Jan Kregel

About Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis: fragility inherent to successful functioning of
capitalist economies + takes the US financial system = as its reference structure.

- Fragility = result from changes of liquidity preferences of businessmen + bankers for a given
a degree of maturity mismatching.
- Regulations = useful to preventing not fragility per se (which is inevitable for successful
functioning of capitalism) but its propagation to avoid situations like: debt deflations
(occurred in 1930s = Great Depression).

Financial transactions = decisions (like: exchange of money) made today based on expectations
about tomorrow + only if expectations = correct will the future transactions be realized  =
assumption of Rational Expectations.

Keynes  it is the expectation of uncertain future events that determine present decisions to enter
into economic activity SO problem is: HOW to prevent these natural transactions failures due to
uncertainty that would cause chronic instability??? 3 theories on how:

1) Classical theory of economic policy: need of government to provide a regulatory framework to
avoid the chaos that would result from self-interested behavior (Lionel Robbins referring to Smith +
Ricardo)

2) extension of Efficient Market paradigm (adopted by Federal Reserve) to spread risk on those who
can bear it

3) Minsky’s financial instability theory  following Keynes agreed results of transactions = inherently
uncertain + went further also: creation of fragility + instability = endogenous process  economic
stability makes the economy more and more fragile + neither regulations nor complete perfect
market  could ensure financial stability instead = cause of instability!!

Minsky’s hypothesis developed during the “golden years” of New Deal legislation = period of
economic stability  clearly Minsky saw in this stable period an increasing fragility of the economy
and so to him the New Deal did little to avoid instability  clearly financial regulation and fragility
are independent (as shown by this period) BUT financial regulation can play a role in the propagation
of fragility and therefore in causing instability.

Minsky argued: that the risk of fragility breaking down to instability = prevented by

- “Big Government” = acting as lender of last resort for households + businesses
- “Big Bank” = acting as a lender of last resort for financial institutions
 BUT this method of avoiding instability = not available at global level  not possible to
have a:
1. global government = to provide anti-cyclical fiscal policy.
2. global central bank = to act as a lender of last resort

FINANCIAL INSTABILITY AND FINANCIAL FRAGILITY

Financial institutions = intermediators between saver lending funds + borrowers investing the funds

Intermediation requires:

- matching borrowers+ lender

, - matching their concerns about the transformation of the maturity of financial assets from
short-term to long-term
 implicit assumption: lenders prefer short-term liquid assets + borrowers prefer: long-
term, more permanent, fixed interest liabilities  the greater the mismatch = the greater
the risk of insolvency (= greater the mismatch between: maturity of short-term assets issued
to savers + long-term liabilities purchased from investors = greater the risk that an increase
in short-term interest rates relative to long-term rates will produce negative net worth +
insolvency)
 when volatility of short-term interest rates = modest  adjustment consists of: cutting
back on new lending + reducing net margins + drawing down secondary reserves (= method
of monetary control in post-war period)
 when volatility of short-term interest rates = substantial  loans must be called (repaid)
+ forced sales of assets which leads to downward pressure on asset prices.

Financial institutions = characterized not only by (1) intermediary role + (2) maturity transformation
concerns but also (3) produce liquidity issuing short term liabilities against long term assets:

 banks can create liquidity making an illiquid asset more liquid while the bank itself becomes less
liquid  willingness of the bank to create liquidity via lending for (against) a private sector held
asset (= willingness to finance an investment project) = depends on “liquidity preferences” of the
bank  the bank charges a
price for such liquidity creation = “liquidity premium”

 Financial institutions = 2 features:
1. maturity intermediation
2. liquidity creation
= these 2 are linked together  banks lend against real assets by creating demand
deposits

In neoclassical efficient market hypothesis = maturity transformation does not create additional
liquidity

In Minsky = financial fragility not only = possibility of maturity mismatching BUT  inherent to
successful operation of capitalist economies + results from changes in liquidity preferences of
bankers/businessmen = represented as changes (produced by maturity transformation) in the
margins of safety required for liquidity creation (= for lending).

SO: fragility can be present even in a stable economy  due to changes in the extent of creation of
liquidity for a given degree of mismatching

 in this case then: a fall in fall in liquidity preference can take place + while maturity mismatching
remains constant as bankers = more willing to lend against riskier assets.

FRAGILITY IN STABLE CONDITIONS

Minsky’s theory: refers to the US financial system + to the banks of the 1960s (= subject to the Glass-
Stegall Act on restrictions on commercial banking + before the breakdown of the Bretton Woods
system)

Finance for businessman = 2 stage affair: 

- 1. Short term financing of projects comes from the bank.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rebeccafaioni. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£7.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added