100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Key cases for semester 1 £10.49
Add to cart

Judgments

Key cases for semester 1

 0 purchase

Duty, breach, and causation. Psychiatric harm

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • July 4, 2021
  • 3
  • 2019/2020
  • Judgments
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
joycetao
Duty of Care

Smith v Littlewoods-if you are unaware of a risk, you cannot be held liable
Dorset Yacht-it was foreseeable for them to cause damage when they escaped
Donoghue v Stevenson-neighbour is someone that would be closely and directly affected by
behaviour so you must have reasonably thought about them
Robinson v CC for West Yorkshire-positive act of arresting person that caused injury to
person on the street. Potential injury so it would be reasonably foreseeable so they would
be liable
Hill v CC of West Yorkshire-duty of care arises in special circumstances only. Police liable for
injury for their acts and omissions. No duty to apprehend unknown criminal. No duty to
individuals who suffer harm. The only exception to this rule is where the failure to
apprehend the criminal creates an exceptional added risk, different from the general risk
from criminal activity to the public at large, so as to establish a sufficient proximity of
relationship between the police officers and victims of crime.
Osman-followed Hill. Hard to invoke articles
Michael v CC of South Wales-no proximity between the police and the unknown assailant.
Not to protect individual
Caparo-proximity, foreseeability and reasonable
Phelps v Hillingdon-authorities have a duty of care to educate (special needs)
Kent v Griffiths-specific assurance (time-wise. 7-8 minutes) and detrimental reliance
Darnley-must not be purposely misleading which would lead to foreseeable harm
Alexandrou-if there is no contractual relationship, there is no duty

Psychiatric Harm

McLoughlin-blood, mud and oil test/ must be more than mere grief or emotion (ICD11 or
DSM5), time limits
Hambrook-must have seen it, not what was heard
Dulieu-zone of danger, easy to foresee harm
Alcock-secondary victim, unaided senses, sudden assault on nervous system, close ties of
love and affection (parent and child or spouses)
Bourhill-reasonably foreseeable and ordinary fortitude
Reily-natural reaction is not a mental illness
Page v Smith-primary victims do not need to prove psychiatric injury was foreseeable and
thin skull rule
McFarlane-must be or reasonable believe to be in zone of danger
Brice v Brown-as long as psychiatric harm is foreseeable, it is allowed. Even if there is an
existing mental illness
Galli Atkinson-aftermath can be from the time of the accident to after the morgue.
Unbroken chain of events so harm is allowed
White v CC of South Yorkshire-rescuers must have the same process as a secondary victim.
Employer must taken reasonable steps to prevent physical harm if they are not exposed to
harm
Chadwick-volunteers are treated as primary victims, even if there was no fear for children
or own safety, shock foreseeable, must have foreseen rescuers and d must be liable for
damages

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller joycetao. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64257 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£10.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added