Lecture notes
Study notes for EC104: topic 7
- Module
- EC104. World Economy (EC104)
- Institution
- The University Of Warwick (UoW)
Study notes for topic 7: the 2nd IR and rise of the USA. From lectures and seminars
[Show more]
Content preview
The 2nd IR and rise of the USAThe 2nd IR
● Was directed technical change in the 1st and 2nd IRs but the change differs
according to the different resources in different locations
● USA mainly had a trade surplus (1874-1971)
○ Their share of global trade x2 (6% to 11% from 1868-1910)
● Increased steel production (4.3 million tonnes) in 1900s
○ Rails, locomotives, bridges
○ Important export to Russia
○ Produced more steel than Britain and Germany by 1902
● Didn’t just produce consumer goods - output of 20m barrels of oil in 1896
New market organisation (LeFeber 1993)
● MNCs are better at attracting investment and gaining political help, increasing
the market share at home and abroad
○ Thomas Edison’s lab from the 1870s became General Motors
● Policy facilitated the rise of MNCs
○ 1890 Sherman Antitrust Act avoided anti competitive behaviour through
mergers and allowed giants to compete internationally
○ 1979 - adoption of the gold standard which eliminated currency risk
and encouraged trade / investment abroad
● Labour availability furthered the success - workers moved to more efficient
sectors following the fall in the price of wheat during a recession - only the
most efficient firms to survived
○ European migration to the Americas
● Protectionism - 1870 tariff protecting iron and steel producers
○ Producers donated to protectionist politicians
The southern US and the 2nd IR
● Southern USA lost the civil war - in reconstruction from 1865-77
○ Large corporations / capital flows moved south
● Cotton textiles were developed (producing 9m bales in 1891)
○ Prices forced down and cotton was exported to Asia and Latin America
● Tobacco was a major industry and dominated Asian markets by 1912
● Was a good supply of labour but was poor - per capita was ½ of the US
average in 1900
○ The South did not receive European migrants
● South was dependent on the North for capital and on Asia / LA for exports
Britain and the 2nd IR
, ● Late Victorian Britain is the same time period as the 2nd IR (1870-1913) -
when the so-called “failure” occurred
● 1850s-70s: Mid Victorian success, Britain was the workshop of the world
○ Produced ⅓ of manufactured goods
○ Richest country which controlled 40% of trade in manufactured goods
● 1870s-WW2: Late Victorian failure (penalties of an early start)
○ GDP per capita growth rate fell from 1.3% to 0.9%
○ Germany overtook Britain for manufacturing
● Relative failure
Causes of failure
● Overcommitment to the 1st IR
○ Stuck in traditional, low productivity sectors
○ Legacy of inappropriate institutions
○ Locked into a growth pattern with lower productivity sectors with few
potential gains - little substitution of labour for capital
○ Interest group constraints - factory groups limit technological change
because they are benefitting from the current system
○ Is possible for countries to recover after reforms - BR did not due to the
1st mover disadvantage
● Too much capital going abroad
○ High social returns to investment at home but high private returns to
investment abroad - spillovers and externalities
○ ⅓ of British investment went abroad
● Failures in the banking system - inefficient banks
○ Unable to supply LR finance due to “money back on demand” orthodox
○ Concentration and centralisation of smaller banks after the 1858 and
1862 banking acts
● Failures in the banking system - inefficient stock market
○ SMEs priced out as the exchange wanted issues of over £1 million
● Failures in the banking system - new industry bias
○ New industries were risky so capital markets were against them
○ Poor information for new industries
● Education system - education was only made compulsory in 1870
○ Public schools and Oxford uni did not teach science (Germany did)
○ Universities taught a classical curriculum
○ Only 1200 graduated from civic unis (taught science) in 1910
● Industrial organisation - atomistic competition in Britain
○ Low concentration, family firms with poor marketing and a lack of R&D
○ High unionisation and a lack of labour control
○ US and Germany had corporate capitalism with high concentration,
advanced marketing and R&D and social control
Managerialism and Mass production (Chandler, 1977)
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bethwalton03. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
60904 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now