100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Study notes EC104: american reform £2.99   Add to cart

Lecture notes

Study notes EC104: american reform

 2 views  0 purchase

Revision notes with content from lectures and seminars for EC104 topic 15: America reform

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • August 25, 2021
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Lecture notes
  • Claudia rei
  • Topic 15
All documents for this subject (22)
avatar-seller
bethwalton03
American reform: 1979-2001

Inequality in the US

Trends in wage inequality

● Acemoglu and Autor (2011) - wage premium fell in the 1970s but then rose for
3 decades (by about 97% by 2008)
● Real wages have risen for college graduates since 1980 - college wage
premium
○ Have fallen for less-educated workers - especially men
● Increasing polarisation in the US and EU
○ Growth in high-skill, high-wage and low-skill, low-wage jobs
● A&A consider a “canonical” model
○ Skilled and unskilled workers are substitutes
○ Exogenous tech change increases the relative productivity of skilled
workers
○ Can explain real earning declines for some, polarisation, tech change,
offshoring and outsourcing
● A&A propose another model which distinguishes form skills and tasks
○ Tasks can be performed by workers with different skill levels, by
machines or be offshored
○ Routinisation (computers replacing workers in routine tasks) is an
explanation of polarisation (1980-2006)
■ Real cost of performing standardised computations fell by 70% a
year
○ Jobs that are non-routine manual task intensive are harder to replace
○ Wages only rise for high-complexity jobs where computers are
complements, not substitutes

Trends in the top 1%

● Alvaredo et al - % of income received by the top 1% rose from 9-20% (1979-
2011)
○ Also in Australia, Canada and the UK
○ Does not hold in Europe and Japan
● Changes in demand and supply cannot explain this
● Several explanations:
○ Tax - most countries have cut top tax rates (top rate was 60% in 1932
US and <40% in 2011)
○ Pay determination - high earners bargained more as top rates fell
■ ICT, deregulation of finance and globalisation increased demand
for top skilled workers

, ○ Capital income and inheritance - inheritance flows are rising as a % of
national income in France and Germany
○ Wealth concentration - greater in the US (the top 1% owns 35% of
wealth)
○ Distribution of earned and capital income - 61% of individuals in the top
1% of capital income were in the top 20% of earned income (2000)

Welfare reform in the US

Changes in the 1990s

● Blank (2002) - Aid to Families with Dependent Children replaced with
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (1996)
○ Made block grants conditional on >50% of recipient families being in
work or training
○ Imposed a 5 year maximum for TANF fund recipients
● Minimum wage increased from $2.25 to $5.15 (1989-1997)
● Earned income tax credit expanded - subsidised low wage workers
● Increased the real income of a woman with 1 child working full time from
$10,500 to $12,650 (1989-2000)
● Spending on working families rose from $11-66.7 billion (1988-1999)
● Spending on non-working families fell from $24-13 billion
● Global influence - welfare reforms in Canada

Changes after the reform

● Blank (2002) - those claiming welfare fell by 56% (1994-2000)
● FLFP of single mothers with children rose by 10% (1994-1999)
● Women on welfare were more likely to work
● Families in poverty fell from 12-8.6% (1992-2000)
● Poverty among single-mother families fell from 35-25% (1992-2000)
○ Poorest quintile of single mothers had declining incomes
● These changes happened after the policy change
○ Booming economy also contributed
○ Hard to find causal inference

Welfare recipients (1999 and 2009)

● Bitler and Hoynes (2010) compared the profiles of welfare recipients in 1995
and during the Great Recession
● 1995 - 70% single women, 40% non-Hispanic whites, 34% non-Hispanic
blacks. Similar in 2009
● Most families receiving cash welfare combine it with other programmes
○ 1995 - 87% had food stamps and ⅓ were in govt housing

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bethwalton03. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83225 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart