100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
A* A level Politics essay on Conservatism £3.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. A Level Politics
  6.  
  7. Conservatism and Political ideologies

Exam (elaborations)

A* A level Politics essay on Conservatism

1 review
 4 purchases

This is a A* essay on paternalism, in the conservative aspect of the course, under Political philosophy. It comes with real teacher feedback which will aid you to emulate and also write similar essays so you too can get top grades!

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • December 31, 2021
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (1)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: jaenaelynch2005 • 2 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
JiyaImran

Reviews received

Content preview

To what extent do conservatives agree on the importance of paternalism? 24
marks
Teacher Feedback:
Overall: A good and well-argued essay with a well substantiated argument and clear
judgement.
Areas for improvement to get full marks:
 Counterargument could be made stronger with clearer reasons why the
dispute in Neo liberalism cannot be used to justify your argument that
conservatives value paternalism. You could also use more sophisticated
language to further improve the quality of the argument and how it is
delivered.
 More recent examples could also be used (as done with Johnson in 2020) to
further justify your argument and show political awareness, all which pleases
the examiner!
Conservatives agree on the importance of paternalism to a great extent. Traditional and one
nation conservatives fundamentally agree on paternalism and endorse it completely in
society on the basis that it is the moral duty of those with wealth in society to aid those less
fortunate. In addition to this, they would further agree on paternalism because they believe
the elite are the most capable in providing aid to those in financial difficulty. Whilst neo
liberals such as Rand and Nozick would fundamentally oppose paternalism on the basis that
it creates an ‘artificial’ sense of obligation towards others, ultimately this cannot be used to
justify the notion that conservatives do not agree on paternalism in society because the
majority of them do agree. Neo liberalism is also a distinct element of conservatism with
differing views and thus cannot be used to justify that conservatives do not agree on the
importance of conservatism.


Firstly, both traditional and one nation conservatives fundamentally endorse paternalism in
society and its importance. They do so on the basis that those elite in society should have a
moral obligation to do so. For example, Burke maintained that the elite were the ‘natural
aristocracy’ and should morally aid those in financial difficulty. The Cecil family for example
is an example of elite conservative rulers which aided the poor in their hardships. One nation
conservative would completely agree with this notion of aiding the poor on the basis that the
gap between the rich and the poor needs to be mitigated and lessened in order to ensure, as
R.A Butler claimed bring the two nations ‘into one single entity’. Disraeli for example passed
legislation such as the Artisan’s dwelling Act which allowed local elites to buy council homes
in slum areas and provide cleaner ones for work for the working classes. More importantly,
this notion of lessening the gap between the rich and poor can be seen in Boris Johnson’s
policy in 2020 to provide financial assistance to those suffering from the pandemic. Both
conservatives value the importance of aiding the poor and as such agree on the importance
of paternalism.
Furthermore, both one nation and traditional conservatives further agree on the importance
of paternalism as they maintain that the elite are the only suitable individuals to do so.
Cameron called this type of conservatism to be ‘compassionate conservatism and thinkers
such as Oakeshott fundamentally endorse paternalism as it creates a stronger sense of
community. Both conservatives value the importance of a structured and harmonious society
as the only alternative was a ‘war of every man against every man’ as argued by Hobbes in
his canonical work ‘Leviathan’. For this harmonious society, both conservatives agree on the

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller JiyaImran. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64257 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£3.99  4x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added