100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Statutory Interpretation: Rules, Advantages and Disadvantages (Law) £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Statutory Interpretation: Rules, Advantages and Disadvantages (Law)

 32 views  0 purchase

Table separating advantages, disadvantages, and examples of Statutory Interpretation such as the Literal Rule, Golden Rule, Mischief Rule, and Purpose Approach.

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • January 2, 2022
  • 1
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (47)
avatar-seller
serenfarrar
Statutory Interpretation
Advantages Example Disadvantage
- Parliamentary supremacy is maintained - Fisher v Bell (1961) - Can lead to unfair or unjust results/decisions - Be
- - Democratic - Stock v Frank Jones - Absurd results - W
- Maintains the Separation of Powers (1978) - If there are multiple dictionary definitions then (1
- Highlighting problems to Parliament it can’t apply - Lo
- Creates legal certainty - Draftsman do not always do their job perfectly w
Literal Rule Co
an
pe


- Prevents absurd or unjust results - Re Sigsworth (1935) - Can only be used in limited circumstances - M
- Produces a result that Parliament is likely - R v Allen (1872) - No clear definition of what an absurd result is “f
to have intended - Undemocratic as too much power is given to - M
- Respect the authority of Parliament as in judges “a
Golden Rule all other situations, the literal rule is sa
applied



- Prevents absurd or unjust results - McMonagle v - Too much power to unelected judges - RC
- Flexibility Westminster City - It is not the role of the judiciary to update and - Lo
Council (1990) change law to changing times, but Parliaments –
- Mayor v Newport - Out of date ve
Borough Council - Discovering the intention of Parliament is - 40
Mischief Rule (1952) difficult even Hansard
- Lord Denning – “fill in
gaps”


- Favoured by Europe and so helps to - Renton Committee - Allows judges to “fill in gaps” - Vi
comply with our international obligations Repot (1975) - Violating the Separation of Powers (1
- Likely to give effect to the intension of - Coltman v Bibby
Purpose Parliament Tankers (1987)
Approach

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller serenfarrar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67447 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart