100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IB TOK Internal Assessment Essay £6.94
Add to cart

Presentation

IB TOK Internal Assessment Essay

 0 purchase
  • Module
  • Institution

This is an IB TOK Internal Assessment Essay

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • June 21, 2022
  • 6
  • 2020/2021
  • Presentation
  • Unknown
  • Secondary school
  • 5
avatar-seller
Question: Shared knowledge often changes over time. Does this fact undermine our

confidence in current shared knowledge?



As a society, we tend to discover or create new knowledge every day. This

question itself is affirming that shared knowledge does change over time and when

asking if our confidence on current shared knowledge could be challenged, it is

therefore claiming that there are some truths that in the future will be proven wrong.

The main point is that we might believe that something we consider as truth isn’t

truthful at all, but you don’t know when it will be proven wrong, therefore, our

confidence on the claim is at risk. The question also involves personal knowledge as

confidence is particular to every individual, and if shared knowledge changes and

undermines our confidence, then personal knowledge also changes. In the areas of

knowledge of ethics and mathematics, knowledge is a mixture of both shared and

personal knowledge. However, the acquisition of knowledge is different for each area

of knowledge, therefore, the cycle of shared knowledge is also different, as well as

our confidence on it.



Shared knowledge in ethics changes over time but in a cycle where truths in

the past that have been left, are again believed to be truthful. By this I mean that the

cycle in ethics has no progressive sequence, hence why, people’s confidence will be

undermined as it would be uncertain to know what to believe in various situations. A

current example is Brunei changing their 10-year imprisonment law against

homosexuals with the Islamic Sharia law which states that people who commit

homosexual sex or adultery will be stoned to death. This supports my argument as

homosexuals are getting acceptance by different religions and societies, and has

, been morally accepted by people themselves. For instance, Mozambique, a very

Muslim and Christian country that condemned homosexuals, made homosexuality

legal since 2015 and even has a law that bans anti-gay discrimination. Nevertheless,

the Sultan of Brunei, Hassanal Bolkiah, and leftist groups in Brunei are going back to

the time where homosexuality was a sin and believed to be completely unnatural.

This argument is also complemented by the fact that the punishment is stone to

death, which is an archaic execution method in the medieval period and has been

gradually claimed to be immoral. By this method being used again, shows that

knowledge in ethics changes over time, as something considered wrong throughout

many years can be considered truthful again in the future and it doesn’t follow

current morality. Hence why, our confidence will always be undermined but as

confidence is personal to each individual, it depends on each person on changing

their beliefs. In this AOK we could even argue that there is no moral truth at all, or

there are multiple. Descriptive relativism states that there can be moral

disagreements between cultures and individuals but this doesn’t mean that either

argument is right or wrong.



In response, knowledge in ethics does follows current views and beliefs, and

morality highly depends on context and place. A personal example is that my parents

and grandparents are Indians. My parents believe that I should do a love marriage,

whilst by grandparents believe that I should do an arrange marriage because of

moral relativism, which states that “our values are determined by the society we

grow up in, and there are no universal values” (Lagemaat, 2015, pg.477). They say

that in most love marriages, the love between the couple decays, while in an arrange

marriage it grows. My parents themselves had an arranged marriage, they didn’t

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller mahakpunjabi. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.94. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69252 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£6.94
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added