Summary

Summary ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD NOTES AND EXEMPLAR PARAGRAPH STRUCTURES

0 purchase

Module
Ontological Argument from Reason

Institution
OCR

A01 and A02 notes, and evaluative model paragraph structures for the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God topic, following the OCR Religious Studies, Philosophy of Religion Unit. Please reach out if you have any questions about the resource or the content itself. Thanks!

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 10 pages

View example

Uploaded on June 23, 2022
Number of pages 10
Written in 2021/2022
Type Summary

vaneezabtt Member since 3 year 27 documents sold

ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT FROM
REASON
ANSELM’S DEFINITION OF GOD
“God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived” Proslogian 2
ANSELM’S ARGUMENT
 A priori and Deductive
1. BY DEFINITION, God is the best and greatest possible thing I
can imagine
2. It’s better to exist in Mind and Reality than just mind
3. If God is the greatest thing we can think of, the only thing
better is the real thing (Some kind of Super-God)
4. Therefore, God exists.
 Believes existence is a Predicate: The very essence of God includes
existence
 “Only a fool in his heart says there is no God”
 Painter Analogy: The artist who thinks of a beautiful painting in his
head makes it better by actually painting it in real life
 God is NECESSARY as there is no possibility of him not existing and
he needs to exist. Used as response to Gaunilo’s criticism as the
Island is contingent. (Proslogian 3)
EXISTENCE AS A PREDICATE
 Predicate: Defining characteristics that give the subject a meaning
“Socrates is Bald”- Bald is the predicate
 Existence being a predicate means existence is a characteristic of
something
 Analytic if you think the very essence of God is existing by definition
 Synthetic if you believe God may or may not exist
GAUNILO’S RESPONSE
 Used the same line of reasoning as Anselm, but pointed out a fallacy
in reasoning that reduced it to the absurd
 Perfect Island analogy: The Ontological argument can be compared
to a Perfect island I can imagine, because it must exist as it would
be less perfect if it did not. It can be extended to any understood
“perfect thing”
 You cannot infer the existence of something from just the idea of its
being perfect.
 Criticism: An Island has no intrinsic maximum and can Always be
improved, God is necessary and cannot be improved ever.
HUME AND NECESARY BEINGS
 Nothing a priori can solve ideas on whether something exists or not

,  He believed that existence is not a quality (or perfection), so a
completely perfect being need not exist (linked to teleological
argument)
 It is not a contradiction to deny God’s existence NOT a necessary
being.
THOMAS AQUINAS
 Anselm’s argument is incorrect as the finite human mind cannot
understand the abstract nature of God
DESCARTES AND PERFECTION
 Supported the deductive argument
1. God is supremely Perfect
2. Existence itself is Perfection (or existence is a Predicate of a
perfect being)
3. Example: God without existence is like a triangle without three
sides
4. If Existence is Perfection, and God is a Perfection- God
Must Exist
 Triangle example: Existence is God’s essence, in the same way
three sides is to a triangle
KANT’S OBJECTION TO DESCARTES
 Critique of Pure Reason
 “God exists” cannot be an analytic sentence as analytic statements
work with ideas NOT Reality
 All statements about existence must be synthetic
 Therefore, existence is not a real predicate, as “existing” does not
add anything to the description
 Example: 100 thalers in your mind do not have any additional value
than the ones in real life; the concept is the same
SUPPORT FOR KANT
 Frege: There are First and Second Order predicates
1. First order predicates tell us about Nature (the horses are
brown)
2. Second order predicates tell us about Concepts (the horses
are numerous in nature)
3. Therefore, Descartes and Anselm are wrong as they think
existence is First Order not Second
 G.E Moore: Agrees existence cannot be used as a predicate as it has
a different function
1. Some tame tigers do not growl
2. Some tame tigers do not exist
3. The second statement is therefore meaningless

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller vaneezabtt. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.09. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD NOTES AND EXEMPLAR PARAGRAPH STRUCTURES

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview