Charles Taylor - Interpretation and the Sciences of Man
● Two opposing views of the ‘sciences of man’: hermeneutic and empiricist
● Hermeneutic sciences characterised by three things:
○ an object or field of objects about which we can speak of in terms of
coherence or incoherence, sense or nonsense
○ distinction between the sense of coherence made, and its embodiment in
language. ie distinction between phenomena and their expression; ‘a distinction must be
possible between meaning and expression’
○ must have meaning for a subject (e.g. agent)
● Problem with hermeneutics is that it rests on seemingly subjective interpretation
○ an interpretation may make sense of what seems incoherent, but what if
someone reads the language/situation differently?
■ the interpreter can only justify with reference to more
expressions or readings; hence we cannot avoid an ultimate appeal to common
understanding of the expressions/‘language’ involved
■ this is the ‘hermeneutic circle’
● There are two ways that have been employed to break out of the circle
○ rationalism a la Hegel
■ aspires to such clarity that refutation would be
unthinkable
○ empiricism
■ accepts as brute certain facts e.g. sense data, and seeks to
build on these brute facts using inference (logical empiricism)
■ this is the model of the natural sciences, and its hand is
strengthened by the invention of computers (because explicit inference
procedures)
● An empiricist will necessarily be hostile to hermeneutics, because it cannot meet the
requirements of intersubjective, nonarbitrary verification
● Why would we consider the sciences of man to be hermeneutic?
○ when we talk in terms of meaning we refer to three things:
■ meaning is for a subject i.e. context dependent; there is
no meaning in vacuo
■ meaning is of something i.e. there is a distinction
between meaning and its element
● there can be no meaning without
elements, but the same meaning can appropriately attach to different
elements
■ things only have meaning in a field i.e. in relation to the
meanings of other things - colour, numbers etc.
○ this is hermeneutic e.g. shame cannot be explained but with reference to
other concepts, which themselves cannot be explained without reference to shame
■ we may not notice this because we are inside the
hermeneutic circle, but we notice it instantly when exposed to another
civilization
● Do the sciences of man fulfil the three criteria of hermeneutic disciplines?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.