● The covering law model is inept at explaining human behaviour
○ even if behaviour does fall under a law, discovery of the law would not
enable us to understand it in the proper sense
● This is often expressed by the claim that a historian must penetrate, achieve insight,
identify with characters, revive, reenact etc...covering law models would at best grant external
understanding
○ Covering law logicians respond to this by claiming it is a method and
psychological description, but that alone it suggests that ostensible empathy is equivalent
to understanding/explanation
Explaining and Justifying Actions
● When we ask for an explanation of a historical action, often we want a reconstruction of
the agent’s calculation
○ but the agent may not have calculated deductively, or with propositions,
or even deliberately
■ in these cases there may be nothing for the historian to
do, but in any case, an action is purposive insofar as there is a calculation which
could be attributed to it
● There is an element of appraisal when we attempt explanations of social actions; we are
interested in what was seen to be appropriate; whether it was justified or excusable
○ of course, rational means more than the right/proper/intelligent thing to
do - we must investigate value norms/social context/individual psychology/extent of
information available to agent in ascertaining justification
■ the investigator must bring in foreign data to piece
together the calculation
● ‘What the historian declares to have been the agent’s reasons must really be reasons
(from the agent’s point of view).’
The Point of the ‘Identification’ Metaphor
● Hempel sees empathy as a shortcut to quasi-understanding without empirical laws or
generalizations, and that the device doesn’t ‘guarantee the soundness of the historical explanation
to which it leads’ which would depend on ‘the factual correctness of the empirical
generalizations’
○ But the approach may not be just a methodology - it may be that only by
empathising, piecing together in this way can we understand what was done
● The claim that it is a methodological dodge assumes, falsely, that all there is to notice in
these explanations is a second rate method of obtaining the same sort of result as can be obtained
more reliably with empirical covering laws
● There is a suspicion that empathetic historians seek to place explanation beyond the
bounds of empirical enquiry with words like ‘intuition’ ‘projection’ etc
○ this is false - the reconstruction of social norms and context requires
empirical evidence to be supported, but not for application to a general law, but in order
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.