100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary India, c1914-48: The road to Independence Essay Plans £10.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. History 2015
  6.  
  7. Unit 2F.1 - India, c1914-48: the road to independence

Summary

Summary India, c1914-48: The road to Independence Essay Plans

1 review
 3 purchases

This document contains A* level essay plans, drawing on the content within my Complete Indian Independence PDF document for the course; India, c1914-48: The road to Independence. These essay plans provide excellent insight into challenging past essay questions as well as questions I created myself ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

Document information

  • July 20, 2023
  • 8
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (12)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: vijayakhaitan • 9 months ago

Seller

avatar-seller
harrisonshaw

Reviews received

Content preview

India, c1914-48: The road to Independence

June 2022: Section B

‘The impact of the salt satyagraha (1930) was more significant than the impact of any other civil disobedience
campaign in the years 1920-42.’ How far do you agree?
Introduction

• Gandhi embarked 3 main satyagraha campaigns years 1920-42
• If one was to define ‘more significant’ as causing the largest advancement towards independence, accurate sympathise with
statement to large extent; overall salt satyagraha proved most effective + largest impact
• Assess statement greater depth: all 3 civil disobedience campaigns will be examined to justify large extent

Conclusion

• Reiterate large extent concur with statement as caused largest advancement towards independence
• Evaluate the limits of the 1920-21 campaign + ‘Quit India’ 1942

Satyagraha 1920-21 Salt Satyagraha 1930 Quit India 1942
Successes • Intervened local situations: peasant farmers • L. James synopsis: ‘independent India lived off • Gandhi urged every demonstrator become own
Champaran forced by white planters grow its last legacy,’ with Gandhi’s ability combine leaders: horrific riots, killings + destruction gov
indigo disadvantaged terms + Gurjarat where ‘radical + moderate demand’ (M. Ali) buildings/revenue offices (most alarming postal
cotton mill workers earning pittance (Gandhi • French argues ‘its greatest strength was its services/train strikes at time war)
fasted) simplicity’ while ‘challenging heart of imperial • Linlithgow to WC Aug 31st: ‘worst rebellion
• 1919/20 Gandhi forged relationships upcoming rule’ due to the emotive + symbolic nature of since 1857’…’rampant protest’.
regional leaders: Patel, Prasad + young J. Nehru salt (Britain Salt Act 1882) • New leaders such as Aruna Ali emerged out of
(astute political awareness for future struggles) • Gandhi won propaganda battle against British vacuum leadership: hoisted Indian National Flag
• Businessmen hitherto ignored by Congress (pay- within global opinion, ‘a consummate showman’ at the Gavalia Tark Maidan, Bombay 1942
rolled campaign; 10m rupees collected April- (French) with >250 journalists from USA • Madhuban (UP): local policemen barricaded vs
June 1921) documenting the march (attracted 75k 1st day) 4k weaponised villagers + 2 elephants:
• Targeted areas gov Indian non-cooperation • ‘Vital Congress gathered as many discontent defenders fired
unlikely bring conflict with police: 90% qualified under its wings’ (James) + able to ‘re enforce • Affected many aspects both British + Indian
voters UP abandoned 1920 elections; Prince Congress’ self-image as tribune of entire nation’ lifestyles: kept Congress Party united through
Wales visit 1921 shops closed throughout (James): British lost considerable portions challenging times; ‘placed demand
Calcutta Bombay, UP successful land tax + NWF full scale independence immediate agenda nationalist
• Gandhi adjusted philosophical ideologies to rebellion Afridis movement’ (A. Upadhyay)
incorporate different shades of opinion • Gandhi-Irwin Pact: treated equally with Viceroy • Independence ‘no longer matter bargain +
campaign needed (most successful where (de-facto leader Indian nationalism) + clear any became clear after the war’ (Chandra); led to
campaigns linked prior patterns nationalist solution impossible without Gandhi/Congress
independence some regard, instilling new
institution building: Gov Bengal ‘built
confidence among masses + induced spirit
organisation real power’
sacrifice to Congress
• Lucknow + Benares (Gangetic North) 100k
joined peasant associations 1st months 1920 • British understood power masses + potential
threat able propose to Raj; ‘fast running out
space to manoeuvre’ (Spear); painful situation
to continue rule economically, politically, and
socially

Failures • 1921 initial optimism melted away by internal • By 1931, British effectively back in control; • 9th Aug: British arrested 100k first weeks; Nehru
difference/popular apathy proved misplaced physical authority British re- + most Congress party leaders arrested +
(most who quit institutions eventually returned, established/maintained easily when campaign interned; 3k injured
already Indianized + ‘infinitesimal’ according to resumed (1933-34) • 14th Aug RAF began flying against crowds
Viceroy Reading) • Indian army defeated riots Peshawar April 1930 threatening railways UP + Bihar (ordered
• Small dent submission Indian soldiers to (33 killed + 30 injured); end 1930 60k Congress machine gun if didn’t disperse); 35k British
imperial command: ‘even at height of campaign, supporters jailed + 29k still there 1931 troops available support police
enough Indian tax collectors, police officers + • 215k police stayed loyal + demonstrations • WC: ‘I will not preside over liquidation British
magistrates maintain limited but functioning ‘depleted ranks’ (James); Congress ran out of Empire’ (Churchillian conservatism)
control of Raj’ (Brown) + middle classes didn’t steam + quality leadership varied due to de- • 1942 British intelligence expect likelihood
fear administrative collapse centralised nature of satyagraha (unlike 1920- outcome: raid Congress branch offices yielded
• Lala Lajapat criticised movement: students at his 21) more info positioning local disturbances +
Dayananda Anglo Vedic college in Lahore asked • Wisdom of Irwin: to many Indians British undercover agents penetrated most Congress.
join boycott but institution ‘taught order, renew leadership reasonable; Pact clear • Ballia, Uttar Pradesh: outnumbered magistrate
skill + honour’ compromise/willingness consult (Gandhi refuses burnt 400k rupees to stop falling into hands of
• Gandhi’s refusal exclude anyone from his 1st RTC + intransigent 2nd) + chose not to mob
political coalition ‘sowed the seeds of disruption implement martial law (awareness zeitgeist) • Hindu areas such as Bihar, military remained
within his movement’… ‘a charismatic + naïve • Campaign didn’t enter Princely States: Maharaja loyal to raj as ‘ultimate pillar colonial state’
idealist’ (R. Williams) + imperial state ‘obliged of Kashmir forbade all meetings/support for
(Khan)
issue more repressive approach’ (E. Wilson) Congress + Maharaja Hyderabad sent 200k
• Moplah Rebellion: >600 killed + 2.5k forcibly rupees to British pay for action against
converted to Islam, 66 suffocated in train disturbances
wagon; ‘ominous character of communal
violence cast shadow over non-cooperation’
(James) + Chauri Chaura (6th Feb 1922) protest
mob burnt 22 policemen to death (movement
called off + Gandhi arrested on charge sedition
for 6 years 10th March 1922)

, How accurate is it to say that Gandhi’s poor political skills were the principal reason for the failure of the
Second Round Table Conference in 1931?
Introduction

• New Labour gov 1929 committed clear change relationship Britain/India; Dominion/Irwin Declaration 1929 made clear current
British policy build upon Montagu Declaration + move towards eventual granting Dominion Status India.
• If one was to define ‘principal reason’ as the main cause of failure 2nd RTC, accurate sympathise with statement to large extent;
overall Gandhi’s claim represent ‘all India’ alienated other Indian political parties + played into hands of the British
• Assess statement greater depth: Gandhi’s poor political skills, actions of other Indian parties/Jinnah + British
government/situation in Britain will be examined to justify large extent

Conclusion

• Reiterate large extent concur with statement as Gandhi’s poor political skills principal reason failure 2nd RTC
• Evaluate that both other Indian political parties/Jinnah + British intransigence/changing political scene also contributed to
failure; Gandhi’s poor political skills meant foundations conference failed + Gandhi instigated the failure through his actions

Gandhi’s poor political skills Other Indian political parties/Jinnah British government/situation in Britain
• Similar mix delegates: Gandhi attends • All parties demanded separate • Communal question brought
as sole representative Congress electorates: ‘well-chewed bone of deliberately forefront + magnified by
• Gandhi hoped symbolise unity Indian contention’ (James); focused government who didn’t intend part
Nationalist movement (insisted ‘with desirability reserving seats with power
God as my guide’ went as far question racial/religious minorities + how could • Gandhi told MacDonald no meaning
right fellow delegates be present) affect resulting balance power bringing Ambedkar unless create
• All it symbolised was arrogance • Conference began unravel: difficulties (intransigent) - Gandhi
believing able represent such vast + Hindu/Muslim disagreements; argued represented depressed classes
diverse organisation alone + lack Congress worried possible alliance more effectively + expressed similar
judgement maintaining could speak for Princes + Muslims, could outweigh any views
all India recommendations Congress might • Overwhelming no. Indian delegates
• Gandhi states ‘Congress platform make, ‘derailed by bickering over highlighting extent issue at stake,
universal’: naive given permutations electoral power’ (James) loyalists, communalists, careerists,
attendees at Conference (yet no • Collapse talks exposes self-interest landlords (British claimed Congress
separate electorates Muslims/other Indian parties gain own cause + ignore didn’t represent all India)
minorities) united struggle • Situation in Britain: Nov 1930 → Dec
• Iqbal the Aga Khan + Jinnah (alienated • Historical representation Muslims + 1932, British political situation
by Gandhi’s behaviour) attended Sikhs proved intensely unpopular with changed: April 1931 Viceroy Irwin
representing ML; Master Singh (Sikhs) most delegates (demanded separate replaced by Lord Willingdon (rigid
+ Dr Ambedkar (untouchables Gandhi electorates) conservative compared conciliatory
demanded not be treated as • Jinnah’s attitude surprised everyone: likeable persona Irwin)
‘minority’) deceitful in effort gain concessions + • British 1st Labour gov replaced by Tory
• Gandhi aware couldn’t accept anything privately asking MacDonald in dominated coalition: cabinet facing
involving dominion status (sided with bargaining spirit: ‘Hindus prepared Great Depression 1929, unemployment
‘Young Hooligans’/salt satyagraha) give, how much more British prepared + recession (political/financial
• Gandhi vs Jinnah selfishness + give Muslims’ pressure); New Sec of S for India Sir
disagreements all Indians: self-interest • Method bargaining became notorious Samuel Hoare more reservations about
own parties + not united struggle; of talks + demanded stop self-gov
Congress inability recognise (unscrupulous way Jinnah prepared • Churchill: ‘Gandhi naked seditious
opinions/outrage ML bargain for Muslim cause) fakir;’ argued totally unsuited
• Jinnah complicated situation with democracy + remain subordinated, sets
manipulative tactics, ‘playing one up India Defence League in attempt
group of another’ (James) in seeking galvanise support against purna swaraj
gain concessions • Coalition gov altered atmosphere
conferences 1931: sole outcome
session widening divisions Congress +
minorities with ‘antagonistic British
gov’ (James) complete opposite Indian
aspirations
•

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller harrisonshaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64257 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

TEST BANK FOR ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY FOR HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, 5TH EDITION KATHRYN BOOTH, THOMAS O’BRIEN (With Answer Key)
£10.99  3x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added