100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Critically evaluate the claim that infants learn words through domain-general attentional mechanisms. £2.99
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Reading (UoR)
  4.  
  5. Psychology
  6.  
  7. Early Word Learning

Essay

Critically evaluate the claim that infants learn words through domain-general attentional mechanisms.

1 review
 3 purchases

Critically evaluate the claim that infants learn words through domain-general attentional mechanisms.

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

Document information

  • May 21, 2017
  • 3
  • 2015/2016
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • Unknown

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (1)

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: shaunwee • 7 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
Lucyab

Reviews received

Content preview

Critically evaluate the claim that infants learn words through domain-general
attentional mechanisms.

Word production in infants starts at around twelve months and typically begins to develop
slowly. Research has attempted to explore the mechanisms by which infants learn and
interpret words. Many have suggested that children learn words through domain-general
mechanisms. This means that they obtain information through exploring their environment,
and paying attention to the world around them. This way, whole knowledge is internalised
from experience. However, other researchers have proposed that knowledge is actually
obtained through more specialised structures, and children learn language through a more
active mechanism than simply ‘paying attention’.

Smith and Yu (2007) addressed the ‘mapping problem’ (Quine, 1960) and proposed that the
pairing of a word and a scene may not always be enough for an infant to learn the meaning of
a word, particularly after one encounter with the novel word. Quine describes the problem of
mapping meanings onto words by illustrating a scene where a stranger points to a rabbit and
says “gavagai”. He explained that someone who is not familiar with the language would be
unsure as to what the stranger is referring to. For example, he could be describing the rabbit,
or specifically the rabbit’s ears, a tree, or the grass. Although, despite this indeterminacy
problem, it seems that children do manage to determine word meanings from such encounters
(Smith, 2000). This supports the idea that infants learn words through domain-general
attentional mechanisms because this way, words are learned by internalising information
gathered from encounters where meanings are ‘mapped’ onto words. It is suggested that
words are learned in the same way as other domains of knowledge: by just ‘paying attention’.
Following on from this, Smith and Yu explained that the ‘word-scene pairing’ process is not
likely to be the only mechanism through which infants learn words.

Not all scenarios where fast-mapping has been demonstrated are as straight-forward as some
examples have suggested. For instances, everyday encounters where there is the opportunity
for language development, infants will often be exposed to many words, and limited cues as
to what these words refer to. Therefore, Smith and Yu (2007) thought on one hand, it may be
that infants ignore information in settings where word learning is too complicated, and only
pay attention to contexts that are less ambiguous. On the other hand, they proposed that the
learner may gather knowledge from multiple experiences and puts the information together to
interpret and internalise word meaning. Werker et al. (1998) provided evidence that 14-
month-old infants can rapidly learn associations between words and objects in their ‘switch’
design experiment. They found that 8- to 12- month old infants were not able to form the
associations, however they did appear to process both the word and the object information.
Therefore, this research supports the notion that infants learn words through domain-general
attentional mechanisms. In addition, from this research it seems that infants’ learning is
developed in stages according to age.

Piaget (1953) believed that intelligence develops as we adapt to meet the needs of our
environment. He proposed stages of intellectual development and believed that all knowledge

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Lucyab. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64302 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Other ·

(0)

PICOT Question on Drug Addiction final ALL ANSWERS 100% CORRECT FALL-2021 SOLUTION GUARANREED GRADE A+

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

Student-FTT- Rapid Reasoning Nursing Pediatrics (Roseman University Of Health Sciences) Failure To Thrive (FTT)

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

Test Bank - Pharmacotherapeutics for Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers 5th Edition by Teri Moser Woo

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

EXAM III Mental Health Nursing NCLEX Style Q&A/ (100% CORRECT) /Chamberlain College of Nursing/ RATED A

Case ·

(1)

CSM Leiden - Data Collection Report Global Perspectives in Intelligence - Russian Intelligence Community

Essay ·

(5)

Huidtherapie critically appraised topic (CAT) verslag leerjaar 4 EBP in de huidtherapeutische praktijk

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

AA Part 1- Initial Ramp Training study set Exam Questions and Answers 2024/2025( A+ GRADED 100% VERIFIED).

Package deal ·

(0)

NR 508 Bundled Items - Quizzes, Midterm and Final Exam [A Comprehensive Guide to Excel in NR 508 Module]

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

Test Bank - Understanding Medical-Surgical Nursing, 7th Edition (Williams, 2023), Chapter 1-57 | All Chapters
£2.99  3x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added