100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
'There is no need for religious rules about private sexual behaviour between consenting adults' Discuss. £4.49
Add to cart

Essay

'There is no need for religious rules about private sexual behaviour between consenting adults' Discuss.

 0 purchase
  • Module
  • Institution
  • OCR

This 32/40 (A grade) essay on Religious Studies - Ethics - Sexual Ethics provides a great revision and learning resource for Religious Studies Students, covering key content and wider knowledge. Key themes in this essay are: - The Catholic Church - Homosexuality - Pre-marital sex - Divorce ...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • November 2, 2023
  • 3
  • 2023/2024
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
avatar-seller
laramachin
“There is no need for religious rules about private sexual behaviour between consenting adults.” Discuss.

Many changes have occurred in the Western world regarding the attitudes towards sex and legislation that
follows in recent years, with a shift away from applying traditional Christian rules as moral and absolute
standards. This is true especially for homosexuality and pre-marital sex in the Western world, however influence
from religious doctrines on sexual behaviour still exists on a very large scale globally, with homosexuality still
illegal in many countries including Brunei, Iran, Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Nigeria, and more. There may be
no need for religious rules about private sexual behaviour between consenting adults in the modern age as,
although the origins of certain religious propositions have rational contextual justifications, they have not evolved
to accommodate different ideas, views, and circumstances in the 20 th and 21st centuries. We can see below that,
when applied to the concepts of homosexuality and pre-marital sex, religious rules can be seen to be outdated,
and more lenient guidelines such as those of the Church of England may be more acceptable. Whilst religious
rules work successfully with extra-marital sex, it can be argued that this concept does not fall under private sexual
behaviour. Therefore, other methods of ethics may be more acceptable rather than religious rules, such as
Fletcher’s situation ethics.

Religious rules regarding private sexual behaviour between consenting adults can be applied to the concept of
homosexuality, to which are problematic. Religious rules go against the idea of homosexuality, as seen through
isolated Biblical quotes, such as in Leviticus: “Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman,
that is detestable”. This is obviously not applicable in the modern western world, and has often been criticised
due to mistranslations, as the original text was regarding paedophilia as opposed to homosexuality, which
correlates with Greek and Roman customs at the time and therefore makes logical sense. In a society such as the
UK which decriminalised homosexuality in 1967 and legalised gay marriage in 2014, these teachings and their lack
of correlation with laws justifies the view that religious rules hold no place involving in private sexual behaviour
between consenting adults. In addition to this, other passages in Leviticus also forbids unkept hair, tattoos, and
beard trimming, therefore it can be implied that Christians cherry-pick rules in the Bible that they agree with. This
idea is supported by Gareth Moore who claimed that ‘cherry picking’ rules attack minorities and result in religious
rules being used to inconsistently reinforce prejudices. Arguably, religious rules in the Bible only apply to the
context of their time, and this was also raised by John Selby’s open letter on gay marriage to the Archbishop of
Canterbury in 2007, as he claimed that the Bible “supported slavery”, “opposed Darwin”, and “kept women from
being educated”, all of which were acceptable views 2000 years ago however, in the modern day, we have
answers and changing societal norms, which are also in line with homosexuality. Contrasting this view, one may
argue that religious rules about private sexual behaviour between consenting adults are necessary as
homosexuality prevents humans from achieving their telos as it goes against the primary precept of reproduction.
One can use natural law to support religious rules, as Aquinas was endorsed heavily by the Catholic Church and
teachings by him often centre around God. However, again, this idea falls short of the context it was written in, as
during Aquinas’ lifetime, human lifespans were much shorter, and when applying this precept, would be fair to
argue that post-menopausal women shouldn’t marry or that infertile couples shouldn’t have sexual intercourse?
When applying religious rules to the concept of homosexuality, it may be inferred that religious rules about
private sexual behaviour between consenting adults should not be put into practice, as it contains many
contradictions, and can lead to an increase in homophobia as Christians can cherry-pick teachings whilst ignoring
others, leading an ethicist to believe that perhaps only fundamental Christians could apply religious teachings
about this topic to their own private activities.

Religious rules may arguably also have no need when regarding private sexual behaviour between consenting
adults, specifically concerning pre-marital sex, again having contextual relevance, but considerably lacking it in the
modern day. The Bible references the sanctity marriage and consequently criticised pre-marital sex as it says a
“man leaves his father and mother and is united with his wife, and they become one flesh” which implies a
spiritual, emotional, social, and sexual purpose of marriage, the union between man and woman, which is God’s
plan as he says “be fruitful and multiply; populate the earth abundantly and multiply in it”. This idea of the Biblical
teachings being against pre-marital sex would be useful in biblical times as men and women would marry young
and it would be arranged, for survival and economic purposes. In addition to this, marriage was often used as
protection for women to avoid concubinage and to prevent pregnant women from getting abandoned after being
betrothed, therefore, marriage can be seen to have its usefulness practically, emotionally, and spiritually,

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laramachin. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£4.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added