Summary
Summary Meta-ethics Revision
- Module
- G582 - A2 Religious Ethics
- Institution
- OCR
Meta-ethics revision summary
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Meta – Ethics RevisionEssay Structure – Take three theories, one paragraph for each, weigh them against
themselves and conclude that since the other two don’t make sense the last one is the only
option.
Ethical Naturalism
Key theory – moral truths can be proved, moral language is factual and ethical terms can be
defined using empirical knowledge and sense experience from the natural world. The belief
that goodness is outside ourselves comes from Plato and the world of the forms, but the
idea that we use the world around us to define it comes from Aristotle.
Main Scholar – FH Bradley – values are factual and they can be defined using natural
properties in the world.
Supported by scholars who believe you can define good :
Plato – form of the good
Bentham – Principle of Utility
Aquinas – Natural Law
Kant – Duty
Strengths of Naturalism :
• Reducing moral virtues to mere taste and opinion reduces their worth – If we base
our knowledge of moral statements on natural knowledge this gives us a solid
foundation and evidence to say whether something is right or wrong. Real world
application in the legal system.
• Peter Singer says that if ethical statements are factual and data driven people are
more likely to be altruistic and charitable. For example if people see images of
people starving in an advert they are more likely to donate money.
• A lack of definition of moral terms leads to moral nihilism. If we say that moral terms
cannot be defined we risk a state where nothing has any meaning.
Weaknesses of Naturalism:
• The value of moral statements is reduced to empirical statements. Surely the
statement ‘abortion is wrong’ carries more meaning than the statement ‘ mike is a
bachelor’.
• GE Moore - Naturalistic fallacy – we can have factual knowledge of ethical terms but
they cant be defined. There is a logical problem with using the natural world. You
cant define something that is not natural using natural terms.
• Good means different things to everyone. For example all the different scholars.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller clararead. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now