100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Memory Complete Revision Notes (Psychology AQA A-Level) £9.50   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Memory Complete Revision Notes (Psychology AQA A-Level)

 20 views  0 purchase

Complete Memory revision notes for AQA Psychology A-Level, written by a straight A* student. Includes PEEL paragraphs for every topic and diagrams where needed. Well organised and in order. Includes collated information from class, textbooks and online. Topics include: Multi-Store Model of Memory...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 19  pages

  • No
  • Memory
  • April 16, 2024
  • 19
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (453)
avatar-seller
izzyjohns1
Memory


Memory
Multi-Store Model of Memory - Atkinson and
Shi rin (1968)




Sensory Register (SR)
‣ Automatic response to any sensory information by the sense organs
‣ All information passes through
Coding in the SR
‣ Stored in a raw, unprocessed form
‣ Separate sensory stores for di erent inputs
Iconic store: visual
Echoic store: auditory
Gustatory store: taste
Olfactory store: smell
Haptic store: tactile (touch)

Research on coding
‣ Crowder (1993) found the SR retains information in the iconic store for a few
milliseconds but 2-3 seconds in the echoic store
‣ Supports the idea that di erent sensory information is coded in di erent stores which
have di erent durations

Evaluation
‣ Face validity as after-images produced by moving a light shows good evidence for
sensory memories

Capacity of the SR
‣ Unlimited
‣ Information contains highly detailed and in an ever-changing format
Research on capacity
‣ 3x4 grids were ashed onto a screen for 1/20th of a second and participants were
asked to recall letters of 1 row
‣ Recall of letters was high suggesting all the information was there and the capacity of
the iconic store is very large


Page 1 of 19 A Level Psychology Paper 1


ffff fl ff ff ff

,Memory
Evaluation
‣ Low mundane realism and external validity as it is an arti cial task which wouldn’t be
done every day
‣ You cant prove anything so inferences have to be made
Duration of the SR
‣ 250 milliseconds but di ers between di erent sensory stores
Research
‣ Walsh and Thompson (1978) said the iconic store has an average duration of 500
milliseconds which decreases as individuals get older
‣ Suggests duration is limited and dependant on age
Evaluation
‣ Biological explanation for duration due to brief duration of sensory memories as their
physical trace fades quickly
‣ Evolutionary theory suggests people only need to focus on perceptual information with
an immediate survival value
‣ Retaining non-useful information would stop this

Short-term Memory (STM)
‣ Temporarily stores information received from the SR
‣ Contains information you pay attention to
‣ Is an active memory system containing information currently being thought about
Coding in the STM
‣ Arrives in its raw form from the SR and is then encoded in an easier form
‣ Mainly coded acoustically
Visually: thinking of an image
Acoustically: repeatedly saying the word
Semantically: by using knowledge

Research of coding - Baddeley (1966)
Aim
To assess coding in the STM and LTM

Procedure
‣ 75 participants were presents with lists repeated 4 times
A. acoustically similar (sound the same)
B. acoustically dissimilar (sound di erent)
C. semantically similar (mean the same)
D. semantically dissimilar (di erent meanings)
‣ To test coding in the STM: participants were given a list with original words in the
wrong order and they had to rearrange them
‣ To test coding in the LTM: same procedure but 20 minutes later to ensure information
was in the LTM (during the break, participants did a task to prevent rehearsal)

Findings
STM
‣ Participants given list A performed the worst (10%) - confused similar-sounding words
‣ Recall for other lists was around 60-80%
Page 2 of 19 A Level Psychology Paper 1


ff ff ff ff fi

, Memory
LTM
‣ Participants given list C performed the worst (55%) - confused similar-meaning words
‣ recall for other lists was around 70-85%
Conclusion
‣ There was acoustic confusion suggesting the STM is coded acoustically
‣ There was semantic confusion suggesting the LTM is coded semantically

Evaluation of the Study
Strengths Weaknesses
Face validity - if you had to remember a Lacks ecological validity - it isn’t
shopping list you would repeat the words representative
but if you remember a book you remember
the plot
High internal validity - lab experiment so it Some stimuli like faces or smell of food
can be replicated and there is a cause and would be di cult to code acoustically
e ect relationship

Capacity of the STM
‣ 7±2 items can be held
‣ Chunking increasing the capacity by grouping lots of information together to make it
easier to remember

Research
‣ Jacobs (1887) found that people could recall 7 digits in an immediate recall task but 9
items for letters
‣ There are less letters than numbers to remember so letters have probably been
rehearsed more individually than every number
‣ Simon (1974) said the e ectiveness of chunking varies with the material being recalled
and the amount of information within the chunks
‣ Daneman and Carpenter (1980) found capacity varied between 5 and 20 chunks
between those with advanced and poor reading comprehension
‣ Suggests practice a ects STM capacity
Evaluation
‣ Age and practice and also a ect STM capacity
Duration of the STM
‣ 18-30 seconds
‣ This can be extended by rehearsals information and if done for long enough, will
transfer the information into the LTM where it will become a more log-lasting feature

Research
‣ Peterson and Peterson (1959) got students to recall 3 letters after longer and longer
intervals
‣ 90% of trigrams were recalled correctly after 3 seconds, 5% after 18 seconds
‣ Suggests duration is between 20-30 seconds

Page 3 of 19 A Level Psychology Paper 1


ff

ffi ff ff ff

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller izzyjohns1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £9.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£9.50
  • (0)
  Add to cart