100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Occupiers' Liability: Law of Tort (LAWD10011) £4.49
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Bristol (UOB)
  4.  
  5. Law of Tort (LAWD10011)

Summary

Summary Occupiers' Liability: Law of Tort (LAWD10011)

 0 purchase

An in-depth summarised and collated notes regarding occupiers' liability with detailed notes on the legislations (OLA 1957 AND 1984) and case summaries with annotations to important quotes for easy answering of PQs.

Preview 2 out of 18  pages

Document information

  • July 2, 2024
  • 18
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (6)

Seller

avatar-seller
lakshnishetty

Content preview

OCCUPIERS LIABILITY
INTRODUCTION
Occupiers’ liability familiar in that it resonates a lot with negligence principles.
 In fact, occupiers’ liability may best be understood as a special kind of negligence that
applies to occupiers of premises.




 A Special Liability Regime

So, what is occupiers’ liability and why does it get its own set of principles and rules outside
standard negligence?
 Occupiers liability is a branch of tort law which prescribes the duty of care occupiers
owe to make their premises safe.
 If premises are dangerous and cause harm to people who enter them, occupiers’
liability may arise.


Why are occupiers’ subject to a special liability regime and not simply held to the principles
of ordinary negligence? Why have the legislature chosen to enact not one but two statutes
setting out the duties occupiers owe?
As tort law developed, judges struggled to delineate the scope of occupiers’ liability at
common law.
» Judges were reluctant to apply ordinary negligence principles not least because not
everyone who is on someone’s premises has the same right to be there.
 Should the occupier owe the same duty of care to a burglar as to a dinner
guest?


Because of these concerns, the common law came up with a complicated set of technical
rules around occupiers’ liability which turned on the status of the entrant.
 If the entrant was an ‘invitee’, a high duty of care was owed;

1

,  if they were a ‘licencee’ a lower duty was owed;
 and if the entrant was a trespasser, well the courts were reluctant to impose any duty
at all.

‘Invitee’ and ‘licencee’ ~ were dissolved in favour of a single category – ‘visitor’ – when the
1957 Act was enacted.
 But, pre-1957, judges agonised about these distinctions resulting in quite contorted
case law.
 And, of course, there was the problem of innocent trespassers.
à It’s all very well being harsh on a burglar but what about a little kid who
inadvertently wanders onto someone else’s land?


 Even after the 1957 Act, the judges were far from agreed about adopting a
compassionate stance towards child trespassers – for this reason that the OLA 1984
was introduced.

 In sum, the common law made a bit of a pigs’ breakfast of occupiers’ liability so – the
legislature intervened,
~ First to regulate the duty owed to ‘visitors’ under the 1957 Act
~ Later to regulate the duty owed to ‘non-visitors’, i.e., trespassers, in the 1984 Act.


 Situations where occupiers’ liability may arise

* A man falls down the stairs of a pub because the hallway is unlit

* A foolhardy teenager dives into a shallow pond in a public park and breaks his neck

* A tipsy customer slips on the floor of a busy takeaway on a wet Friday night

* A burglar trips on the stairs of the premises he is burgling because one of the floorboards
is loose and needs repairing


 Liability for the state of the ‘premises’


A distinctive feature of occupiers’ liability is that is concerned with the safety of ‘premises’.
But what counts as premises? By and large, this is common sense.
» OLA 1957, s 1(1) states

‘The rules enacted … shall have effect … to regulate the duty which an occupier of premises
owes to his visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises …’
» OLA 1957, s 1(3) goes on to say




2

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lakshnishetty. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

65630 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£4.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added