Essay
Intoxication Evaluation Plan
- Module
- Intoxication
- Institution
- WJEC
An in-depth evaluation of the law on intoxication. The plan provides a balanced argument and is of an A* standard.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
IntoxicationIf a question is about balancing public policy and legal principles, public policy is referring to
public protection and legal principles refers to imposing liability where a fault occurs.
Introduction
The defence of intoxication is intended as a defence for those under the influence of
alcohol, drugs, or other substances.
It is used differently within specific and basic intent crimes and is sometimes referred
to as a mens rea test rather than an actual defence.
Specific and Basic Intent
The defence draws complicated distinctions between crimes of basic and specific
intent.
Specific intent crimes can only be satisfied through intention, whereas basic intent
crimes can be satisfied through either intention or recklessness.
Voluntary Intoxication
The defence also draws complicated distinctions between voluntary and involuntary
intoxication.
Principle 1: Voluntary Intoxication and the Inability to Form Specific Intent
As shown in R v Beard, where the defendant raped a girl and then suffocated her,
specific intent crimes can use the defence of intoxication where the defendant is too
intoxicated to form the mens rea.
On the one hand, this is justifiable, as it protects those who did not set out to harm
the victim.
However, it can be argued that they exposed themselves to the consequence when
choosing to become intoxicated, suggesting that the law prioritises the interests of
the defendant over the interests of the victim.
This principle was reiterated in the case of Bratty, where Lord Denning stated that a
defendant does not know what they are doing then there is a defence to the charge.
Sheehan and Moore
In line with this, the case of Sheehan and Moore, where the defendants were unable
to form the mens rea for murder after throwing petrol over a homeless person,
further suggested that voluntary intoxication can negate the mens rea for the specific
intent offence of murder.
The principle can be criticised on a number of grounds.
Firstly, given that being intoxicated is not socially acceptable, it seems strange that
intoxication for the most serious of offences, murder, becomes a defence.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller eleanortrend. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.95. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53022 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now