Exam (elaborations)

MINORITY CONFLICTS: QUESTIONS, ANSWERS AND HOPES

0 purchase

Module
MINORITY CONFLICTS

Institution
MINORITY CONFLICTS

GÁBOR KARDOS___________________ repiesentation and federalism — is that cross-cutting social cleavages has come to existence. Not all German speaking Swiss are Protestant and not all rural people are Catholic and French speaking any more.3 In conjunction with the second hypothesis it is ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 9 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 3, 2024
Number of pages 9
Written in 2024/2025
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

minority conflicts questions answers and hopes
the root causes of minority conflicts on a high

Institution MINORITY CONFLICTS
Module MINORITY CONFLICTS

TIFFACADEMICS

Member since 2 year 605 documents sold

£12.26

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

MINORITY CONFLICTS: QUESTIONS, ANSWERS
AND HOPES

GÁBOR KARDOS
Department o f International Law
Telephone number: (36-1)411-6532
e-mail:

Why are minority-majority conflicts dangerous?

If the majority - and mainly national or ethnic - minority or minorities are in
conflict over political representation, redistribution of income, social inclusion
or cultural coexistence, this could lead to a situation in which the country be
comes destabilised, and such situation poses danger not only for the state itself
and for the neighbours but also for the international community. The main
problem is that minority conflicts can not be resolved easily. According to a
study on conditions of non-violent resolution of conflicts seven hypothesis
concerning the nature of the conflict could explain why it is difficult to achieve
a peaceful settlement.' The minority conflicts fit at least into four of them. Con
flicts are more difficult to solve
- the more different structural variables (economic, social, ethnic, reli
gious. cultural, political) cumulate,
- the more dimensions of sovereignty are at stake i.e. territory, boundaries,
independence, political participation,
- the more they are ideologically loaded, ideology touches upon basic val
ues and basic identification issues (language, religion, culture and sym
bols),
- the less there are institutionalised rules for the management of conflicts."
As far as the first hypothesis is concerned, practical examples clearly show that
to overcome a minority conflict it is highly necessary that structural variables
or social cleavages do not overlap each other. One of the most important rea
sons of the success of the Swiss model - beside direct democracy, proportional

1 Sec: Frank R. Pfetsch: Conditions for Non-Violent Resolution of Conflicts. In: Emst-Otto
Czempiel. Liparit Kinzadjan. Zdcnes Masopust (cds.): Non-Violence in International Crises.
Vienna. ISSC. 1990. pp. 104-105.
2 Ibid.

, 364_________________________ GÁBOR KARDOS___________________

repiesentation and federalism —is that cross-cutting social cleavages has come
to existence. Not all German speaking Swiss are Protestant and not all rural
people are Catholic and French speaking any more.3
In conjunction with the second hypothesis it is obvious that most (but not all)
aspirations of at least the bigger minorities touch directly upon certain aspects
of sovereignty. The quest for identity and for its attributions are at the core of
the minority conflicts.
Regarding the culture of conflict minority groups „often lack the commitment
to and experience of conflict management practice”4 and from the side of the
government there is a lack of desire to be engaged in „collective standard set
ting which is basically a dialogue in search of common solutions.”5
Minority conflicts present a „clear and present danger” for the international
community. It comes predominantly from the fact that a great number of peo
ple in minority position are not committed to preservation of the state system as
it stands now. They do not identify themselves primarily with a state but with
people, they are first and foremost Tamils or Armeniens.6 The lack of
identification or ambivalent identification with the state they live in could lead
to a desire for secession and accession to an existing state or establishment of a
new one. In conjunction with such territorial changes you can easily come to
the conclusion of veritas duplex. Inviolability of borders could keep minority
conflicts alive. An author describes this situation in the following way: ’’There
are too many borders that were delineated by dictators, and authoritarian re
gimes, imposed by war or fiat, and sometimes specifically designed to contain
ethnic mixes that would preclude viable independence. To „recognise” them is
a prescription for war, not peace.”7 On the other hand the possibility of the
Ievision of borders could lead to a domino effect, rewarding secessionism.
Consequently the reason why territorial change could not serve the settlement
process comes from procedural considerations. Simply from the fact that there
is no change in borders without at least bitter conflict, if not war, because no
slate accepts easily and peacefully a border revision at its own expense. To
have the consensus of all parties involved in a negotiated border change is an
illusion, especially because the majority national consciousness regards the

Walter Kalin: Federalism and the Resolution of Minority Conflict. In: Günther Bachter (ed.):
Federalism against Ethnicity? Zürich, Verlag Rüegger. 1997, pp. 179-180.
I)a\ id Garment, the International Dimension of Ethnic Conflict, Concepts. Indicators and
Theories. Journal of Peace Research Vol. 30. 1993. p. 145.
Asbjorn Hide: Ethnic conflicts and minority protection: Roles for the international community
http://www.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu 12ec/uu 12ee0q.htm
Ted Robert Gurr: Why Do Minorites Rebel? In: Günther Bachlcr. ibid. p. 3
C. G. Jacobsen: Myths. Politics, and the Not-So-New World Order. Journal o f Peace
Research. Vol. 3. 1993, p. 249.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TIFFACADEMICS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £12.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

MINORITY CONFLICTS: QUESTIONS, ANSWERS AND HOPES

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview