Summary

Summary Tort Law - pure economic loss and negligent misstatement study guide

0 purchase

Module
Tort Law

Institution
Royal Holloway University Of London

Book
Tort Law Concentrate

This study guide provides you with an outline of what the exam may look like and includes the most important topics that may appear on the exam. Following the major topics in this study guide, will have you fully prepared for the tort law exam on pure economic loss. All of the cases that you must k...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6 pages

View example

Summarized whole book? No
Which chapters are summarized? Chapter 4
Uploaded on August 29, 2024
Number of pages 6
Written in 2023/2024
Type Summary

pure economic loss
negligent misstatement
tort law exam information
pure economic loss study guide
pure economic loss revision guide
pure economic loss exam preparation

Pure economic loss negligent misstatement
KEY FACTS
a loss which is not derived from physical injury death or propertydamage

generally not recoverable in negligence
may be consequential resulting from the acquisition of a defectiveproduct orpropert
more commonly issue arises due to a negligent misstatement or provision of
professionalservices
economic loss can be dividedby these I due to acquisition of defectiveproduct or prope
2 resulting from a negligentmisstatement
Is an area of commercial and professional importance and has shown a trend
towards expansion in the area of negligent misstatement
TWO KEY CASES Murphy v Brentwood District Council
HedleyByrne vHeller

Assessment
May arise on its own as an essayquestion focused on recentdevelopments or
policy
More lively as a problemquestion to
important to be able to distinguish
answer

pure economic loss from that which is merelythe financial outcome of tangible

physicaldamage or personalinjury
Remember there can always be recoveryfor consequential economic loss without
satisfying the followingprinciples

re

Introduction
often comes in the shape or failure to receive expected future profit or receipt of som
financial benefit or it may result from the acquisition of an item of defective

property or be due to propertydamagesustained by a third party

Along with psychiatric damage one of the two types of damage in which
duty of care is likely to be problematic or absent

I

, I Main reasons for this
1 Pure economic loss has historicallybeen seen as part of contract law tort law
has been mainly concerned with propertydamage personalinjury and death
2 Have been concerns about openingthefloodgates in terms of potentiallywidespread
and limitless losses

Historical background
To understand the scope and extent development of economic loss look at
the contrasting cases
Anns v Merton lateroverruled by MuPhy v Brentwood
initial recognition forpureeconomic loss But broad after completion block of
flats began to develop cracks and unstable froous HELD claimants suffered material
physicaldamage and ordered the council to compensate for repair costs
D's creation of defectiveproperty contract law regarded as damaged propert
for which there is a duty of care innegligence

Murphy v Brentwood DC overruling Anns shows uncertainty s Mataji if no duty

for pureeconomic loss C's house was built on inadequate foundations leading to cracke
walls he lost profit on the sale of the house HELD Anns had been wrongly
decided the loss said to be physicaldamage was pureeconomic loss not recover

buildinghad been fundamentally hawed from the start had never existed in an unflawed

state no physicaldamagedone

Consequential economic loss v pure economic loss
consequential not an issuefor the courts results from personalinjury or physical

damage
Murphy v Brentwood the economic loss is not a result of a physical damage

the
caused property had always existed in that state
Weller v Foot andMouthdisease cattle that got the disease was not owned by C
but they lost money that they would have gotten runningthe auctions theydidn'
own the property that was damaged no consequential loss no compensation
Spartan Steel v Martin power cut majorlyaffected C's metal maningfactory 3
claims

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller nihanbaxter1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £8.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Summary

Summary Tort Law - pure economic loss and negligent misstatement study guide

Document information

Subjects

Connected book

More summaries for

Written for

Seller

Content preview