Essay

Psychology 16-Marker Essay on the Effect of Anxiety on EWT

0 purchase

Module
Memory

Institution
AQA

This is a 16-marker A level Psychology Essay on the prompt: 'Discuss research into the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.' This is a subtopic within Memory in Year 1 Content and this essay refers to key studies such as Johnson and Scott and Yuille and Cutshall. This essay c...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 2 pages

View example

Uploaded on September 4, 2024
Number of pages 2
Written in 2024/2025
Type Essay
Professor(s) Unknown
Grade A

Study Level A/AS Level
Examinator AQA
Subject Psychology
Unit Memory

Discuss research into the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.
(16 marks)

Anxiety has been shown to reduce the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies. Johnson and Scott
investigated the weapon focus effect, which draws attention away from cues and towards the
weapon only to worsen recall. There was a low-anxiety condition in which participants in a
waiting room overheard a casual conversation and saw a man walking away with a grease-
covered pen. There was also a high anxiety condition where participants overheard a heated
argument, glass shattering and watched a man walk away with a bloody knife. After this event,
all participants were asked to identify the man from a selection of 50 photos. In the lower anxiety
condition, 49% of participants successfully identified the man compared to 33% in the high
anxiety condition. This study demonstrated how anxiety reduces the quality of eyewitness
testimony and particularly how the weapon focus effect prevents individuals from paying
attention to the man so any memory of his appearance doesn't enter the sensory register and
short-term memory.

This conclusion on the effect of anxiety may not be generalisable to all situations. Evdence from
Yuille and Cutshall’s study shows how anxiety may, in reality, increase the quality of eyewitness
testimony. The participants studied had experienced a real-life high-anxiety situation (a shooting
in a robbery) and were interviewed months after the incident. Their accounts were compared to
their initial testimony provided to the police with little difference in the details. Those who rated
their anxiety higher at the incident were able to provide more details than those who reported
being less anxious. This contradicts Johnson and Scott's study and reveals there may have
been limitations with the weapon focus experiment because it was an artificial situation in
comparison to the real-world robbery in Yuille and Cutshall’s study. Artificial tasks may result in
demand characteristics because participants may guess the aims of the study and change their
responses reducing internal validity.

However, it must be highlighted that Johnson Scott successfully controlled many extraneous
variables in their lab experiment. They controlled exactly what the participants experienced in
the high-anxiety condition and standardised the process to ensure that they all heard the same
events (an argument and glass breaking) in the same sequence. Yuille and Cutshall were
unable to control extraneous variables in the same way so the levels of anxiety participants
faced may have varied depending on, for example, how close they were to the thief or how
much of the shooting they observed. Additionally, participant variables such as IQ and ages
may have acted as confounding variables by increasing their recall ability. This means anxiety
may not have affected their memory at all.

Finally, it can be argued that Johnson and Scott’s experiment was unable to provide a holistic
understanding of the effect of anxiety. While this experiment shows anxiety is damaging to
eyewitness testimony, Yuille and Cutshall demonstrate anxiety can also be beneficial. This may
be better explained by the Yerkes-Dodson effect because it provides a more complete
explanation by arguing the optimal level of anxiety is within the medium range of arousal and
this is most beneficial for eyewitness testimony while both low and extreme levels are

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller StudyNu. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71250 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling