100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary GDL Land Law Exam Revision Notes £18.49
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. City University (City)
  4.  
  5. LLB Law
  6.  
  7. Public Law

Summary

Summary GDL Land Law Exam Revision Notes
 1 purchase

GDL Land Law Exam Revision notes Comprehensive easy to follow revision notes that cover the essential legislation and cases for each topic. Topics covered: Land Registration Act 2002, Priority Rules, Indemnity, Adverse Possession, Leases, Proprietary Estoppel, Mortgages, Co-ownership, Trusts of La...

[Show more]
Last document update: 4 year ago

Preview 3 out of 11  pages

Document information

  • January 6, 2020
  • July 30, 2020
  • 11
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (18)

Seller

avatar-seller
ibrahimokasha

Reviews received

Content preview

LRA 2002
Priority Rules
LRA 2002:
S. 23: powers of the Registered Proprietor
Schedule 3 - Overriding interests
S. 28-29: Priority Rules
Baker v Craggs (2010), AIB v Turner– Actual occupation
Williams & Glyn's Bank v Boland: Actual occupation & Beneficial interest can override
Abbey National Building Society v Cann, Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages: Actual
occupation at the date of execution of transfer is critical, not its later registration

Alteration & Rectification
Schedule 4, LRA 2002: Must use this if they wish to recover title due to fraud
Succeeded: Baxter v Mannion, Gold Harp v Macleod.
Refused: Walker v Burton, Patel v Freddy
Section 65 LRA 2002: contains provisions relating to when alterations may be made to the
Register
 Rectifications are serious alterations, only rectification parameters (mistakes) have
claim to indemnity
Baxter v Mannion: mistake in the factual basis of the claim
Gold Harp v Macleod: false claim in regard to a lease

Indemnity
S. 58 LRA 2002: Fraud will not affect the validity of a sale
S. 1-2 LPA 1989: Formality Rules for creation of Legal and Equitable rights
S. 103 LRA 2002: contains the general power to award an indemnity (Detail in Schedule 8)
Walter v Burton - Nomad Rule does not apply in fraud/mistakes of registered land

Adverse Possession
Schedule 6 LRA 2002 – Adverse Possession – paragraph 5 sets the conditions.
Pye v Graham – establishing a claim of Adverse Possession

Types of legal rights:
s 4(2) LRA 2002: Freeholds
s 4(2) LRA 2002: Leasehold estates
s 4(1)(g) LRA 2002: Mortgages -- to secure a loan, often called a "charge"
s 27 LRA 2002: Expressly created easements where the burdened land is registered
& those not on the register:
Adverse possession
s 54 LPA 1925 Short leases for a term not exceeding three years is automatically a legal
interest
Easements by prescription (long use, 10+)

Types of equitable rights: do not have to be "perfect" in formality
Options: Right to buy my land, or right to force me to sell
Covenants: Contractual, obligations to do, or not to do something on land (e.g. to build, not
to trade)
Estoppel:
Equitable co-ownership
Pre-emotion: Right to first refusal, if I decide to sell, I have to sell to you

, → Equitable rights cannot bind a person if they are bona fide purchaser of a legal estate for
value without notice (an innocent party who purchases property without notice of any other
party's claim to the title of that property)


Leases
Section that states that leases under 7-years are not to be registered:
S. 54 (2) LPA 1925: leases of 3 years or under do not have to be in a deed to be valid. They
can be agreed verbally or in writing
S. 27 LRA – Legal Leases under 7 years do not have to be registered
S. 33 LRA – Rights that cannot be protected by a notice
Paragraph 1 Schedule 3 LRA – leases (7 years max) qualify as overriding interests under
this
Street v Mountford - Exclusive possession - for a term - at a rent.

Legal Lease Formalities
1. By deed (Law of Property Act 1925, s. 52(1)
2. 7+ years must also be registered (Land Registration Act 2002 sections 3, 4)
3. 3 Years or less: may be created orally and remain as a legal estate - Law of Property Act
1925, s. 54(2)
a. Transfer must be effected by deed Crago v. Julian

Creation of a deed
Section 1 Law of Property (Misc Provisions) Act 1989
1. clear on its face that it is a deed (S 1[2])
2. signed by the grantor (S1[3])
3. witnessed (S1[3])
4. delivered


Equitable Lease formalities
Walsh v. Lonsdale: A contract in writing (not deed) for a lease (S 2, Law of Property Act
1989) takes effect as an equitable lease:
1. In writing (NOT oral)
2. Containing all the terms
3. Signed by both parties

ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A LEASE
1. Exclusive Possession
2. For a term certain
3. At a rent (?)

(1) Exclusive Possession: Exceptional Circumstances where exclusive possession will
NOT amount to a lease (Street v Mountford):
1. Mortgagee in possession: because they are exercising their rights under the
mortgage
2. Acts of family generosity or charity – Grey v Taylor
3. Based on friendship where no legal relations were intended Marcroft
Wagons v Smith.
4. Service occupiers where the exclusive possession is related to the contract
of employment (Facchini v Bryson)- school caretaker, security guards, Military
personnel.

, 5. Tenant as a Lodger: where the tenant provides services (other than
maintenance) such as cleaning, food, laundry etc… Those services destroy
the exclusive possession (Street v Mountford) e.g. hotels, room in a house.
6. Multiple Occupants: 4 people sign one lease, one rent. OR all 4 would
licenses and no one would have a lease. – Four unities AG Securities v
Vaughan and Anton. v Villiers
7. Occupiers of a property that will be demolished soon. Very vulnerable to
squatters. Land Owner can allow people to occupy it to take care of it. they
will act as “guardians”. it is not a lease.
1. Camelot Properties v Khoo [2018] –not a lease because of the substance of
the agreement.
b. Westminster CC v Clarke– It may be permissible to give somebody a license
where that helps somebody perform a statutory property obligation.
1. Local authority has an obligation to house homeless people. Give a homeless
man a two bedroom flat, two weeks later a family of 4 members needs a
house, they can relocate the man.

All of the above points are subject to the Doctrine of Pretences– Antionades v Villiers– you
cannot structure the lease agreement with the sole purpose of not granting a lease.

(2) For a term:
It has to be for a certain period. It has to specify a number. It cannot say “until you pass the
GDL’.

1. S.419 LPA– leases for life and leases for marriage are converted into 90 years
leases.
2. Implied Periodic Tenancies (Prudential): if not period is specified, but you regularly
paid rent, the law will imply a period. *look out for those in exam*
3. An open ending period: lease for a thousand years but can be terminated if
Arsenal wins the champions league. It has to be an objective external event
1. Berrisford v Mexfield: supreme court decision: where an intended lease is
given to a person (non-commercial), for an uncertain period, that is to be
interpreted as a lease for their life – s419 turns it into a 90 year lease or death
whatever is closer.
 Southward Housing Cooperative v Walker – this approach could only
apply when the parties originally intended a lease for life.
 Hardy v Haselden - Berrisford does not overstep formality rules. If no
written agreement then no lease.

(3) At a rent
1. S. 205 xxvii LPA 1925 - you do not need the obligation to pay – it is not essential for
a lease. Lord Templeman in Street v M. was referring to leases under the rents act.
1. Javid v Aqil– the absence of a rental obligation is an indication that the parties
did not intend to enter into binding legal relations.
b. S.419 LPA– leases for life and leases for marriage are converted into 90 years
leases.

Implied Periodic Tenancies: if not period is specified, but you regularly paid rent, the law
will imply a period (case?)
An open ending period: lease for a thousand years but can be terminated if Arsenal wins
the champions league. It has to be an objective external event (case?)
Perpetually renewable leases (Law of Property Act 1925 145, Schedule 15)
Tenancies at will (Javad v. Aqil (1991): The dividing lines between an expressly created
tenancy at will, a legal periodic tenancy and a licence may be difficult to determine)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ibrahimokasha. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £18.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69988 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£18.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added