Summary
Summary Negligence Part 1 Revision
- Module
- Tort law
- Institution
- Cambridge University (CAM)
A Tort law revision summary on negligence liability. Received a 2:1 mark from Cambridge University!
[Show more]
Content preview
TORT SUPERVISION III REVISIONNegligence: Duty of Care (Part I)
I. BASICS
DUTY OF CARE TESTS
Neighbour Principle – Lord Atkins
Taken from Donoghue v Stevenson
You must take reasonable care to avoid acts/omissions which you can reasonable foresee would be likely
to injure your neighbour (persons who are so closely and directly affected by the act)
Anns Test
Two stages:
i. Requires a sufficient relationship of proximity based upon foreseeability
ii. Are there policy considerations to negate liability?
Criticised for making it too easy to establish a duty of care
Murphy v Brentwood District Council: “introduced a new species of liability governed by a principle
indeterminate in character…potentially covering a wide range of situations” in which the law of
negligence had no place
Caparo Test
i. Damage must have been reasonably foreseeable
ii. There must be a relationship of proximity between the parties
iii. It must be ”fair, just & reasonable” to impose a duty of care
These requirements are the ones normally used to resolve cases BUT they are extremely fluid & vague –
don’t treat them like statutory language
Only applies to novel situations not already covered; it there is already authority for a duty of care to be
imposed e.g. drivers – Caparo factors are not needed
Incrementalism
Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (Australian case): “law should develop novel categories
incrementally and by analogy with established categories, rather than by massive extension of prima
facie duty of care”
GENERAL SITUATIONS
i. Physical harm
What has to be established: reasonably foreseeable that the defendant’s actions would result in the claimant
suffering some kind of physical injury
ii. Property damage
What has to be established: it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant’s actions would result in property
being damaged, and that the claimant had a sufficient interest in the property at the time it was damaged
iii. Psychiatric illness
What has to be established: reasonably foreseeable that the defendant’s actions would result in the claimant
suffering some form of psychiatric illness, and there was sufficient degree of proximity between D’s actions and
the claimant’s psychiatric illness
iv. Pure economic loss
What has to be established: there was a special relationship between D and V, or special circumstances that
would make it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ to find that the defendant owed the claimant a duty of care geared
towards protecting the claimant from suffering some kind of pure economic loss
v. Pure distress
What has to be established: there was a contractual relationship between D and V, under which D undertook to
perform some task for V with reasonable skill and care, and an important object of D’s undertaking was to secure
some mental satisfaction for the claimant, or to save V from some sort of mental distress
NB:
“Reasonable foreseeability” = “real risk” (Lord Reid in Wagon Mound)
Less serious harm is harder to establish a duty of care for
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller am_lawgraduate. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now