Pvl 3704 - Study guides, Revision notes & Summaries

Question 2 A owns a factory manufacturing steel in a continuous process. His monthly electricity bill averages R100 000. He just received a letter from the Johannesburg Municipality in which it threatens to cut his electricity if he doesn’t immediately pay his “arrear account of R300 000”. A knows that there must be a mistake, because his account is paid in full, but also knows that if there is a disruption in his electricity supply he will suffer severe losses. He pays the amount im...

Question 1 Discuss in general (without reference to a specific enrichment action) how the extent of enrichment liability (or the quantum of the enrichment claim) will be calculated. (10) Answer In principle the plaintiff is allowed to claim the amount he has been impoverished, or the amount by which the defendant has been enriched, whichever is the lesser. (1) See Study Guide 1, pars 1.1.4 and 2.3. The quantum of the enrichment claim is calculated at the time the claim is instituted. (1) ...

PVL3704 ASSIGNMENT 3 [COMPLETE ANSWERS] SEMESTER 2 2024

PVL3704 - Enrichment and Estoppel Test ...

PVL3704 UNJUSTIFIED ENRICHMENT LIABILITY AND ESTOPPEL - CONDICTIO INDEBITI...

Exam Notes - PVL 3704 UNJUSTIFIED ENRICHMENT LIABILITY STUDY UNIT 1 - Overview Explain why there is a need for unjustified enrichment liability in any developed system of law? Liability for enrichment is necessary in any developedlegal system. There are cases in which one person obtains assets belonging toanother person in circumstances where there are no grounds for the transfer ofsuch assets and where there is nothing to justify their retention by the receiver. Example 1: In accordance ...

PVL 3704 ENRICHMENT LIABILITY AND ESTOPPEL 2020 LATEST EXAM PACK 2015 – 2019 Varsity Assist PVL3704 PVL 3704 - 2020 LATEST EXAM PACK ENRICHMENT LIBAILITY AND ESTOPPEL CONTENTS 1. May / June 2019 – Questions And Answers 2. Oct / Nov 2019 - Questions And Answers 3. May / June 2018 – Questions And Answers 4. Oct / Nov 2018 - Questions And Answers 5. Oct/Nov 2017 – Questions And Answers 6. 2015 – 2017 – Lon...

Latest exam pack questions and answers and summarized notes for exam preparation.

PVL_3704_Ass_1_and_2_Guideline_Semester_1_ PVL 3704 ASSIGNMENT 1; UNIQUE NUMBER: SEMESTER 1 Question 1 Discuss the general requirement that the defendant’s enrichment must have been at the expense of the plaintiff. Refer in your answer to case law. (15) Answer See your Study guide par 2.2.3 p 17-20 (a) Discussion of the causal link requirement and provision of relevant examples. (2) (b) Discussion of indirect enrichment problem (i) Explanation of the problem (2) (ii) De Vos’ vie...

SECTION B QUESTION 1 IN McCarthy Retail Ltd v Shortdistance Carriers CC 2001 (3) SA 482 (SCA) para [9] THE COURT SAID “WE NOW KNOW FROM THE HARD PRINT THAT THERE IS A COOMON-LAW BASIS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF A GENERAL ENRICHMENT ACTION, AT LEAST ONE OF A SUBSIDIARY NATURE IN THIS RESPECT THE DECISION OF THE MAJORITY IN Nortje’s CASE HAS BEEN SHOWN BY THE THEN LARGELY DORMANT AUTHORITY TO BE CLEARLY WRONG.” CRITICALLY DISCUSS THIS STATEMENT WITH REFERENCE TO RELEVANT CASE LAW (10...