100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

TOE samenvatting Kwalitatief onderzoek

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
34
Geüpload op
30-03-2022
Geschreven in
2019/2020

Alle aantekeningen die je moet weten voor het onderwerp kwalitatief onderzoek.

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

TOE Kwalitatief

Meeting 1 – 14 mei
Data collection and analysis
Basic idea: question and answers
- Data you try to collect is about: thoughts, expieriences, opinions etc.
- Need verbalization, transformation into language

The interviewer helps in this process by:
- Posing the right questions (contents)
- Motivational behavior (relational)

Why do we conduct interviews
Understand their perspectives (of a small number of people) on a particular idea,
program, or situation.

Features of a good interview:
- Reciprocal interactoin (interaction can influence the interview)
- Responsiveness (the respondent)
- Trust (keeping the data safe)


Attributes of interviewer
- Build rapport
- Do active listening
o Understanding rather than debating, also to underderstand the
answer
- Ask relevant follow up questions
- DO NOT THINK ABOUT ANALYTICAL CONSTRUCTS YET


Forms of interviews
- Face to face
o Observe their movements, if possible have a second interviewer/
observer
- Telephone
- Online
- Go-along interview
o Collecting information, when you interview a CEO, walking around in
the building
- Ethnographic interivew
o Follow the group for months

,How do we do interviews? – stages
1. Arrival and introduction
- Establishing raport
- Hosting the interaction

2. Introducing the research
- Seeking informed consent
- Scope of the interview

3. Beginning the interview
- Contextual background information

4. During the interview
- Breadth and depth of coverage

5. Ending the interview
- Advance notice
- Positive note
- Listen for doorstep data

Focus groups
You ask multipule people a question and they are allowed to discuss with
eachother
- Data changes during the focusgroup

- Data is generated through interaction
- Let participants listen,reflect and consider their own standpoint futher
- Not a group interview
- Spontaneity – naturalistic setting

Why do we do focus groups
- Diagnose problems
- Stimulate new ideas or identify new relationships
- Evaluate programs
- Interpret quantitative results

The purpose is not to reach consensus
E.g.s: assessing the perceptions of young people about their risk of STD’s
Gathering opinions of different stakeholders on the proposed changes to 30%
rule


What could be some of the strenghts and weaknesses of a
focus group?
- Group interaction  strength
- New topics emerge  strength
- Unskilled facilitator / moderator

, - Time and logistical effort
- Complex data analysis
- Uncomfortable participants


Avoid focus groups when:
- imply commitments you cannot keep
- participants are not comfortable with each other
- topic is not appropriate for the participants
- project requires statistical data


how do we do focus groups?
- Planning
- recruiting
- moderating
- analyzing and reporting

Stages of a focus group
1. Scene-setting and ground rules
2. Individual introductions
3. Opening topic
4. Duscussion
5. Ending the discussion

Al groups go through these stages  a model of group phases (zie dia)


Group composition and size
- Heterogenity (diverse participants) vs. Homogenity (same participants)
- Strangers, acquaintances, pre-existing groups
- Group size
o Depends on your research topic
o Depends on sensitivity or complexity of the issue
o Depends on breadth or depth of data required
o Depends on population group involved

Forms of focus groups
- Two-way – Two groups, inter and intra group discussion. Group 2 watches
as group one discusses (and vice versa). By hearing what one group
thinks, the other group discusses and reaches conclusions
- Dual moderator – Two moderators; One moderator ensures the smooth
progression of the session, while the other moderator makes sure that all
topics are covered
- Dueling moderator – Two moderators; Each offers a contrary viewpoint
to the other. This facilitates thinking about different sides of the issue in
hand

, - Respondent moderator – A participant takes on the temporary role of
moderator. This increases the chances for diverse responses
- Online focus groups

Online focus groups
- Chat room focus groups – All the respondents participate at the same
time.
- Bulletin board focus groups – A bulletin board is created. The starting
and ending dates of the bulletin board groups are communicated to the
respondents beforehand. The respondents can participate at a time of their
choice.

Designing fieldwork material for internet
- Pre-upload questions and prompts
- Short and clear question
- More enabling techniques (photo’s, videos, etc.)
- Online gaming


Topic guides (topic lists)
Document that outlines the key questions, subtopics and prompts to be used
data collection
- Prompts: question you ask the participants when they already talk about
the topic.
- Prompting questions: asking the participants questions about topics
they never asked themselfs

- Designing topic guides
o Degree of consistency in data collection
o Flexibility to pursue the individual, salient details
o Consultation and discussion with stakeholders
o Common understanding of the intended approach

- Content, structure, and length of guides
o Review the specifications, study objective, literature etc.
o Group and order key issues without repetition
o Prevent ‘scope creep’  when you ask een question so general, it
could be anything

Memos/field notes
- Data collection summary sheets
o key points
o additional participant details
o issues relating to the context, child walking around
o topic guid evaluation and thoughts about refinement
o thought relating to analysis

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 maart 2022
Aantal pagina's
34
Geschreven in
2019/2020
Type
SAMENVATTING

Onderwerpen

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
femkeannaz Universiteit Utrecht
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
23
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
18
Documenten
9
Laatst verkocht
5 maanden geleden

4,0

3 beoordelingen

5
1
4
1
3
1
2
0
1
0

Populaire documenten

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen